14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Experimental Studies of Inter-Rater Agreement in Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Systematic Review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives: It has been recommended that clinical trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) would be more ecologically valid if its characteristic mode of diagnostic reasoning were integrated into their design. In that context, however, it is also widely held that demonstrating a high level of agreement on initial TCM diagnoses is necessary for the replicability that the biomedical paradigm requires for the conclusions from such trials. Our aim was to review, summarize, and critique quantitative experimental studies of inter-rater agreement in TCM, and some of their underlying assumptions.

          Design: Systematic electronic searches were conducted for articles that reported a quantitative measure of inter-rater agreement across a number of rating choices based on examinations of human subjects in person by TCM practitioners, and published in English language peer-reviewed journals. Publications in languages other than English were not included, nor those appearing in other than peer-reviewed journals. Predefined categories of information were extracted from full texts by two investigators working independently. Each article was scored for methodological quality.

          Outcome measures: Design features across all studies and levels of inter-rater agreement across studies that reported the same type of outcome statistic were compared.

          Results: Twenty-one articles met inclusion criteria. Fourteen assessed inter-rater agreement on TCM diagnoses, two on diagnostic signs found upon traditional TCM examination, and five on novel rating schemes derived from TCM theory and practice. Raters were students of TCM colleges or graduates of TCM training programs with 3 or more years experience and licensure. Type of outcome statistic varied. Mean rates of pairwise agreement averaged 57% (median 65, range 19–96) across the 9 studies reporting them. Mean Cohen's kappa averaged 0.34 (median 0.34, range 0.07–0.59) across the seven studies reporting them. Meta-analysis was not possible due to variations in study design and outcome statistics. High risks of bias and confounding, and deficits in statistical reporting were common.

          Conclusions: With a few exceptions, the levels of agreement were low to moderate. Most studies had significant deficits of both methodology and reporting. Results overall suggest a few design features that might contribute to higher levels of agreement. These should be studied further with better experimental controls and more thorough reporting of outcomes. In addition, methods of complex systems analysis should be explored to more adequately model the relationship between clinical outcomes, and the series of diagnoses and treatments that are the norm in actual TCM practice.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Altern Complement Med
          J Altern Complement Med
          acm
          Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
          Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers (140 Huguenot Street, 3rd FloorNew Rochelle, NY 10801USA )
          1075-5535
          1557-7708
          01 November 2019
          14 November 2019
          : 25
          : 11
          : 1085-1096
          Affiliations
          [ 1 ]Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
          [ 2 ]Department of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
          [ 3 ]New England School of Acupuncture, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences University, Worcestor, MA.
          [ 4 ]University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
          [ 5 ]Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
          [ 6 ]Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
          [ 7 ]Department of Adult Health, School of Nursing, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
          Author notes
          Address correspondence to: Eric Jacobson, PhD, MPH, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115 eric_jacobson@ 123456hms.harvard.edu
          Article
          PMC6864748 PMC6864748 6864748 10.1089/acm.2019.0197
          10.1089/acm.2019.0197
          6864748
          31730402
          1417f9f7-5335-48f6-b5ce-7c0193198627
          Copyright 2019, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
          Page count
          Figures: 1, Tables: 4, References: 59, Pages: 12
          Categories
          Review

          Comments

          Comment on this article