Histopathological evaluation of pretransplant donor biopsies in expanded criteria donors with high kidney donor profile index: a retrospective observational cohort study

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

There is no consensus on the allocation of renal transplants from expanded criteria donors (ECD). The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) is used without the need for pretransplant donor biopsies (PTDB). We explored whether PTDB based on Remuzzi Score (RS) allows identification of those marginal kidneys in the highest calculated KDPI risk group (>91%) that appropriate for single transplantation. A retrospective study was conducted of 485 consecutive kidneys procured from a single center and transplanted if the RS was ≤4. We compared 5-year kidney and patients survival between KDPI groups and between RS <4 or =4 in the highest KDPI group. The median KDPI (interquartile range) was 71 (66-76) for KDPI <80% (n = 77), 86 (81-90) for KDPI 81-90% (n = 82), and 97 (94-100) for KDPI >91% (n = 205). Patient survival at 5 years was 85.7%, 85.3%, and 76.09% (P = 0.058) and death-censored graft survival was 84.4%, 86.5%, 73.6% (P = 0.015), respectively for each KDPI group. In >91% calculated KDPI group, there were no differences in graft survival depending on the RS (<4 vs. =4) (P = 0.714). The implementation of PTDB based on RS used for allocation of organs with the highest KDPI range could support to the acceptance of suitable organs for single transplantation with good patient and graft survival rate.

Related collections

Most cited references 23

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Renal transplantation after ex vivo normothermic perfusion: the first clinical study.

M L Nicholson, S A Hosgood (2013)

Ex vivo normothermic perfusion (EVNP) is a novel method of preservation that restores circulation and allows an organ to regain function prior to transplantation. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of EVNP in kidneys from marginal donors. Eighteen kidneys from extended criteria donors (ECD) underwent a period of EVNP immediately before transplantation. Kidneys were perfused with a plasma free red-cell based solution at a mean temperature of 34.6°C. The outcome of these kidneys was compared to a control group of 47 ECD kidneys that underwent static cold storage (CS). The mean donor age was 61 ± 1 years in the EVNP and 62 ± 6 years in the CS group (p = 0.520). EVNP kidneys were perfused for an average of 63 ± 16 min and all were transplanted successfully. The delayed graft function rate (DGF), defined as the requirement for dialysis within the first 7 days was 1/18 patients (5.6%) in the EVNP group versus 17/47 (36.2%) in the CS group (p = 0.014). There was no difference in graft or patient survival at 12 months (p = 0.510, 1.000). This first series of EVNP in renal transplantation demonstrates that this technique is both feasible and safe. Our preliminary data suggests that EVNP offers promise as a new technique of kidney preservation.

0 comments Cited 119 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: an approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors1

Friedrich Port, Jennifer Bragg-Gresham, Robert Metzger … (2002)

0 comments Cited 94 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

International variation in the interpretation of renal transplant biopsies: report of the CERTPAP Project.

Robert N. Taub, P. J. Furness, (2001)

The Banff working formulation of renal transplant pathology is intended to have international application. There remains a need to develop methods to harmonize the application of such grading systems between laboratories. Banff grades do not always permit precise management decisions to be made. Alternative schemes have been devised for the diagnosis of acute rejection, but there have been no independent tests of the different approaches. Sections from 55 renal transplant biopsies were circulated around the laboratories of 22 major transplant units for the Convergence of European Renal Transplant Pathology Assessment Procedures (CERTPAP) Project. Participating pathologists were asked to grade 32 different histological features, without any clinical information. After each circulation of five cases, feedback was provided to participants. Statistical evidence of improvement in interobserver variation was sought. At the end of the study, correlations with the original clinicopathological diagnosis were sought. Interobserver variation was greater than has previously been reported. For every feature studied, some pathologists consistently under-grade or over-grade. There was relatively little evidence of improvement in interobserver variation as a result of the feedback system. No single feature permitted a reliable diagnosis of acute rejection. Applying the Banff and CCTT schemas to the histological grades showed no clear diagnostic advantage for either system, but a simple computer-based inference network, which combined data from 12 histological features, out performed either approach. Within the "protocol" biopsies studied, long-term survival correlated better with "acute" than with "chronic" histological features. These results do not undermine the value of the Banff classification, but they demonstrate a need for caution when translating biopsy results between institutions. It is obvious that evaluation of biopsies in multicenter trials must be done in one center. In the management of individual patients, the need to interpret Banff grades in the light of local experience and clinical information is stressed.