12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Automatic diagnosis of vocal fold paresis by employing phonovibrogram features and machine learning methods

      , , , ,
      Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The clinical diagnosis of voice disorders is based on examination of the rapidly moving vocal folds during phonation (f0: 80-300Hz) with state-of-the-art endoscopic high-speed cameras. Commonly, analysis is performed in a subjective and time-consuming manner via slow-motion video playback and exhibits low inter- and intra-rater reliability. In this study an objective method to overcome this drawback is presented being based on Phonovibrography, a novel image analysis technique. For a collective of 45 normophonic and paralytic voices the laryngeal dynamics were captured by specialized Phonovibrogram features and analyzed with different machine learning algorithms. Classification accuracies reached 93% for 2-class and 73% for 3-class discrimination. The results were validated by subjective expert ratings given the same diagnostic criteria. The automatic Phonovibrogram analysis approach exceeded the experienced raters' classifications by 9%. The presented method holds a lot of potential for providing reliable vocal fold diagnosis support in the future. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
          Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
          Elsevier BV
          01692607
          September 2010
          September 2010
          : 99
          : 3
          : 275-288
          Article
          10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.01.004
          20138386
          12b20c34-1022-45a5-ac5f-96f5e5dbc54a
          © 2010

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article