22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Role of a research ethics committee in follow-up and publication of results.

      Lancet
      Clinical Trials as Topic, statistics & numerical data, Ethics Committees, Research, standards, Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Follow-up of clinical trials is a commitment rarely fulfilled by research ethics committees (RECs). We assessed the output of clinical trials submitted in 1997 to our REC, and talked to principal investigators, sponsors, contract research organisations, or a combination of these. During 1997, our REC reviewed 166 clinical trials, and approved 158. The recruitment rate was lower than expected in 45% (64/143) of all initiated clinical trials; 64% (92/143) were finished in accordance with protocol. 3 years after, the results of only 21% (26/123) of finished clinical trials were published in peer-reviewed journals, rising to 31% (38/123) if in-press articles were included. RECs should devote more effort and resources to assess public dissemination of results of clinical trials.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          12660062
          10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12799-7

          Chemistry
          Clinical Trials as Topic,statistics & numerical data,Ethics Committees, Research,standards,Humans,Periodicals as Topic,Publications

          Comments

          Comment on this article