1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Detection of Rickettsia asembonensis in Fleas (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae, Ceratophyllidae) Collected in Five Counties in Georgia, United States

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We conducted a molecular survey of Rickettsia in fleas collected from opossums, road-killed and live-trapped in peridomestic and rural settings, state parks, and from pet cats and dogs in Georgia, United States during 1992–2014. The cat flea, Ctenocephalides felis (Bouché) was the predominant species collected from cats and among the archival specimens from opossums found in peridomestic settings. Polygenis gwyni (Fox) was more prevalent on opossums and a single cotton rat trapped in sylvatic settings. Trapped animals were infested infrequently with the squirrel flea, Orchopeas howardi (Baker) and C. felis. TaqMan assays targeting the BioB gene of Rickettsia felis and the OmpB gene of Rickettsia typhi were used to test 291 flea DNAs for Rickettsia. A subset of 53 C. felis collected from a cat in 2011 was tested in 18 pools which were all bioB TaqMan positive (34% minimum infection prevalence). Of 238 fleas tested individually, 140 (58.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 52.5–64.9%) DNAs were bioB positive. Detection of bioB was more prevalent in individual C. felis (91%) compared to P. gwyni (13.4%). Twenty-one (7.2%) were ompB TaqMan positive, including 18 C. felis (9.5%) and 3 P. gwyni (3.2%). Most of these fleas were also positive with bioB TaqMan; however, sequencing of gltA amplicons detected only DNA of Rickettsia asembonensis. Furthermore, only the R. asembonensis genotype was identified based on NlaIV restriction analysis of a larger ompB fragment. These findings contribute to understanding the diversity of Rickettsia associated with fleas in Georgia and emphasize the need for development of more specific molecular tools for detection and field research on rickettsial pathogens.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Phylogenetic analysis of members of the genus Rickettsia using the gene encoding the outer-membrane protein rOmpB (ompB).

          To confirm the phylogenetic analysis previously inferred by comparison of the citrate synthase and rOmpA gene sequences (gitA and ompA, respectively), the rOmpB gene (ompB) of 24 strains of the genus Rickettsia was amplified and sequenced. rOmpB is an outer-membrane protein of high molecular mass, the presence of which can be demonstrated in most rickettsiae by immunological cross-reactivity in Western blots. No PCR amplification was obtained with Rickettsia bellii or Rickettsia canadensis. For the other rickettsiae, phylogenetic analysis was inferred from the comparison of both the gene and derived protein sequences by using parsimony, maximum-likelihood and neighbour-joining methods which gave the same organization. All nodes were well supported (>86% bootstrap values), except in the cluster including Rickettsia africae strain S and Rickettsia parkeri, and this analysis confirmed the previously established phylogeny obtained from combining results from gltA and ompA. Based on phylogenetic data, the current classification of the genus Rickettsia is inappropriate, specifically its division into two groups, typhus and spotted fever. Integration of phenotypic, genotypic and phylogenetic data will contribute to the definition of a polyphasic taxonomy as has been done for other bacterial genera.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Analysis of the systematic relationships among ticks of the genera Rhipicephalus and Boophilus (Acari: Ixodidae) based on mitochondrial 12S ribosomal DNA gene sequences and morphological characters.

            A portion of mitochondrial 12S rDNA sequences (337-355 base pairs) and 63 morphological characters of 36 hard-tick species belonging to 7 genera were analyzed to determine the phylogenetic relationships among groups and species of Rhipicephalus and between the genera Rhipicephalus and Boophilus. Molecular and morphological data sets were first examined separately. The molecular data were analyzed by maximum parsimony (MP), maximum likelihood, and neighbor-joining distance methods; the morphological data were analyzed by MP After their level of congruence was evaluated by a partition homogeneity test, all characters were combined and analyzed by MP. The branches of the tree obtained by combining the data sets were better resolved than those of the trees inferred from the separate analyses. Boophilus is monophyletic and arose within Rhipicephalus. Boophilus species clustered with species of the Rhipicephalus evertsi group. Most of the clustering within Rhipicephalus was, however, consistent with previous classifications based on morphological data. Morphological characters were traced on the molecular reconstruction in order to identify characters diagnostic for monophyletic clades. Within the Rhipicephalus sanguineus complex, the sequences of specimens morphologically identified as Rhipicephalus turanicus were characterized by a high level of variability, indicating that R. turanicus-like morphology may cover a spectrum of distinct species.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Improved confidence intervals for the difference between binomial proportions based on paired data.

              Existing methods for setting confidence intervals for the difference theta between binomial proportions based on paired data perform inadequately. The asymptotic method can produce limits outside the range of validity. The 'exact' conditional method can yield an interval which is effectively only one-sided. Both these methods also have poor coverage properties. Better methods are described, based on the profile likelihood obtained by conditionally maximizing the proportion of discordant pairs. A refinement (methods 5 and 6) which aligns 1-alpha with an aggregate of tail areas produces appropriate coverage properties. A computationally simpler method based on the score interval for the single proportion also performs well (method 10).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Medical Entomology
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0022-2585
                1938-2928
                July 2020
                July 04 2020
                March 03 2020
                July 2020
                July 04 2020
                March 03 2020
                : 57
                : 4
                : 1246-1253
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA
                [2 ]Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
                [3 ]Environmental Sciences Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
                [4 ]Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
                [5 ]Enteric Diseases Laboratory Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
                [6 ]Poxvirus and Rabies Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
                [7 ]Bacterial Special Pathogens Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
                [8 ]U.S. National Tick Collection, Institute for Coastal Plain Science, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA
                [9 ]College of Science and Mathematics, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA
                Article
                10.1093/jme/tjaa029
                13b0a954-cad6-4514-81ba-8ebbf057a919
                © 2020

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article