11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Scientific rigour of online platforms for 3D visualization of heritage

      Virtual Archaeology Review
      Universitat Politecnica de Valencia

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p>3D visualisations –including 3D scans and 3D reconstructions–designed as part of larger archaeology, history or cultural heritage  projects  are  commonly  shared  with  the  public  through  online  platforms  that  were  not  necessarily  designed  to host  heritage  representations  and  often  fail  to  contextualize  them.  This  paper  seeks  to  evaluate  whether five online platforms commonly used today to share 3D visualisations of heritage (Google Arts &amp; Culture, CyArk, 3DHOP, Sketchfab and  game  engines) offer  features that  facilitate  their scientific  rigour and community  participation,  based  on guidelines from International Council on Monuments and Sites(ICOMOS)and United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization(UNESCO). The author starts by summarizing recommendations from 32 international guidelines that are relevant to the 3D visualization of heritage, condensing them into nine key criteria: multi-disciplinary teams, objective-driven  methodology  and  tools,  careful  documentation, type  of  reconstruction  and  level  of  certainty,  authenticity, alternative  hypotheses,  multiple  historical  periods,  respectful  use  of  the  heritage, and  community  engagement. The author proceeds to review the platforms above comparing their features with these nine recommendations and concludes that, while there are currently available features that could help to elevate the scientific rigour of the 3D visualisations and their contextualization to  the  public, they are  not  mandatory  and  are  seldom  used.  The  paper  finishes  with  a recommendation for an information package to support3D visualisations of heritage on public online platforms.</p><p><strong>Highlights:</strong></p><ul><li><p>Online platforms for the 3D visualization of heritage fail to disclose what type of reconstruction it is and its level of certainty, struggling to balance community engagement vs scientific rigour of their contents.</p></li><li><p>ICOMOS and UNESCO recommendations regarding heritage are loosely followed on the reviewed platforms, and supporting documentation is often lacking.</p></li><li><p>Scientific rigour on these platforms could be elevated with supporting textual fields to disclose further information about each visualisation.</p></li></ul>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Virtual Archaeology Review
          Virtual archaeol. rev.
          Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
          1989-9947
          January 28 2019
          January 28 2019
          : 10
          : 20
          : 1
          Article
          10.4995/var.2019.9715
          11c690d3-9c1d-413a-8272-196e5437a8de
          © 2019

          http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article