1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Competence and Adherence Scale for Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CAS-CBT) for anxiety disorders in youth: reliability and factor structure

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          There has been increased research interest into the concept of treatment integrity within psychotherapy research. The Competence and Adherence Scale for Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CAS-CBT) was developed to measure therapists’ competence and adherence in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), when delivered to children and youth with anxiety disorders.

          Aims:

          The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the CAS-CBT in a naturalistic treatment setting.

          Method:

          Ratings of 212 randomly selected sessions from a clinical effectiveness trial for children with anxiety disorders ( n = 165, mean age = 10.46 years, SD = 1.49) were analysed to assess the psychometric properties of CAS-CBT. Therapy format included both individual sessions and group sessions.

          Results:

          Internal consistency for the CAS-CBT was excellent (Cronbach’s alpha = .88). Factor analysis suggested a two-factor solution for the total sample, where the first factor was related to CBT structure and session goals, and the second factor was associated with process and relational skills. The individual CBT treatment condition (ICBT) and group CBT treatment condition (GCBT) showed the same factor solution.

          Conclusion:

          The CAS-CBT is a feasible and reliable measure for assessing competence and adherence to CBT in the treatment of anxious children. Future research is needed to further assess the generalizability of this scale, its psychometric properties in different treatment populations and with other treatment approaches, and ideally with larger sample sizes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda

          An unresolved issue in the field of implementation research is how to conceptualize and evaluate successful implementation. This paper advances the concept of “implementation outcomes” distinct from service system and clinical treatment outcomes. This paper proposes a heuristic, working “taxonomy” of eight conceptually distinct implementation outcomes—acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability—along with their nominal definitions. We propose a two-pronged agenda for research on implementation outcomes. Conceptualizing and measuring implementation outcomes will advance understanding of implementation processes, enhance efficiency in implementation research, and pave the way for studies of the comparative effectiveness of implementation strategies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
                Behav. Cogn. Psychother.
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                1352-4658
                1469-1833
                May 20 2021
                : 1-13
                Article
                10.1017/S1352465821000217
                13df67aa-d086-4ece-b76c-876abd4e3d00
                © 2021

                https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article