38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access
      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Are there differences between Black and White patients in the use of hospice and intensity of end-of-life treatment?

          Findings

          In this cohort study of 1212 decedents, Black individuals were significantly less likely to use hospice and more likely to have multiple emergency department visits and hospitalizations and undergo intensive treatment in the last 6 months of life compared with White individuals regardless of cause of death.

          Meaning

          Despite the increase in the use of hospice care in recent decades, racial disparities in the use of hospice care and the intensity of end-of-life treatment remain.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Although hospice use is increasing and patients in the US are increasingly dying at home, racial disparities in treatment intensity at the end of life, including hospice use, remain.

          Objective

          To examine differences between Black and White patients in end-of-life care in a population sample with well-characterized causes of death.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This study used data from the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, an ongoing population-based cohort study with enrollment between January 25, 2003, and October 3, 2007, with linkage to Medicare claims data. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine racial and regional differences in end-of-life outcomes and in stroke mortality among 1212 participants with fee-for-service Medicare who died between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015, owing to natural causes and excluding sudden death, with oversampling of Black individuals and residents of Southeastern states in the United States. Initial analyses were conducted in March 2019, and final primary analyses were conducted in February 2020.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The primary outcomes of interest were hospice use of 3 or more days in the last 6 months of life derived from Medicare claims files. Other outcomes included multiple hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and use of intensive procedures in the last 6 months of life. Cause of death was adjudicated by an expert panel of clinicians using death certificates, proxy interviews, autopsy reports, and medical records.

          Results

          The sample consisted of 1212 participants (630 men [52.0%]; 378 Black individuals [31.2%]; mean [SD] age at death, 81.0 [8.6] years) of 2542 total deaths. Black decedents were less likely than White decedents to use hospice for 3 or more days (132 of 378 [34.9%] vs 385 of 834 [46.2%]; P < .001). After stratification by cause of death, substantial racial differences in treatment intensity and service use were found among persons who died of cardiovascular disease but not among patients who died of cancer. In analyses adjusted for cause of death (dementia, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and other) and clinical and demographic variables, Black decedents were significantly less likely to use 3 or more days of hospice (odds ratio [OR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.96) and were more likely to have multiple emergency department visits (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.01-1.80) and hospitalizations (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.02-1.89) and undergo intensive treatment (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.40-2.70) in the last 6 months of life compared with White decedents.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          Despite the increase in the use of hospice care in recent decades, racial disparities in the use of hospice remain, especially for noncancer deaths. More research is required to better understand racial disparities in access to and quality of end-of-life care.

          Abstract

          This cohort study uses data from the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study to examine differences between Black and White patients in end-of-life care in a population sample with well-characterized causes of death.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          The Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke Study: Objectives and Design

          The REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study is a national, population-based, longitudinal study of 30,000 African-American and white adults aged ≧45 years. The objective is to determine the causes for the excess stroke mortality in the Southeastern US and among African-Americans. Participants are randomly sampled with recruitment by mail then telephone, where data on stroke risk factors, sociodemographic, lifestyle, and psychosocial characteristics are collected. Written informed consent, physical and physiological measures, and fasting samples are collected during a subsequent in-home visit. Participants are followed via telephone at 6-month intervals for identification of stroke events. The novel aspects of the REGARDS study allow for the creation of a national cohort to address geographic and ethnic differences in stroke.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Place of death: correlations with quality of life of patients with cancer and predictors of bereaved caregivers' mental health.

            To determine whether the place of death for patients with cancer is associated with patients' quality of life (QoL) at the end of life (EOL) and psychiatric disorders in bereaved caregivers. Prospective, longitudinal, multisite study of patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers (n = 342 dyads). Patients were followed from enrollment to death, a median of 4.5 months later. Patients' QoL at the EOL was assessed by caregiver report within 2 weeks of death. Bereaved caregivers' mental health was assessed at baseline and 6 months after loss with the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, and the Prolonged Grief Disorder interview. In adjusted analyses, patients with cancer who died in an intensive care unit (ICU) or hospital experienced more physical and emotional distress and worse QoL at the EOL (all P ≤ .03), compared with patients who died at home with hospice. ICU deaths were associated with a heightened risk for posttraumatic stress disorder, compared with home hospice deaths (21.1% [four of 19] v 4.4% [six of 137]; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 5.00; 95% CI, 1.26 to 19.91; P = .02), after adjustment for caregivers' preexisting psychiatric illnesses. Similarly, hospital deaths were associated with a heightened risk for prolonged grief disorder (21.6% [eight of 37] v 5.2% [four of 77], AOR, 8.83; 95% CI, 1.51 to 51.77; P = .02), compared with home hospice deaths. Patients with cancer who die in a hospital or ICU have worse QoL compared with those who die at home, and their bereaved caregivers are at increased risk for developing psychiatric illness. Interventions aimed at decreasing terminal hospitalizations or increasing hospice utilization may enhance patients' QoL at the EOL and minimize bereavement-related distress.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Underdiagnosis of Dementia: an Observational Study of Patterns in Diagnosis and Awareness in US Older Adults

              Background Many older adults living with dementia have not been formally diagnosed. Even when clinicians document the diagnosis, patients and families may be unaware of the diagnosis. Knowledge of how individual characteristics affect detection and awareness of dementia is limited. Objective To identify characteristics associated with dementia diagnosis and awareness of diagnosis. Design Cross-sectional observational study. Participants Five hundred eighty-five adults aged ≥ 65 in the National Health and Aging Trends Study who met assessment-based study criteria for probable dementia in 2011 and had 3 years of continuous, fee-for-service Medicare claims prior to 2011. Main Measures Using multivariable logistic regression, we compared participants with undiagnosed versus diagnosed dementia (based on Medicare claims) on demographic, social/behavioral, functional, medical, and healthcare utilization characteristics. Among those diagnosed, we compared characteristics of participants unaware versus aware of the diagnosis (based on self or proxy report). Key Results Among older adults with probable dementia, 58.7% were either undiagnosed (39.5%) or unaware of the diagnosis (19.2%). In adjusted analyses, individuals who were Hispanic (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.19, 5.14), had less than high school education (OR 0.54 for at least high school education, 95% CI 0.32, 0.91), attended medical visits alone (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.11, 3.51), or had fewer functional impairments (OR 0.79 for each impairment, 95% CI 0.69, 0.90) were more likely to be undiagnosed. Similarly, among those diagnosed, having less education (OR 0.42), attending medical visits alone (OR 1.97), and fewer functional impairments (OR 0.72) were associated with unawareness of diagnosis (all p s < 0.05). Conclusions The majority of older adults with dementia are either undiagnosed or unaware of the diagnosis, suggesting shortcomings in detection and communication of dementia. Individuals who may benefit from targeted screening include racial/ethnic minorities and persons who have lower educational attainment, any functional impairment, or attend medical visits alone.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                24 August 2020
                August 2020
                24 August 2020
                : 3
                : 8
                : e2014639
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
                [2 ]Center on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
                [3 ]Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, Birmingham
                [4 ]Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
                [5 ]Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: June 12, 2020.
                Published: August 24, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14639
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2020 Ornstein KA et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Katherine A. Ornstein, PhD, MPH, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, PO Box 1070, New York, NY 10029 ( katherine.ornstein@ 123456mssm.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Huang and Sheehan had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Ornstein, Roth, Fabius, Safford, Sheehan.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Ornstein, Roth, Huang, Levitan, Rhodes, Safford, Sheehan.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Ornstein.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Statistical analysis: Roth, Huang, Levitan.
                Obtained funding: Safford.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Roth, Rhodes, Safford, Sheehan.
                Supervision: Rhodes, Safford, Sheehan.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Levitan reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study as well as grants from Amgen and personal fees from Amgen and Novartis outside the submitted work. Dr Rhodes reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study. Dr Safford reported receiving grants from Amgen outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This research project is supported by cooperative agreement U01 NS041588 cofunded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and the National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services. Additional funding was provided by grant R01 HL80477 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: Representatives from the NHLBI did not have any role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or the preparation or approval of the manuscript. Representatives of the NINDS were involved in the review of the manuscript but were not involved in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Disclaimer: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders.
                Additional Contributions: We thank the other investigators, the staff, and the participants of the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study for their valuable contributions. A full list of participating REGARDS investigators and institutions can be found at https://www.uab.edu/soph/regardsstudy/.
                Article
                zoi200551
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14639
                7445597
                32833020
                1313f18e-9b9f-4a52-aa24-35382e1f35a4
                Copyright 2020 Ornstein KA et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 4 March 2020
                : 12 June 2020
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Featured
                Online Only
                Geriatrics

                Comments

                Comment on this article