11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment (submit here)

      This international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal by Dove Medical Press focuses on all aspects of neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders. Sign up for email alerts here.

      63,741 Monthly downloads/views I 2.989 Impact Factor I 4.5 CiteScore I 1.09 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) I 0.744 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Categorical improvements in disease severity in patients with major depressive disorder treated with vilazodone: post hoc analysis of four randomized, placebo-controlled trials

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In three 8-week studies of vilazodone 40 mg/d (NCT00285376, NCT00683592, and NCT01473394) and a 10-week study of vilazodone 20 or 40 mg/d (NCT01473381), adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) showed significantly greater improvement with vilazodone versus placebo in global disease severity as measured by mean change from baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) score. To assess the proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful improvement, a post hoc pooled analysis was conducted using categorical shifts in disease severity based on CGI-S scores at baseline and end of treatment (EOT).

          Methods

          Analyses were conducted in the pooled intent-to-treat population (N=2,218). Definitions of categorical shifts included CGI-S ≥4 (moderately ill or worse) at baseline to CGI-S ≤2 (normal or borderline ill) at EOT; CGI-S ≥5 (markedly ill or worse) at baseline to CGI-S ≤2 at EOT; and CGI-S ≥6 (severely ill or worse) at baseline to CGI-S ≤3 (mildly ill or better) at EOT.

          Results

          At baseline, 2,217 patients were moderately ill or worse. The percentage who improved to normal or borderline ill was significantly higher with vilazodone than with placebo (40.0% versus 27.8%; odds ratio [OR] =1.7, P<0.001; number needed to treat [NNT] =9). In the 979 patients who were markedly ill or worse at baseline, the percentage who improved to normal or borderline ill was significantly higher with vilazodone than with placebo (36.8% versus 25.5%; OR =1.7, P<0.001; NNT =9). The small number of severely ill patients at baseline (n =43) provided inadequate power to detect statistically significant between-group differences, but an NNT =5 was found for improvement to mildly ill or better.

          Conclusion

          Categorical shift analyses, defined using baseline and EOT CGI-S scores, showed that significantly higher proportions of patients had clinically meaningful improvements in global disease severity with vilazodone 20–40 mg/d versus placebo. This type of analysis may be useful for evaluating the effects of antidepressant treatment in adults with MDD.

          Video abstract

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          When does a difference make a difference? Interpretation of number needed to treat, number needed to harm, and likelihood to be helped or harmed.

          Although great effort is made in clinical trials to demonstrate statistical superiority of one intervention vs. another, insufficient attention is paid regarding the clinical relevance or clinical significance of the observed outcomes. Effect sizes are not always reported. Available absolute effect size measures include Cohen's d, area under the curve, success rate difference, attributable risk and number needed to treat (NNT). Of all of these measures, NNT is arguably the most clinically intuitive and helps relate effect size difference back to real-world concerns of clinical practice. This commentary reviews the formula for NNT, and proposes acceptable values for NNT and its analogue, number needed to harm (NNH), using examples from the medical literature. The concept of likelihood to be helped or harmed (LHH), calculated as the ratio of NNH to NNT, is used to illustrate trade-offs between benefits and harms. Additional considerations in interpreting NNT are discussed, including the importance of defining acceptable response, adverse outcomes of interest, the effect of time, and the importance of individual baseline characteristics.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (fourth edition, text revision)

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evidence for efficacy and tolerability of vilazodone in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

              The efficacy and tolerability of vilazodone, a combined selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and partial 5-hydroxytryptamine-1A (5-HT(1A)) receptor agonist, were evaluated in adult patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted from February 2006 to May 2007. Patients aged 18 through 65 years with MDD (DSM-IV criteria) and a baseline 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) score of >or= 22 were randomly assigned to vilazodone or placebo for 8 weeks. Vilazodone was titrated from 10 mg to 40 mg once a day over 2 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by mean change from baseline to week 8 on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), HAM-D-17, and Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety. Response rates were determined at week 8 for the MADRS, HAM-D-17, and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and -Improvement (CGI-I) scales. Data were analyzed using a modified last-observation-carried-forward method in the intention-to-treat (ITT) sample. The Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX) was also measured at baseline and week 8. Of 410 randomly assigned patients, 198 receiving vilazodone and 199 receiving placebo were included in the ITT population. The mean changes in MADRS and HAM-D-17 total scores from baseline to week 8 were significantly (p = .001 and p = .022, respectively) greater with vilazodone than with placebo. Significant (p < .05) improvements in MADRS and HAM-D-17 scores were noted at week 1, the earliest time point measured. Response rates were significantly higher with vilazodone than with placebo on the MADRS (p = .007), HAM-D-17 (p = .011), and CGI-I (p = .001). Treatment-emergent adverse events with vilazodone included diarrhea, nausea, and somnolence; most adverse events were of mild or moderate intensity. There were no clinically significant differences for either gender in ASEX scores at end of treatment. Vilazodone is effective for the treatment of MDD in adults, with symptom relief starting at 1 week, and is well tolerated at a dose of 40 mg/day. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00285376. ©Copyright 2009 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat
                Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat
                Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
                Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
                Dove Medical Press
                1176-6328
                1178-2021
                2016
                02 December 2016
                : 12
                : 3073-3081
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Allergan, Jersey City, NJ, USA
                [2 ]Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Suresh Durgam, Allergan, Harborside Financial Center, Plaza V, Suite 1900, Jersey City, NJ 07311, USA, Tel +1 201 427 8172, Fax +1 201 427 8200, Email suresh.durgam@ 123456allergan.com
                Article
                ndt-12-3073
                10.2147/NDT.S117581
                5144912
                13e0e7bb-a22e-4ada-a328-dbd4a906e0f8
                © 2016 Durgam et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited

                The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.

                History
                Categories
                Original Research

                Neurology
                depression,antidepressant,global improvement,clinical trial
                Neurology
                depression, antidepressant, global improvement, clinical trial

                Comments

                Comment on this article