13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Minimally invasive fluoroscopic percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter salvage

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) dysfunction can often be treated fluoroscopically by manipulation with wire, balloon or stiff stylet, saving surgical intervention for refractory cases. We describe an enhanced percutaneous approach to PDC salvage that can lead to a more definitive intervention and salvage for cases refractory to fluoroscopic manipulation.

          Methods

          In five cases of PD catheter malfunction, the deep cuff was dissected free after a 0.035 hydrophilic wire was passed into the peritoneum through the PDC. Only the intraperitoneal portion of the PDC was explanted. The PDC was cleared of obstruction and omentum. The intraperitoneal portion of the PDC was reimplanted over wire via a peel-away sheath and the deep cuff sutured.

          Results

          Omental entrapment was present in three of five patients and fibrin occlusion in four of the five cases. All catheters were repaired successfully by the described technique. Post procedure, 3–5 days of lower volume, recumbent PD exchanges were performed prior to full-dose PD. No perioperative complications or leaks were noted. All PDCs were patent at 6 months. One patient required laparoscopy for recurrent omental wrapping 3 months post intervention.

          Conclusions

          PDC salvage in this manner is a cost-effective alternative to laparoscopic repair of PDCs failing catheter manipulation. The infection barrier afforded by the original superficial cuff and subcutaneous tunnel is maintained. PD can be resumed immediately. Only refractory cases need laparoscopy. This procedure allows for a more definitive correction of catheter migration and obstruction, avoids placement of a new PDC or temporary hemodialysis, is cost-effective and expands percutaneous options for dysfunctional PD catheters.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A laparoscopic method for optimal peritoneal dialysis access.

          Both medical benefits to the patient and financial incentives to the health care system exist to increase the use of peritoneal dialysis as renal replacement therapy. Providing long-term peritoneal access free of mechanical dysfunction continues to represent a major challenge to the success of this modality. Variable outcomes result from the lack of standard implantation methodology and failure to address persistent problems associated with current implantation techniques. This prospective case study compared noninfectious procedural complications of three approaches to establish peritoneal dialysis access. The groups consisted of 63 catheters implanted by traditional open dissection, 78 catheters implanted by basic laparoscopy without associated interventions, and 200 catheters implanted by advanced laparoscopic methods including rectus sheath tunneling, selective prophylactic omentopexy, and selective adhesiolysis. Mechanical flow obstruction, the major outcome indicator, followed only 1 of 200 (0.5%) implantation procedures in the advanced group and was significantly better (P < 0.0001) than the open dissection (17.5%) and basic laparoscopic (12.5%) groups. A low rate of pericannular leaks (1.3-2%) was not different for the three groups. One pericannular hernia occurred in the open group. Catheter mechanical dysfunction attributable to the surgical technique can nearly be eliminated through adjunctive procedures made possible only by a laparoscopic approach.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A comparative analysis of percutaneous and open surgical techniques for peritoneal catheter placement.

            Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is the preferred available option of renal replacement therapy for a significant number of end-stage kidney disease patients. A major limiting factor to the successful continuation of PD is the long-term viability of the PD catheter (PDC). Bedside percutaneous placement of the PDC is not commonly practiced despite published data encouraging use of this technique. Its advantages include faster recovery and avoidance of general anesthesia.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Radiological versus surgical implantation of first catheter for peritoneal dialysis: a randomized non-inferiority trial.

              The success of peritoneal dialysis (PD) is dependent on timely and adequate PD catheter access. In many centres, including our own, PD catheter insertion technique has evolved by laparoscopic surgery. An alternative method of catheter insertion is performed by radiologists using a percutaneous modified Seldinger technique under fluoroscopic guidance. However, there are no clinical trials comparing these two methods of catheter insertion.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Kidney J
                Clin Kidney J
                ckj
                ndtplus
                Clinical Kidney Journal
                Oxford University Press
                2048-8505
                2048-8513
                June 2014
                June 2014
                : 7
                : 3
                : 264-268
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Clinical and Interventional Nephrology, San Antonio Kidney Disease Center , San Antonio, TX, USA
                [2 ]Clinical Nephrology, San Antonio Kidney Disease Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio , San Antonio, TX, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence and offprint requests to: Rajeev Narayan; E-mail: renalraj@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                sfu042
                10.1093/ckj/sfu042
                4377760
                141aa5cf-89fb-454c-8544-9a560debd042
                © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 21 March 2014
                : 18 April 2014
                Categories
                Original Contributions
                Original Articles

                Nephrology
                catheter dysfunction,catheter migration,fluoroscopy,peritoneal dialysis catheter,peritoneal dialysis catheter salvage

                Comments

                Comment on this article