26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mapping of variations in child stunting, wasting and underweight within the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 2000–2017

      research-article
      India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative CGF Collaborators
      *
      EClinicalMedicine
      Elsevier
      Child growth failure, District-level, Geospatial mapping, Inequality, National Nutrition Mission, Prevalence, Stunting, Time trends, Under-five, Undernutrition, Underweight, Wasting, WHO/UNICEF targets

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          To inform actions at the district level under the National Nutrition Mission (NNM), we assessed the prevalence trends of child growth failure (CGF) indicators for all districts in India and inequality between districts within the states.

          Methods

          We assessed the trends of CGF indicators (stunting, wasting and underweight) from 2000 to 2017 across the districts of India, aggregated from 5 × 5 km grid estimates, using all accessible data from various surveys with subnational geographical information. The states were categorised into three groups using their Socio-demographic Index (SDI) levels calculated as part of the Global Burden of Disease Study based on per capita income, mean education and fertility rate in women younger than 25 years. Inequality between districts within the states was assessed using coefficient of variation (CV). We projected the prevalence of CGF indicators for the districts up to 2030 based on the trends from 2000 to 2017 to compare with the NNM 2022 targets for stunting and underweight, and the WHO/UNICEF 2030 targets for stunting and wasting. We assessed Pearson correlation coefficient between two major national surveys for district-level estimates of CGF indicators in the states.

          Findings

          The prevalence of stunting ranged 3.8-fold from 16.4% (95% UI 15.2–17.8) to 62.8% (95% UI 61.5–64.0) among the 723 districts of India in 2017, wasting ranged 5.4-fold from 5.5% (95% UI 5.1–6.1) to 30.0% (95% UI 28.2–31.8), and underweight ranged 4.6-fold from 11.0% (95% UI 10.5–11.9) to 51.0% (95% UI 49.9–52.1). 36.1% of the districts in India had stunting prevalence 40% or more, with 67.0% districts in the low SDI states group and only 1.1% districts in the high SDI states with this level of stunting. The prevalence of stunting declined significantly from 2010 to 2017 in 98.5% of the districts with a maximum decline of 41.2% (95% UI 40.3–42.5), wasting in 61.3% with a maximum decline of 44.0% (95% UI 42.3–46.7), and underweight in 95.0% with a maximum decline of 53.9% (95% UI 52.8–55.4). The CV varied 7.4-fold for stunting, 12.2-fold for wasting, and 8.6-fold for underweight between the states in 2017; the CV increased for stunting in 28 out of 31 states, for wasting in 16 states, and for underweight in 20 states from 2000 to 2017. In order to reach the NNM 2022 targets for stunting and underweight individually, 82.6% and 98.5% of the districts in India would need a rate of improvement higher than they had up to 2017, respectively. To achieve the WHO/UNICEF 2030 target for wasting, all districts in India would need a rate of improvement higher than they had up to 2017. The correlation between the two national surveys for district-level estimates was poor, with Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.7 only in Odisha and four small north-eastern states out of the 27 states covered by these surveys.

          Interpretation

          CGF indicators have improved in India, but there are substantial variations between the districts in their magnitude and rate of decline, and the inequality between districts has increased in a large proportion of the states. The poor correlation between the national surveys for CGF estimates highlights the need to standardise collection of anthropometric data in India. The district-level trends in this report provide a useful reference for targeting the efforts under NNM to reduce CGF across India and meet the Indian and global targets.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries

          The Lancet, 382(9890), 427-451
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Measuring progress and projecting attainment on the basis of past trends of the health-related Sustainable Development Goals in 188 countries: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

            Summary Background The UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are grounded in the global ambition of “leaving no one behind”. Understanding today’s gains and gaps for the health-related SDGs is essential for decision makers as they aim to improve the health of populations. As part of the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2016 (GBD 2016), we measured 37 of the 50 health-related SDG indicators over the period 1990–2016 for 188 countries, and then on the basis of these past trends, we projected indicators to 2030. Methods We used standardised GBD 2016 methods to measure 37 health-related indicators from 1990 to 2016, an increase of four indicators since GBD 2015. We substantially revised the universal health coverage (UHC) measure, which focuses on coverage of essential health services, to also represent personal health-care access and quality for several non-communicable diseases. We transformed each indicator on a scale of 0–100, with 0 as the 2·5th percentile estimated between 1990 and 2030, and 100 as the 97·5th percentile during that time. An index representing all 37 health-related SDG indicators was constructed by taking the geometric mean of scaled indicators by target. On the basis of past trends, we produced projections of indicator values, using a weighted average of the indicator and country-specific annualised rates of change from 1990 to 2016 with weights for each annual rate of change based on out-of-sample validity. 24 of the currently measured health-related SDG indicators have defined SDG targets, against which we assessed attainment. Findings Globally, the median health-related SDG index was 56·7 (IQR 31·9–66·8) in 2016 and country-level performance markedly varied, with Singapore (86·8, 95% uncertainty interval 84·6–88·9), Iceland (86·0, 84·1–87·6), and Sweden (85·6, 81·8–87·8) having the highest levels in 2016 and Afghanistan (10·9, 9·6–11·9), the Central African Republic (11·0, 8·8–13·8), and Somalia (11·3, 9·5–13·1) recording the lowest. Between 2000 and 2016, notable improvements in the UHC index were achieved by several countries, including Cambodia, Rwanda, Equatorial Guinea, Laos, Turkey, and China; however, a number of countries, such as Lesotho and the Central African Republic, but also high-income countries, such as the USA, showed minimal gains. Based on projections of past trends, the median number of SDG targets attained in 2030 was five (IQR 2–8) of the 24 defined targets currently measured. Globally, projected target attainment considerably varied by SDG indicator, ranging from more than 60% of countries projected to reach targets for under-5 mortality, neonatal mortality, maternal mortality ratio, and malaria, to less than 5% of countries projected to achieve targets linked to 11 indicator targets, including those for childhood overweight, tuberculosis, and road injury mortality. For several of the health-related SDGs, meeting defined targets hinges upon substantially faster progress than what most countries have achieved in the past. Interpretation GBD 2016 provides an updated and expanded evidence base on where the world currently stands in terms of the health-related SDGs. Our improved measure of UHC offers a basis to monitor the expansion of health services necessary to meet the SDGs. Based on past rates of progress, many places are facing challenges in meeting defined health-related SDG targets, particularly among countries that are the worst off. In view of the early stages of SDG implementation, however, opportunity remains to take actions to accelerate progress, as shown by the catalytic effects of adopting the Millennium Development Goals after 2000. With the SDGs’ broader, bolder development agenda, multisectoral commitments and investments are vital to make the health-related SDGs within reach of all populations. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Association between maternal age at childbirth and child and adult outcomes in the offspring: a prospective study in five low-income and middle-income countries (COHORTS collaboration).

              Both young and advanced maternal age is associated with adverse birth and child outcomes. Few studies have examined these associations in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) and none have studied adult outcomes in the offspring. We aimed to examine both child and adult outcomes in five LMICs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                EClinicalMedicine
                EClinicalMedicine
                EClinicalMedicine
                Elsevier
                2589-5370
                13 May 2020
                May 2020
                13 May 2020
                : 22
                : 100317
                Affiliations
                [a ]National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Hyderabad, India
                [b ]Public Health Foundation of India, Gurugram, India
                [c ]Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
                [d ]Department of Paediatrics, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
                [e ]Department of Paediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
                [f ]Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
                [g ]World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland
                [h ]WHO India Country Office, New Delhi, India
                [i ]Department of Community Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, India
                [j ]School of Health Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India
                [k ]Centre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
                [l ]Department of Pediatrics, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India
                [m ]Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India
                [n ]Indian Institute of Public Health – Gandhinagar, Public Health Foundation of India, Gandhinagar, India
                [o ]Indian Institute of Public Health – Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurugram, India
                [p ]Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India
                [q ]Department of Physiology and Nutrition, St John's Medical College, Bengaluru, India
                [r ]Bodoland University, Kokrajhar, India
                [s ]Advanced Paediatrics Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
                [t ]Nagpur INTERGROWTH-21st Research Centre, Ketkar Hospital, Nagpur, India
                [u ]Regional Office for South-East Asia, World Health Organization, New Delhi, India
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Indian Council of Medical Research, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110029, India. lalit.dandona@ 123456icmr.gov.in
                [⁎]

                These authors are listed alphabetically.

                [⁎]

                Collaborators listed at the end of the Article.

                Article
                S2589-5370(20)30061-4 100317
                10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100317
                7264980
                32510044
                118cf9fe-c424-410a-b5f1-44ca97ac4269
                © 2020 World Health Organization

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/).

                History
                Categories
                Research paper

                child growth failure,district-level,geospatial mapping,inequality,national nutrition mission,prevalence,stunting,time trends,under-five,undernutrition,underweight,wasting,who/unicef targets

                Comments

                Comment on this article