2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Leaf size estimation based on leaf length, width and shape

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Aims

          Leaf size has considerable ecological relevance, making it desirable to obtain leaf size estimations for as many species worldwide as possible. Current global databases, such as TRY, contain leaf size data for ~30 000 species, which is only ~8% of known species worldwide. Yet, taxonomic descriptions exist for the large majority of the remainder. Here we propose a simple method to exploit information on leaf length, width and shape from species descriptions to robustly estimate leaf areas, thus closing this considerable knowledge gap for this important plant functional trait.

          Methods

          Using a global dataset of all major leaf shapes measured on 3125 leaves from 780 taxa, we quantified scaling functions that estimate leaf size as a product of leaf length, width and a leaf shape-specific correction factor. We validated our method by comparing leaf size estimates with those obtained from image recognition software and compared our approach with the widely used correction factor of 2/3.

          Key Results

          Correction factors ranged from 0.39 for highly dissected, lobed leaves to 0.79 for oblate leaves. Leaf size estimation using leaf shape-specific correction factors was more accurate and precise than estimates obtained from the correction factor of 2/3.

          Conclusion

          Our method presents a tractable solution to accurately estimate leaf size when only information on leaf length, width and shape is available or when labour and time constraints prevent usage of image recognition software. We see promise in applying our method to data from species descriptions (including from fossils), databases, field work and on herbarium vouchers, especially when non-destructive in situ measurements are needed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Plant Ecological Strategies: Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              TRY plant trait database – enhanced coverage and open access

              Plant traits-the morphological, anatomical, physiological, biochemical and phenological characteristics of plants-determine how plants respond to environmental factors, affect other trophic levels, and influence ecosystem properties and their benefits and detriments to people. Plant trait data thus represent the basis for a vast area of research spanning from evolutionary biology, community and functional ecology, to biodiversity conservation, ecosystem and landscape management, restoration, biogeography and earth system modelling. Since its foundation in 2007, the TRY database of plant traits has grown continuously. It now provides unprecedented data coverage under an open access data policy and is the main plant trait database used by the research community worldwide. Increasingly, the TRY database also supports new frontiers of trait-based plant research, including the identification of data gaps and the subsequent mobilization or measurement of new data. To support this development, in this article we evaluate the extent of the trait data compiled in TRY and analyse emerging patterns of data coverage and representativeness. Best species coverage is achieved for categorical traits-almost complete coverage for 'plant growth form'. However, most traits relevant for ecology and vegetation modelling are characterized by continuous intraspecific variation and trait-environmental relationships. These traits have to be measured on individual plants in their respective environment. Despite unprecedented data coverage, we observe a humbling lack of completeness and representativeness of these continuous traits in many aspects. We, therefore, conclude that reducing data gaps and biases in the TRY database remains a key challenge and requires a coordinated approach to data mobilization and trait measurements. This can only be achieved in collaboration with other initiatives.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Annals of Botany
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0305-7364
                1095-8290
                September 17 2021
                September 03 2021
                June 22 2021
                September 17 2021
                September 03 2021
                June 22 2021
                : 128
                : 4
                : 395-406
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia
                [2 ]Department of Biodiversity, Macroecology and Biogeography, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
                [3 ]Bamboo Research Institute, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, P.R. China
                [4 ]Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459, USA
                [5 ]Terrestrial Paleoclimatology Research Group, Department of Geosciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76706, USA
                Article
                10.1093/aob/mcab078
                34157097
                12b36422-b644-4ef4-8ca8-75e981a2ebf1
                © 2021

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article