9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Checkpoint kinase1 (CHK1) is an important biomarker in breast cancer having a role in chemotherapy response

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Checkpoint kinase1 (CHK1), which is a key component of DNA-damage-activated checkpoint signalling response, may have a role in breast cancer (BC) pathogenesis and influence response to chemotherapy. This study investigated the clinicopathological significance of phosphorylated CHK1 (pCHK1) protein in BC.

          Method:

          pCHK1 protein expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry in a large, well-characterized annotated series of early-stage primary operable invasive BC prepared as tissue microarray ( n=1200).

          Result:

          pCHK1 showed nuclear and/or cytoplasmic expression. Tumours with nuclear expression showed positive associations with favourable prognostic features such as lower grade, lower mitotic activity, expression of hormone receptor and lack of expression of KI67 and PI3K ( P<0.001). On the other hand, cytoplasmic expression was associated with features of poor prognosis such as higher grade, triple-negative phenotype and expression of KI67, p53, AKT and PI3K. pCHK1 expression showed an association with DNA damage response (ATM, RAD51, BRCA1, KU70/KU80, DNA-PKC α and BARD1) and sumoylation (UBC9 and PIAS γ) biomarkers. Subcellular localisation of pCHK1 was associated with the expression of the nuclear transport protein KPNA2. Positive nuclear expression predicted better survival outcome in patients who did not receive chemotherapy in the whole series and in ER-positive tumours. In ER-negative and triple-negative subgroups, nuclear pCHK1 predicted shorter survival in patients who received cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-florouracil chemotherapy.

          Conclusions:

          Our data suggest that pCHK1 may have prognostic and predictive significance in BC. Subcellular localisation of pCHK1 protein is related to its function.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The DNA damage response: ten years after.

          The DNA damage response (DDR), through the action of sensors, transducers, and effectors, orchestrates the appropriate repair of DNA damage and resolution of DNA replication problems, coordinating these processes with ongoing cellular physiology. In the past decade, we have witnessed an explosion in understanding of DNA damage sensing, signaling, and the complex interplay between protein phosphorylation and the ubiquitin pathway employed by the DDR network to execute the response to DNA damage. These findings have important implications for aging and cancer.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            ATR-mediated checkpoint pathways regulate phosphorylation and activation of human Chk1.

            Chk1 is an evolutionarily conserved protein kinase that regulates cell cycle progression in response to checkpoint activation. In this study, we demonstrated that agents that block DNA replication or cause certain forms of DNA damage induce the phosphorylation of human Chk1. The phosphorylated form of Chk1 possessed higher intrinsic protein kinase activity and eluted more quickly on gel filtration columns. Serines 317 and 345 were identified as sites of phosphorylation in vivo, and ATR (the ATM- and Rad3-related protein kinase) phosphorylated both of these sites in vitro. Furthermore, phosphorylation of Chk1 on serines 317 and 345 in vivo was ATR dependent. Mutants of Chk1 containing alanine in place of serines 317 and 345 were poorly activated in response to replication blocks or genotoxic stress in vivo, were poorly phosphorylated by ATR in vitro, and were not found in faster-eluting fractions by gel filtration. These findings demonstrate that the activation of Chk1 in response to replication blocks and certain forms of genotoxic stress involves phosphorylation of serines 317 and 345. In addition, this study implicates ATR as a direct upstream activator of Chk1 in human cells.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              DNA damage-induced activation of p53 by the checkpoint kinase Chk2.

              Chk2 is a protein kinase that is activated in response to DNA damage and may regulate cell cycle arrest. We generated Chk2-deficient mouse cells by gene targeting. Chk2-/- embryonic stem cells failed to maintain gamma-irradiation-induced arrest in the G2 phase of the cell cycle. Chk2-/- thymocytes were resistant to DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Chk2-/- cells were defective for p53 stabilization and for induction of p53-dependent transcripts such as p21 in response to gamma irradiation. Reintroduction of the Chk2 gene restored p53-dependent transcription in response to gamma irradiation. Chk2 directly phosphorylated p53 on serine 20, which is known to interfere with Mdm2 binding. This provides a mechanism for increased stability of p53 by prevention of ubiquitination in response to DNA damage.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Br J Cancer
                Br. J. Cancer
                British Journal of Cancer
                Nature Publishing Group
                0007-0920
                1532-1827
                03 March 2015
                17 February 2015
                : 112
                : 5
                : 901-911
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Breast Cancer Pathology Research Group, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital , Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
                [2 ]Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Mustansiriya University , Baghdad, Iraq
                [3 ]Ministry of Higher Education , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [4 ]Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital , Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
                [5 ]Department of Radiology, Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital , Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
                [6 ]Department of Cellular Pathology, The University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust , Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
                Author notes
                [7]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                bjc2014576
                10.1038/bjc.2014.576
                4453942
                25688741
                11b95e2e-cd5c-4053-85ac-7ad666d6df94
                Copyright © 2015 Cancer Research UK

                From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

                History
                : 04 May 2014
                : 18 September 2014
                : 23 September 2014
                Categories
                Molecular Diagnostics

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                chk1,breast cancer,immunohistochemistry,chemotherapy response
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                chk1, breast cancer, immunohistochemistry, chemotherapy response

                Comments

                Comment on this article