12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology

      Submit here before May 31, 2024

      About Digestion: 3.2 Impact Factor I 6.4 CiteScore I 0.914 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Influence of the Route of Reconstruction on Morbidity, Mortality and Local Recurrence after Esophagectomy for Cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: A choice of retrosternal or orthotopic route for reconstruction exists after three-phase esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis. Whether the route of reconstruction affects postoperative morbidity, mortality and recurrence patterns remains controversial. Study Design: Patients with cancer of the thoracic esophagus who underwent three-phase esophagectomy between 1990 and 1999 were studied. Postoperative outcome, recurrence patterns and survival were analyzed from a prospectively collected database. Results: Seventy-five patients underwent three-phase esophagectomy. There were 46 patients in the retrosternal group and 29 in the orthotopic group. The mean age of the retrosternal group was younger than the orthotopic group, 60 and 66 years, respectively (p = 0.004). The retrosternal group also had more advanced disease; 24% of patients had curative resection compared with 59% in the orthotopic group (p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications except that the retrosternal group had more blood loss, median 800 ml compared with 700 ml (p = 0.04). Hospital mortality was 13% in the retrosternal group and 3.4% in the orthotopic group (p = 0.24). Multivariate analysis showed that age (odds ratio 1.16, p = 0.035) and pulmonary risk (odds ratio 10, p = 0.01) were predictive of hospital mortality, but not the route of reconstruction. No patient in the retrosternal group developed recurrence in the gastric conduit compared to 4 of 28 patients (14%) in the orthotopic group (p = 0.03). Two of these patients were symptomatic with bleeding from the intragastric recurrence. Survival was worse in the retrosternal group, 5-year survival was 29.8 vs. 8.2% (p < 0.01), reflecting the more advanced disease and higher prevalence of palliative resections. Conclusions: Cardiopulmonary complications and hospital mortality were not significantly different in the two groups. Recurrent tumor infiltration of the gastric conduit occurred in 14% of patients when the orthotopic route was used.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Critical appraisal of the significance of intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for cancer

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Randomized comparison of prevertebral and retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction after resection of oesophageal carcinoma.

            After potentially curative resection of oesophageal cancer and prevertebral gastric tube reconstruction, approximately one-quarter of patients develop secondary dysphagia due to locoregional recurrence. In half of them dysphagia can be prevented by using an extra-anatomical reconstruction route. The present randomized study was conducted to compare the technical and functional results after prevertebral and retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction. Sixty patients underwent resection of a carcinoma of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction with curative intent. Subsequently, these patients were randomly allocated to either prevertebral (n = 30) or retrosternal (n = 30) gastric tube reconstruction. Early and late complications and functional results were carefully monitored. Creation of the retrosternal tunnel was not accompanied by any perioperative complications. Postoperative recovery, anastomotic leakage and benign stricture formation were not significantly different between the two groups. Functional results, as measured by scintigraphic gastric emptying, quantitative and qualitative oral food intake, and changes in body-weight were similar in the two groups. After subtotal oesophagectomy retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction can be performed easily and safely, and gives functional results similar to those obtained with prevertebral reconstruction. In patients at high risk for developing secondary malignant dysphagia the extra-anatomical route is the reconstruction of first choice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              What is appropriate treatment for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus?

              Recent advances in the treatment of esophageal cancer have yielded a variety of new options for management of this highly lethal disease. Various approaches to surgical resection have been proposed. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy with or without surgery have been tested in numerous trials, the results of which are often conflicting and confusing for clinicians. The changing epidemiology of the disease between East and West adds to the controversy. In this review, the authors address some of the more controversial debates. The following questions are asked: What is the appropriate approach for surgical resection? What is the appropriate extent of resection? Is multimodality treatment appropriate for esophageal cancer?
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                DSU
                Dig Surg
                10.1159/issn.0253-4886
                Digestive Surgery
                S. Karger AG
                0253-4886
                1421-9883
                2003
                2003
                16 May 2003
                : 20
                : 3
                : 209-214
                Affiliations
                Division of Esophageal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Centre, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
                Article
                70387 Dig Surg 2003;20:209–214
                10.1159/000070387
                12759500
                1231bbdb-05d3-49b5-b4e9-a718b42b88d8
                © 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 19 June 2002
                : 21 October 2002
                Page count
                Tables: 4, References: 17, Pages: 6
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Oncology & Radiotherapy,Gastroenterology & Hepatology,Surgery,Nutrition & Dietetics,Internal medicine
                Esophagectomy,Retrosternal route,Orthotopic route,Morbidity,Complications,Mortality,Esophageal neoplasm,Route of reconstruction

                Comments

                Comment on this article