14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development of the Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact (PAH-SYMPACT®) questionnaire: a new patient-reported outcome instrument for PAH

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Regulators and clinical experts increasingly recognize the importance of incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical studies of therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). No PAH-specific instruments have been developed to date in accordance with the 2009 FDA guidance for the development of PROs as endpoints in clinical trials. A qualitative research study was conducted to develop a new instrument assessing PAH symptoms and their impacts following the FDA PRO guidance.

          Methods

          A cross-sectional study was conducted at 5 centers in the US in symptomatic PAH patients aged 18–80 years. Concept elicitation was based on 5 focus group discussions, after which saturation of emergent concepts was reached. A PRO instrument for PAH symptoms and their impacts was drafted. To assess the appropriateness of items, instructions, response options, and recall periods, 2 rounds of one-on-one cognitive interviews were conducted, with instrument revisions following each round. Additional interviews tested the usability of an electronic version (ePRO). PRO development considered input from an international Steering Committee, and translatability and lexibility assessments.

          Results

          Focus groups comprised 25 patients (5 per group); 20 additional patients participated in cognitive interviews (10 per round); and 10 participated in usability interviews. Participants had a mean ± SD age of 53.1 ± 15.8 years, were predominantly female (93 %), and were diverse in race/ethnicity, WHO functional class (FC I/II: 56 %, III/IV: 44 %), and PAH etiology (idiopathic: 56 %, familial: 2 %, associated: 42 %). The draft PRO instrument (PAH-SYMPACT®) was found to be clear, comprehensive, and relevant to PAH patients in cognitive interviews. Items were organized in a draft conceptual framework with 16 symptom items in 4 domains (respiratory symptoms, tiredness, cardiovascular symptoms, other symptoms) and 25 impact items in 5 domains (physical activities, daily activities, social impact, cognition, emotional impact). The recall period is the past 24 h for symptoms, and the past 7 days for impacts.

          Conclusions

          The PAH-SYMPACT® was shown to capture symptoms and their impacts relevant to PAH patients, demonstrating content saturation, concept validity, and ePRO usability. Final content and psychometric validation of the instrument will be based on the results of an ongoing Phase IIIb clinical trial in PAH patients.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-016-0388-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBI/WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Workshop summary.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies. American Thoracic Society.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              ACCF/AHA 2009 expert consensus document on pulmonary hypertension a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents and the American Heart Association developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians; American Thoracic Society, Inc.; and the Pulmonary Hypertension Association.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                deb.mccollister@ucdenver.edu
                shannon.shaffer@evidera.com
                david.badesch@ucdenver.edu
                afilusch@hpk-kardiologie.de
                elke.hunsche@actelion.com
                rene.schueler@actelion.com
                ingela.wiklund@evidera.com
                apeacock@udcf.gla.ac.uk
                Journal
                Respir Res
                Respir. Res
                Respiratory Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1465-9921
                1465-993X
                14 June 2016
                14 June 2016
                2016
                : 17
                : 72
                Affiliations
                [ ]Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, 12401 E. 17th Ave., Box L957, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
                [ ]Outcomes Research, Evidera, 7101 Wisconsin Ave, Suite 1400, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
                [ ]Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Denver, 12401 E. 17th Ave., Box L957, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
                [ ]Department of Pneumology and Cardiology, HPK – Heidelberg Private Clinic, Im Rossgraben 14, 69123 Heidelberg, Germany
                [ ]Global Market Access and Pricing, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Gewerbestrasse 16, CH-4123 Allschwil, Switzerland
                [ ]Outcomes Research, Evidera, 1 Butterwick, London, W6 8DL UK
                [ ]Scottish Pulmonary Vascular Unit, Regional Heart and Lung Centre, Glasgow, G81 4HX UK
                Article
                388
                10.1186/s12931-016-0388-6
                4908719
                27301413
                1385ec1f-052c-4a5a-947c-f43159953a7d
                © The Author(s). 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 12 September 2015
                : 7 June 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005646, Actelion Pharmaceuticals;
                Award ID: NA
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Respiratory medicine
                pulmonary arterial hypertension,patient-reported outcomes,health-related quality of life,symptoms,activities of daily living

                Comments

                Comment on this article