8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Exploring the Role of Social Media Use Motives, Psychological Well-Being, Self-Esteem, and Affect in Problematic Social Media Use

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Given recent advances in technology, connectivity, and the popularity of social media platforms, recent literature has devoted great attention to problematic Facebook use. However, exploring the potential predictors of problematic social media use beyond Facebook use has become paramount given the increasing popularity of multiple alternative platforms. In this study, a sample of 584 social media users ( M age = 32.28 years; 67.81% female) was recruited to complete an online survey assessing sociodemographic characteristics, patterns, and preferences of social media use, problematic social media use (PSMU), social media use motives, psychological well-being, self-esteem, and positive and negative affect. Results indicated that 6.68% ( n = 39) of all respondents could be potentially classed as problematic users. Moreover, further analysis indicated that intrapersonal motive (β = 0.38), negative affect (β = 0.22), daily social media use (β = 0.18), surveillance motive (β = 0.12), and positive affect (β = −0.09) each predicted PSMU. These variables accounted for about 37% of the total variance in PSMU, with intrapersonal motive driving the greatest predictive contribution, over and above the effects of patterns of social media use and sociodemographic variables. These findings contribute to the increasing literature on PSMU. The results of this study are discussed in light of the existing literature on PSMU.

          Related collections

          Most cited references82

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

          G*Power is a free power analysis program for a variety of statistical tests. We present extensions and improvements of the version introduced by Faul, Erdfelder, Lang, and Buchner (2007) in the domain of correlation and regression analyses. In the new version, we have added procedures to analyze the power of tests based on (1) single-sample tetrachoric correlations, (2) comparisons of dependent correlations, (3) bivariate linear regression, (4) multiple linear regression based on the random predictor model, (5) logistic regression, and (6) Poisson regression. We describe these new features and provide a brief introduction to their scope and handling.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.

            In recent studies of the structure of affect, positive and negative affect have consistently emerged as two dominant and relatively independent dimensions. A number of mood scales have been created to measure these factors; however, many existing measures are inadequate, showing low reliability or poor convergent or discriminant validity. To fill the need for reliable and valid Positive Affect and Negative Affect scales that are also brief and easy to administer, we developed two 10-item mood scales that comprise the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). The scales are shown to be highly internally consistent, largely uncorrelated, and stable at appropriate levels over a 2-month time period. Normative data and factorial and external evidence of convergent and discriminant validity for the scales are also presented.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The structure of psychological well-being revisited.

              A theoretical model of psychological well-being that encompasses 6 distinct dimensions of wellness (Autonomy, Environmental Mastery, Personal Growth, Positive Relations with Others, Purpose in Life, Self-Acceptance) was tested with data from a nationally representative sample of adults (N = 1,108), aged 25 and older, who participated in telephone interviews. Confirmatory factor analyses provided support for the proposed 6-factor model, with a single second-order super factor. The model was superior in fit over single-factor and other artifactual models. Age and sex differences on the various well-being dimensions replicated prior findings. Comparisons with other frequently used indicators (positive and negative affect, life satisfaction) demonstrated that the latter neglect key aspects of positive functioning emphasized in theories of health and well-being.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                16 December 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 617140
                Affiliations
                [1] 1School of Media and Communication, RMIT University , Melbourne, VIC, Australia
                [2] 2The International Cyberpsychology and Addictions Research Laboratory (iCARL), University of Tasmania , Launceston, TAS, Australia
                [3] 3Department of Marketing, Gdansk University of Technology , Gdańsk, Poland
                [4] 4Psychology Department, Nottingham Trent University , Nottingham, United Kingdom
                [5] 5School of Psychological Sciences, University of Tasmania , Launceston, TAS, Australia
                [6] 6Department of Molecular Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education , Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Julia Brailovskaia, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany

                Reviewed by: Orsolya Király, Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary; Amelia Rizzo, University of Messina, Italy

                *Correspondence: Halley M. Pontes contactme@ 123456halleypontes.com

                This article was submitted to Psychopathology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2020.617140
                7772182
                33391137
                1294e845-b031-4c6b-bbdb-b9d27bfaddcd
                Copyright © 2020 Schivinski, Brzozowska-Woś, Stansbury, Satel, Montag and Pontes.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 14 October 2020
                : 24 November 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 83, Pages: 10, Words: 8101
                Categories
                Psychology
                Brief Research Report

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                problematic social media use,social media motives,problematic behavior,well-being,self-esteem,affect,problematic consumer behavior

                Comments

                Comment on this article