10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of Xpert GBS v. culture for rapid detection of group B streptococcus in pregnant women: Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND. Group B streptococcus (GBS) is a leading cause of invasive disease, particularly in newborns. Seventy-five percent of neonates will be colonised by mothers carrying the organism. Confirmation of maternal colonisation with GBS is essential for prompt treatment and prevention of neonatal sepsis. The current gold standard of culture for isolation of GBS has a disadvantage of long turnaround time (24 -72 hours). Rapid assays are required to determine maternal carriage of GBS. OBJECTIVES. To determine the usefulness of the Xpert GBS technology v. culture methods to detect GBS carriage in pregnant women. METHODS. This was a prospective observational study of 284 pregnant women between 26 and 37 weeks' gestation. Two vaginorectal swabs were collected from each participant. One swab was processed using the gold-standard culture method, while the second swab was processed using the Xpert GBS assay. The performance of the Xpert GBS assay was then compared with that of the culture method. RESULTS. Two swabs were processed from each of 284 pregnant women between 26 and 37 weeks' gestation. Culture detected 70 GBS isolates from a total of 279 specimens (25.1%), whereas the Xpert GBS detected 66 positive specimens (23.7%). The Xpert GBS assay had a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 98%, with a positive predictive value of 92% and a negative predictive value of 96%. CONCLUSIONS. The Xpert GBS assay is a rapid and sensitive tool for prenatal detection of GBS. The assay should ideally be available in every labour ward, where women can be screened for GBS on arrival.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Group B streptococcus infection in pregnancy.

          Luke Winn (2007)
          Group B streptococcus (streptococcus agalactiae), a gram-positive coccus, is one of the major causes of maternal or neonatal severe infection and sepsis. Maternal infection associated with GBS includes acute chorioamnionitis, endometritis, and urinary tract infection.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Group B streptococcus and early-onset sepsis in the era of maternal prophylaxis.

            Despite an era of marked success with universal screening, Group B Streptococcus (GBS) continues to be an important cause of early-onset sepsis, and thus remains a significant public health issue. Improved eradication of GBS colonization and disease may involve universal screening in conjunction with rapid diagnostic technologies or other novel approaches. Given the complications and potential limitations associated with maternal intrapartum prophylaxis, however, vaccines may be the most effective means of preventing neonatal GBS disease. The global utility of conjugated GBS vaccines may be hampered by the variability of serotypes in diverse populations and geographic locations. Modern technologies, such as those involving proteomics and genomic sequencing, are likely to hasten the development of a universal vaccine against GBS.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Use of Granada medium to detect group B streptococcal colonization in pregnant women.

              Direct inoculation onto Granada medium (GM) in plates and tubes was compared to inoculation into a selective Todd-Hewitt broth (with 8 microg of gentamicin per ml and 15 microg of nalidixic acid per ml) for detection of group B streptococci (GBS) in pregnant women with 800 vaginal and 450 vaginoanorectal samples. Comparatively, GM was found to be as sensitive as the selective broth for the detection of GBS in vaginal specimens and more sensitive than selective broth for the detection of GBS in vaginoanorectal samples (96 versus 82%). The use of GM improved the time to reporting of a GBS-positive result by at least 24 h and reduced the direct cost of screening. We have also found that the inconvenience of anaerobic incubation of GM plates can be avoided when a cover slide is placed upon the inoculum, because aerobic incubation in GM plates with cover slides causes GBS to develop the same pigmentation that it develops with incubation under anaerobic conditions. These data support the routine use of GM plates or tubes as a more accurate, easier, and cheaper method of identification of GBS-colonized women compared to the enrichment broth technique.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                samj
                SAMJ: South African Medical Journal
                SAMJ, S. Afr. med. j.
                Health and Medical Publishing Group (Cape Town, Western Cape Province, South Africa )
                0256-9574
                2078-5135
                December 2018
                : 108
                : 12
                : 1032-1035
                Affiliations
                [04] orgnameUniversity of Pretoria orgdiv1Faculty of Health Sciences orgdiv2School of Medicine South Africa
                [01] orgnameUniversity of Pretoria orgdiv1Faculty of Health Sciences orgdiv2School of Medicine South Africa
                [05] Pretoria orgnameTshwane Academic Division orgdiv1National Health Laboratory Service South Africa
                [10] Pretoria orgnameTshwane Academic Division orgdiv1National Health Laboratory Service South Africa
                [07] Polokwane orgnameUniversity of Limpopo orgdiv1Faculty of Health Sciences orgdiv2Department of Medical Microbiology South Africa
                [03] orgnameUniversity of Pretoria orgdiv1Faculty of Health Sciences orgdiv2School of Medicine South Africa
                [08] Limpopo orgnameNational Health Laboratory Service South Africa
                [02] Pretoria orgnameTshwane Academic Division orgdiv1National Health Laboratory Service South Africa
                [09] orgnameUniversity of Pretoria orgdiv1Faculty of Health Sciences orgdiv2School of Medicine South Africa
                [06] orgnameUniversity of Pretoria orgdiv1Faculty of Health Sciences orgdiv2School of Medicine South Africa
                Article
                S0256-95742018001300013
                10.7196/samj.2018.v108i12.13079
                13427e44-5f0c-4ebf-8b01-b0cd540a5bfe

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 15, Pages: 4
                Product

                SciELO South Africa

                Categories
                Research

                Comments

                Comment on this article