There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Inferior temporal (IT) object representations have been intensively studied in monkeys
and humans, but representations of the same particular objects have never been compared
between the species. Moreover, IT's role in categorization is not well understood.
Here, we presented monkeys and humans with the same images of real-world objects and
measured the IT response pattern elicited by each image. In order to relate the representations
between the species and to computational models, we compare response-pattern dissimilarity
matrices. IT response patterns form category clusters, which match between man and
monkey. The clusters correspond to animate and inanimate objects; within the animate
objects, faces and bodies form subclusters. Within each category, IT distinguishes
individual exemplars, and the within-category exemplar similarities also match between
the species. Our findings suggest that primate IT across species may host a common
code, which combines a categorical and a continuous representation of objects.