18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      DNA barcoding and the taxonomy of Microgastrinae wasps (Hymenoptera, Braconidae): impacts after 8 years and nearly 20 000 sequences

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Microgastrine wasps are among the most species-rich and numerous parasitoids of caterpillars (Lepidoptera). They are often host-specific and thus are extensively used in biological control efforts and figure prominently in trophic webs. However, their extraordinary diversity coupled with the occurrence of many cryptic species produces a significant taxonomic impediment. We present and release the results of 8 years (2004-2011) of DNA barcoding microgastrine wasps. Currently they are the best represented group of parasitoid Hymenoptera in the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD), a massive barcode storage and analysis data management site for the International Barcoding of Life (iBOL) program. There are records from more than 20 000 specimens from 75 countries, including 50 genera (90% of the known total) and more than 1700 species (as indicated by Barcode Index Numbers and 2% MOTU). We briefly discuss the importance of this DNA data set and its collateral information for future research in: (1) discovery of cryptic species and description of new taxa; (2) estimating species numbers in biodiversity inventories; (3) clarification of generic boundaries; (4) biological control programmes; (5) molecular studies of host-parasitoid biology and ecology; (6) evaluation of shifts in species distribution and phenology; and (7) fostering collaboration at national, regional and world levels. The integration of DNA barcoding with traditional morphology-based taxonomy, host records, and other data has substantially improved the accuracy of microgastrine wasp identifications and will significantly accelerate further studies on this group of parasitoids. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          An inexpensive, automation-friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Extreme diversity of tropical parasitoid wasps exposed by iterative integration of natural history, DNA barcoding, morphology, and collections.

            We DNA barcoded 2,597 parasitoid wasps belonging to 6 microgastrine braconid genera reared from parapatric tropical dry forest, cloud forest, and rain forest in Area de Conservación Guanacaste (ACG) in northwestern Costa Rica and combined these data with records of caterpillar hosts and morphological analyses. We asked whether barcoding and morphology discover the same provisional species and whether the biological entities revealed by our analysis are congruent with wasp host specificity. Morphological analysis revealed 171 provisional species, but barcoding exposed an additional 142 provisional species; 95% of the total is likely to be undescribed. These 313 provisional species are extraordinarily host specific; more than 90% attack only 1 or 2 species of caterpillars out of more than 3,500 species sampled. The most extreme case of overlooked diversity is the morphospecies Apanteles leucostigmus. This minute black wasp with a distinctive white wing stigma was thought to parasitize 32 species of ACG hesperiid caterpillars, but barcoding revealed 36 provisional species, each attacking one or a very few closely related species of caterpillars. When host records and/or within-ACG distributions suggested that DNA barcoding had missed a species-pair, or when provisional species were separated only by slight differences in their barcodes, we examined nuclear sequences to test hypotheses of presumptive species boundaries and to further probe host specificity. Our iterative process of combining morphological analysis, ecology, and DNA barcoding and reiteratively using specimens maintained in permanent collections has resulted in a much more fine-scaled understanding of parasitoid diversity and host specificity than any one of these elements could have produced on its own.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Molecular Ecology Resources
                Mol Ecol Resour
                Wiley
                1755098X
                March 2013
                March 2013
                December 11 2012
                : 13
                : 2
                : 168-176
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Integrative Biology and the Biodiversity Institute of Ontario; University of Guelph; Guelph; Ontario; Canada; N1G 2W1
                [2 ]Atlantic Forestry Centre; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Fredericton; New Brunswick; Canada; E3B 5P7
                [3 ]El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Barrio María Auxiliadora; San Cristóbal de Las Casas; Chiapas CP 29290,; Mexico
                [4 ]Department of Plant Protection; Faculty of Agriculture; Atatürk University; Erzurum; 25240; Turkey
                [5 ]Department of Biology; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia; PA; 19104; USA
                [6 ]Faculty of Science; Czech Academy of Sciences; University of South Bohemia and Biology Center; Branisovska 31; Ceske Budejovice; 37005; Czech Republic
                [7 ]Natural Resources Canada c/o Canadian National Collection of Insects; Research Centre; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; 960 Carling Avenue; Ottawa; Ontario; Canada; K1A 0C6
                [8 ]Research Centre; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; 960 Carling Avenue; Ottawa; Ontario; Canada; K1A 0C6
                [9 ]National Museum of Natural History; Smithsonian Institution; PO Box 37012; MRC 105; Washington; DC; 20013-7012; USA
                [10 ]National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis; University of California Santa Barbara; 735 State St. Suite 300; Santa Barbara; CA; 93101; USA
                [11 ]Laboratoire ECODIV; Université de Rouen; Batiment IRESE A; Place Emile Blondel; F-76821; Mont Saint Aignan Cedex; France
                [12 ]Honorary Research Associate; National Museums of Scotland; Chambers Street; Edinburgh; EH1 1JF; UK
                [13 ]Finnish Environment Institute; Friendship Park Research Centre, Lentiirantie 342B; FI-88900 Kuhmo; Finland
                [14 ]New Zealand Arthropod Collection; Landcare Research; Private Bag 92170; Auckland; New Zealand
                [15 ]Department of Entomology; University of Illinois; Urbana; IL; 62801; USA
                [16 ]Colección Nacional de Insectos; Instituto de Biología; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 3er. circuito exterior s/n; Cd. Universitaria; AP 70-233; Copilco Coyoacán; DF; CP 04510; México
                Article
                10.1111/1755-0998.12038
                23228011
                12a8cee2-a50a-4920-b192-ed0c682d622c
                © 2012

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article