2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An assessment of the Dutch experience with health insurers acting as healthcare advisors

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          With managed competition, selective contracting and the appointing of preferred providers are important instruments for health insurers to improve their bargaining position in the healthcare purchasing market. Insurers can offer enrollees extra services, such as advice about their healthcare, to attract them, ensure that they remain loyal, and to channel them to preferred providers. We investigate which advice services insurers in the Dutch system of managed competition offer enrollees, how they inform them about services, and if enrollees use and appreciate them.

          Materials and methods

          From November to December 2017, two researchers independently analyzed the websites of all health insurers in the Netherlands. We also conducted a questionnaire study among 1,500 members (response 44.5%, N = 668) of the Nivel Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel.

          Results and discussion

          All insurers offer one or more services. Most enrollees do not know if their insurer offers advice (67–87% per service). Twelve per cent (N = 76) of the enrollees indicate that they ever made use of a service, mostly regarding the choice of provider (N = 42). Respondents who used healthcare advice were satisfied with it. Of all enrollees, 41% indicate that they would probably/certainly, contact their insurer for advice and 37% would appreciate it if their insurer approached them. Among enrollees, 40% indicated the potential advice has some or a major influence on their choice of insurer.

          Conclusions

          While all insurers offer at least one service, enrollees generally are unaware of them. Only a minority ever made use of such a service. However, a reasonable proportion do appreciate their insurers’ advice services and indicate that they would like to have contact with their insurer if they need care. Insurers do not appear to make the best use of the potential for giving healthcare advice and need to think about ways to increase coverage of those services.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Determinants of patient choice of healthcare providers: a scoping review

          Background In several northwest European countries, a demand-driven healthcare system has been implemented that stresses the importance of patient healthcare provider choice. In this study, we are conducting a scoping review aiming to map out what is known about the determinants of patient choice of a wide range of healthcare providers. As far as we know, not many studies are currently available that attempt to draw a general picture of how patients choose a healthcare provider and of the status of research on this subject. This study is therefore a valuable contribution to the growing amount of literature about patient choice. Methods We carried out a specific type of literature review known as a scoping review. Scoping reviews try to examine the breadth of knowledge that is available about a particular topic and therefore do not make selections or apply quality constraints. Firstly, we defined our research questions and searched the literature in Embase, Medline and PubMed. Secondly, we selected the literature, and finally we analysed and summarized the information. Results Our review shows that patients’ choices are determined by a complex interplay between patient and provider characteristics. A variety of patient characteristics determines whether patients make choices, are willing and able to choose, and how they choose. Patients take account of a variety of structural, process and outcome characteristics of providers, differing in the relative importance they attach to these characteristics. Conclusions There is no such thing as the typical patient: different patients make different choices in different situations. Comparative information seems to have a relatively limited influence on the choices made by many patients and patients base their decisions on a variety of provider characteristics instead of solely on outcome characteristics. The assumptions made in health policy about patient choice may therefore be an oversimplification of reality. Several knowledge gaps were identified that need follow-up research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Going Dutch--managed-competition health insurance in the Netherlands.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Service quality perspectives and satisfaction in private banking

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Formal analysisRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                8 November 2019
                2019
                : 14
                : 11
                : e0224829
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands
                [2 ] Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
                University of Malta Faculty of Health Sciences, MALTA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2645-8872
                Article
                PONE-D-19-15212
                10.1371/journal.pone.0224829
                6839849
                31703085
                13da17bc-49c1-4775-a7fc-ecd404025d91
                © 2019 Victoor et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 29 May 2019
                : 22 October 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 4, Pages: 13
                Funding
                Funded by: Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport
                Award ID: 201700274.003.081
                This study was funded by the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport (grant number 201700274.003.081, received by Nivel). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Providers
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Survey Research
                Questionnaires
                People and places
                Geographical locations
                Europe
                European Union
                Netherlands
                Social Sciences
                Economics
                Health Economics
                Health Insurance
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Economics
                Health Insurance
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Medical Personnel
                Medical Doctors
                Physicians
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Providers
                Medical Doctors
                Physicians
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Education
                Educational Attainment
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Policy
                Custom metadata
                The minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate our study findings are uploaded to EASY ( https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-282-9s4z) and will be made available upon request. Additionally, the same minimal anonymized data set is available upon request from prof Judith D. de Jong, PhD ( j.dejong@ 123456nivel.nl ), project leader of the Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel, or from the secretary of this panel ( consumentenpanel@ 123456nivel.nl ). The Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel has a program committee, which supervises processing the data of the Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel and decides about the use of the data. This program committee consists of representatives of the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, the Health Care Inspectorate, Zorgverzekeraars Nederland (Association of Health Care Insurers in the Netherlands), the National Health Care Institute, the Federation of Patients and Consumer Organisations in the Netherlands, the Dutch Healthcare Authority and the Dutch Consumers Association. All research conducted within the Consumer Panel has to be approved by this program committee. The committee assesses whether a specific research fits within the aim of the Consumer Panel, that is strengthen the position of the health care user.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article