66
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Engineered proteins detect spontaneous DNA breakage in human and bacterial cells

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 7 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 7 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 6 , * , 5 , * , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , *
      eLife
      eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
      DNA double-strand breaks, endogenous DNA damage, GFP, fluorescent-protein fusions, spontaneous DNA breaks, synthetic biology, E. coli, Human, Mouse

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Spontaneous DNA breaks instigate genomic changes that fuel cancer and evolution, yet direct quantification of double-strand breaks (DSBs) has been limited. Predominant sources of spontaneous DSBs remain elusive. We report synthetic technology for quantifying DSBs using fluorescent-protein fusions of double-strand DNA end-binding protein, Gam of bacteriophage Mu. In Escherichia coli GamGFP forms foci at chromosomal DSBs and pinpoints their subgenomic locations. Spontaneous DSBs occur mostly one per cell, and correspond with generations, supporting replicative models for spontaneous breakage, and providing the first true breakage rates. In mammalian cells GamGFP—labels laser-induced DSBs antagonized by end-binding protein Ku; co-localizes incompletely with DSB marker 53BP1 suggesting superior DSB-specificity; blocks resection; and demonstrates DNA breakage via APOBEC3A cytosine deaminase. We demonstrate directly that some spontaneous DSBs occur outside of S phase. The data illuminate spontaneous DNA breakage in E. coli and human cells and illustrate the versatility of fluorescent-Gam for interrogation of DSBs in living cells.

          DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01222.001

          eLife digest

          Cells have developed a variety of mechanisms for repairing DNA molecules when breaks occur in one or both of the DNA strands. However, we know relatively little about the causes of these breaks, which often occur naturally, or even about how common they are. Learning more about the most common forms of DNA breakage is important because the genomic changes caused by these breaks are driving forces behind both cancer and evolution, including the evolution of drug resistance in bacteria.

          Shee et al. have developed a new method for detecting double-strand breaks in both bacterial and mammalian cells. The method involved combining a natural virus protein called Gam with a fluorescent protein called GFP (short for green fluorescent protein) to make a fusion protein called GamGFP. Gam was chosen because it binds only to double-strand breaks, traps double-strand breaks, and does not bind to any proteins. Genetic engineering techniques were used to introduce GamGFP into cells, with DNA breaks in these cells showing up as fluorescent spots when viewed under a microscope.

          Shee et al. used this approach to detect double-strand breaks in both Escherichia coli cells and mammalian cells, and to measure the rate of spontaneous DNA breakage in E. coli. The number of double-strand breaks in E. coli was proportional to the number of times the cells had divided, which provides support for DNA replication-dependent models of spontaneous DNA breakage.

          The GamGFP method also provided various insights into DNA breaks in mouse and human cells. In particular, Shee et al. found evidence for a mechanism of DNA breakage that appears to be specific to primates. This mechanism involves an enzyme that is only found in the innate immune system of primates removing an amine group from a cytosine. In future, this approach might allow the trapping, mapping and quantification of DNA breaks in all kinds of cells, and the highly specific way GamGFP binds to breaks could make it the preferred tool for studying DNA breakage in mammalian cells.

          DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01222.002

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Identification of programmed cell death in situ via specific labeling of nuclear DNA fragmentation

          Programmed cell death (PCD) plays a key role in developmental biology and in maintenance of the steady state in continuously renewing tissues. Currently, its existence is inferred mainly from gel electrophoresis of a pooled DNA extract as PCD was shown to be associated with DNA fragmentation. Based on this observation, we describe here the development of a method for the in situ visualization of PCD at the single-cell level, while preserving tissue architecture. Conventional histological sections, pretreated with protease, were nick end labeled with biotinylated poly dU, introduced by terminal deoxy- transferase, and then stained using avidin-conjugated peroxidase. The reaction is specific, only nuclei located at positions where PCD is expected are stained. The initial screening includes: small and large intestine, epidermis, lymphoid tissues, ovary, and other organs. A detailed analysis revealed that the process is initiated at the nuclear periphery, it is relatively short (1-3 h from initiation to cell elimination) and that PCD appears in tissues in clusters. The extent of tissue-PCD revealed by this method is considerably greater than apoptosis detected by nuclear morphology, and thus opens the way for a variety of studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            53BP1 nuclear bodies form around DNA lesions generated by mitotic transmission of chromosomes under replication stress.

            Completion of genome duplication is challenged by structural and topological barriers that impede progression of replication forks. Although this can seriously undermine genome integrity, the fate of DNA with unresolved replication intermediates is not known. Here, we show that mild replication stress increases the frequency of chromosomal lesions that are transmitted to daughter cells. Throughout G1, these lesions are sequestered in nuclear compartments marked by p53-binding protein 1 (53BP1) and other chromatin-associated genome caretakers. We show that the number of such 53BP1 nuclear bodies increases after genetic ablation of BLM, a DNA helicase associated with dissolution of entangled DNA. Conversely, 53BP1 nuclear bodies are partially suppressed by knocking down SMC2, a condensin subunit required for mechanical stability of mitotic chromosomes. Finally, we provide evidence that 53BP1 nuclear bodies shield chromosomal fragile sites sequestered in these compartments against erosion. Together, these data indicate that restoration of DNA or chromatin integrity at loci prone to replication problems requires mitotic transmission to the next cell generations. © 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A Microhomology-Mediated Break-Induced Replication Model for the Origin of Human Copy Number Variation

              Chromosome structural changes with nonrecurrent endpoints associated with genomic disorders offer windows into the mechanism of origin of copy number variation (CNV). A recent report of nonrecurrent duplications associated with Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease identified three distinctive characteristics. First, the majority of events can be seen to be complex, showing discontinuous duplications mixed with deletions, inverted duplications, and triplications. Second, junctions at endpoints show microhomology of 2–5 base pairs (bp). Third, endpoints occur near pre-existing low copy repeats (LCRs). Using these observations and evidence from DNA repair in other organisms, we derive a model of microhomology-mediated break-induced replication (MMBIR) for the origin of CNV and, ultimately, of LCRs. We propose that breakage of replication forks in stressed cells that are deficient in homologous recombination induces an aberrant repair process with features of break-induced replication (BIR). Under these circumstances, single-strand 3′ tails from broken replication forks will anneal with microhomology on any single-stranded DNA nearby, priming low-processivity polymerization with multiple template switches generating complex rearrangements, and eventual re-establishment of processive replication.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Reviewing editor
                Journal
                eLife
                Elife
                eLife
                eLife
                eLife
                eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
                2050-084X
                29 October 2013
                2013
                : 2
                : e01222
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine , Houston, United States
                [2 ]Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine , Houston, United States
                [3 ]Dan L Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine , Houston, United States
                [4 ]Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine , Houston, United States
                [5 ]Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas , Austin, United States
                [6 ]Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, United States
                [7 ]Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, United States
                Harvard Medical School , United States
                Author notes
                [* ]For correspondence: rsh@ 123456umn.edu (RSH);
                [* ]For correspondence: kyle.miller@ 123456austin.utexas.edu (KMM);
                [* ]For correspondence: smr@ 123456bcm.edu (SMR)
                Article
                01222
                10.7554/eLife.01222
                3809393
                24171103
                121410d2-f4c6-4d09-a81f-c9ad9e1e3777
                Copyright © 2013, Shee et al

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 12 July 2013
                : 16 September 2013
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Health Director’s Pioneer Award
                Award ID: DP1-CA174424
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas
                Award ID: R1116
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health
                Award ID: R01-GM53158
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health
                Award ID: F32-GM095267
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health
                Award ID: CA127945
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health
                Award ID: CA097175
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health
                Award ID: R01-GM88653
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health
                Award ID: R01-GM102679
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health
                Award ID: R01-AI064046
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health
                Award ID: P01-GM091743
                Award Recipient :
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Genes and Chromosomes
                Custom metadata
                0.7
                Fluorescent derivatives of a bacteriophage protein that binds double-stranded ends can trap and label genome-destabilizing double-strand DNA breaks in bacterial and human cells, and illuminate the origins of spontaneous DNA breakage in both.

                Life sciences
                dna double-strand breaks,endogenous dna damage,gfp,fluorescent-protein fusions,spontaneous dna breaks,synthetic biology,e. coli,human,mouse

                Comments

                Comment on this article