16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      EQ-5D-5L value set for Norway: a hybrid model using cTTO and DCE data

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To develop the Norwegian value set for the EQ-5D-5L based on interviews with a representative sample of the Norwegian adult population.

          Methods

          Random and quota sampling were used to recruit the sample of adults (age> 18 years) representative of the Norwegian general population. Data collection followed EQ-VT 2.1 undertaken before and after the COVID-19 pandemic from November 2019 to December 2022, using PC-assisted and video conferencing interviews, respectively. Each respondent valued 10 health states using composite time trade-off (cTTO) and 7 health states using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Different statistical models were assessed for logical consistency and predictive accuracy using cTTO and DCE data alone or in combination as hybrid models.

          Results

          Of the 1,321 respondents, 1,237 met inclusion criteria. All statistical models demonstrated logical consistency. The weighted hybrid model combining both cTTOand DCE data was preferred and had the highest predictive accuracy. Predicted values ranged from -0.453 to 1, and the dimension of anxiety/depression was the most highly valued by respondents, followed by pain/discomfort, self-care, mobility, and usual activities. These findings are not dissimilar to those for most Western European countries, and regression coefficients are closest to those for other Scandinavian countries.

          Conclusion

          This study provides the Norwegian value set for the EQ-5D-5L based on health state values obtained from members of the adult general population in Norway. This is an important contribution to economic evaluation and the broader application ofthe EQ-5D-5L in Norway including clinical and health services research, and quality measurement.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-024-03837-3.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states.

          Paul Dolan (1997)
          It has become increasingly common for preference-based measures of health-related quality of life to be used in the evaluation of different health-care interventions. For one such measure, The EuroQol, designed to be used for these purposes, it was necessary to derive a single index value for each of the 243 health states it generates. The problem was that it was virtually impossible to generate direct valuations for all of these states, and thus it was necessary to find a procedure that allows the valuations of all EuroQol states to be interpolated from direct valuations on a subset of these. In a recent study, direct valuations were elicited for 42 EuroQol health states (using the time trade-off method) from a representative sample of the UK population. This article reports on the methodology that was adopted to build up a "tariff" of EuroQol values from this data. A parsimonious model that fits the data well was defined as one in which valuations were explained in terms of the level of severity associated with each dimension, an intercept associated with any move away from full health, and a term that picked up whether any dimension in the state was at its most severe level. The model presented in this article appears to predict the values of the states for which there are direct observations and, thus, can be used to interpolate values for the states for which no direct observations exist.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D.

            In 2009, a new version of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) was introduced with five rather than three answer levels per dimension. This instrument is known as the EQ-5D-5L. To make the EQ-5D-5L suitable for use in economic evaluations, societal values need to be attached to all 3125 health states.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Valuing health‐related quality of life: An EQ ‐5 D ‐5 L value set for E ngland

              Abstract A new version of the EQ‐5D, the EQ‐5D‐5L, is available. The aim of this study is to produce a value set to support use of EQ‐5D‐5L data in decision‐making. The study design followed an international research protocol. Randomly selected members of the English general public completed 10 time trade‐off and 7 discrete choice experiment tasks in face‐to‐face interviews. A 20‐parameter hybrid model was used to combine time trade‐off and discrete choice experiment data to generate values for the 3,125 EQ‐5D‐5L health states. Valuation data are available for 996 respondents. Face validity of the data has been demonstrated, with more severe health states generally given lower values. Problems with pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression received the greatest weight. Compared to the existing EQ‐5D‐3L value set, there are considerably fewer “worse than dead” states (5.1%, compared with over one third), and the minimum value is higher. Values range from −0.285 (extreme problems on all dimensions) to 0.950 (for health states 11211 and 21111). Results have important implications for users of the EQ‐5D‐5L both in England and internationally. Quality‐adjusted life year gains from interventions seeking to improve very poor health may be smaller using this value set and may previously have been overestimated.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                andrew.garratt@fhi.no
                Journal
                Qual Life Res
                Qual Life Res
                Quality of Life Research
                Springer New York (New York )
                0962-9343
                1573-2649
                20 November 2024
                20 November 2024
                2025
                : 34
                : 2
                : 417-427
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, ( https://ror.org/046nvst19) Oslo, Norway
                [2 ]Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, ( https://ror.org/0331wat71) Nordbyhagen, Norway
                [3 ]Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, ( https://ror.org/01xtthb56) Oslo, Norway
                [4 ]Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Medical Division, Akershus University Hospital, ( https://ror.org/0331wat71) Nordbyhagen, Norway
                [5 ]Bristol Myers Squibb, ( https://ror.org/00gtmwv55) Princeton, NJ USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1000-4780
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4512-8000
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2893-3211
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7692-4099
                Article
                3837
                10.1007/s11136-024-03837-3
                11865167
                39565555
                12cab3ad-f2dd-4d80-b1f1-73c37ce944a4
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 7 November 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: Akershus University Hospital (AHUS)
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025

                Public health
                eq-5d-5l,general population,outcomes,quality of life,utilities,value set
                Public health
                eq-5d-5l, general population, outcomes, quality of life, utilities, value set

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log