32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effect of changing the amount and type of fat and carbohydrate on insulin sensitivity and cardiovascular risk: the RISCK (Reading, Imperial, Surrey, Cambridge, and Kings) trial 1 2 3 4

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Insulin sensitivity (Si) is improved by weight loss and exercise, but the effects of the replacement of saturated fatty acids (SFAs) with monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) or carbohydrates of high glycemic index (HGI) or low glycemic index (LGI) are uncertain.

          Objective: We conducted a dietary intervention trial to study these effects in participants at risk of developing metabolic syndrome.

          Design: We conducted a 5-center, parallel design, randomized controlled trial [RISCK (Reading, Imperial, Surrey, Cambridge, and Kings)]. The primary and secondary outcomes were changes in Si (measured by using an intravenous glucose tolerance test) and cardiovascular risk factors. Measurements were made after 4 wk of a high-SFA and HGI (HS/HGI) diet and after a 24-wk intervention with HS/HGI (reference), high-MUFA and HGI (HM/HGI), HM and LGI (HM/LGI), low-fat and HGI (LF/HGI), and LF and LGI (LF/LGI) diets.

          Results: We analyzed data for 548 of 720 participants who were randomly assigned to treatment. The median Si was 2.7 × 10 −4 mL · μU −1 · min −1 (interquartile range: 2.0, 4.2 × 10 −4 mL · μU −1 · min −1), and unadjusted mean percentage changes (95% CIs) after 24 wk treatment ( P = 0.13) were as follows: for the HS/HGI group, −4% (−12.7%, 5.3%); for the HM/HGI group, 2.1% (−5.8%, 10.7%); for the HM/LGI group, −3.5% (−10.6%, 4.3%); for the LF/HGI group, −8.6% (−15.4%, −1.1%); and for the LF/LGI group, 9.9% (2.4%, 18.0%). Total cholesterol (TC), LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B concentrations decreased with SFA reduction. Decreases in TC and LDL-cholesterol concentrations were greater with LGI. Fat reduction lowered HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A1 and B concentrations.

          Conclusions: This study did not support the hypothesis that isoenergetic replacement of SFAs with MUFAs or carbohydrates has a favorable effect on Si. Lowering GI enhanced reductions in TC and LDL-cholesterol concentrations in subjects, with tentative evidence of improvements in Si in the LF-treatment group. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as ISRCTN29111298.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary: Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (Constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts).

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The glycemic index: physiological mechanisms relating to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.

            The glycemic index was proposed in 1981 as an alternative system for classifying carbohydrate-containing food. Since then, several hundred scientific articles and numerous popular diet books have been published on the topic. However, the clinical significance of the glycemic index remains the subject of debate. The purpose of this review is to examine the physiological effects of the glycemic index and the relevance of these effects in preventing and treating obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The effect of metformin and intensive lifestyle intervention on the metabolic syndrome: the Diabetes Prevention Program randomized trial.

              The metabolic syndrome is a high-risk state for diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Little is known about its prevalence and prevention in those with impaired glucose tolerance. To determine the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome at baseline in the Diabetes Prevention Program and the effect of intensive lifestyle intervention and metformin therapy on the syndrome's incidence and resolution. Randomized, controlled clinical trial. Research and community-based centers. Participants had impaired glucose tolerance (World Health Organization criteria plus fasting plasma glucose level >or=5.3 mmol/L [>or=95 mg/dL]) and were followed for a mean of 3.2 years after random assignment to intensive lifestyle intervention, metformin therapy, or placebo. Metformin, 850 mg twice daily, or intensive lifestyle intervention designed to achieve and maintain a 7% weight loss and 150 minutes of exercise per week. The metabolic syndrome was defined as having 3 or more characteristics (waist circumference; blood pressure; and levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and fasting plasma glucose) that met criteria from the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III. Fifty-three percent of participants (n = 1711) had the metabolic syndrome at baseline; incidence did not vary substantially by age. However, low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol predominated in younger participants (age 25 to 44 years), and high blood pressure predominated in older participants (age 60 to 82 years). In life-table analyses (log-rank test), incidence of the metabolic syndrome was reduced by 41% in the lifestyle group (P < 0.001) and by 17% in the metformin group (P = 0.03) compared with placebo. Three-year cumulative incidences were 51%, 45%, and 34% in the placebo, metformin, and lifestyle groups, respectively. There was no significant heterogeneity by ethnic group. The study involved a volunteer group with impaired glucose tolerance, which limits generalizability. The metabolic syndrome affected approximately half of the participants in the Diabetes Prevention Program at baseline. Both lifestyle intervention and metformin therapy reduced the development of the syndrome in the remaining participants.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                On behalf of : on behalf of the RISCK Study Group
                Journal
                Am J Clin Nutr
                Am. J. Clin. Nutr
                ajcn
                The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
                American Society for Nutrition
                0002-9165
                1938-3207
                October 2010
                25 August 2010
                25 August 2010
                : 92
                : 4
                : 748-758
                Affiliations
                [1 ]From the Medical Research Council Human Nutrition Research, Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom (SAJ, CSM, MDC, and LJB); the Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition, The University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom (JAL and CMW); the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom (BAG); the Nutrition and Dietetic Research Group, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom (GSF); and the Nutritional Sciences Division, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom (TABS).
                Author notes
                [2]

                RISCK is an acronym derived from the study center names: Reading, Imperial, Surrey, Cambridge, and Kings.

                [3]

                Supported by the UK Food Standards Agency (project NO2031). Foods were supplied by Unilever Food and Health Research Institute (Unilever R&D, Vlaardingen, Netherlands), Cereal Partners UK (Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom), Grampian (Banff, United Kingdom), Weetabix Ltd (Kettering, United Kingdom), and Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd (London, United Kingdom).

                [4 ]Address correspondence to SA Jebb, MRC Human Nutrition Research, Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NL, United Kingdom. E-mail: susan.jebb@ 123456mrc-hnr.cam.ac.uk .
                Article
                29096
                10.3945/ajcn.2009.29096
                3594881
                20739418
                1331eb6c-cc5b-4d9f-8eec-a9060f1e567f
                © 2010 American Society for Nutrition

                This is a free access article, distributed under terms ( http://www.nutrition.org/publications/guidelines-and-policies/license/) which permit unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 17 December 2009
                : 8 July 2010
                Categories
                Original Research Communications
                Cardiovascular Disease Risk

                Nutrition & Dietetics
                Nutrition & Dietetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article