18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A robotic object hitting task to quantify sensorimotor impairments in participants with stroke

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Existing clinical scores of upper limb function often use observer-based ordinal scales that are subjective and commonly have floor and ceiling effects. The purpose of the present study was to develop an upper limb motor task to assess objectively the ability of participants to select and engage motor actions with both hands.

          Methods

          A bilateral robotic system was used to quantify upper limb sensorimotor function of participants with stroke. Participants performed an object hit task that required them to hit virtual balls moving towards them in the workspace with virtual paddles attached to each hand. Task difficulty was initially low, but increased with time by increasing the speed and number of balls in the workspace. Data were collected from 262 control participants and 154 participants with recent stroke.

          Results

          Control participants hit ~60 to 90% of the 300 balls with relatively symmetric performance for the two arms. Participants with recent stroke performed the task with most participants hitting fewer balls than 95% of healthy controls (67% of right-affected and 87% of left-affected strokes). Additionally, nearly all participants (97%) identified with visuospatial neglect hit fewer balls than healthy controls. More detailed analyses demonstrated that most participants with stroke displayed asymmetric performance between their affected and non-affected limbs with regards to number of balls hit, workspace area covered by the limb and hand speed. Inter-rater reliability of task parameters was high with half of the correlations above 0.90. Significant correlations were observed between many of the task parameters and the Functional Independence Measure and/or the Behavioural Inattention Test.

          Conclusions

          As this object hit task requires just over two minutes to complete, it provides an objective and easy approach to quantify upper limb motor function and visuospatial skills following stroke.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke.

            The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) is a new time-based method to evaluate upper extremity performance while providing insight into joint-specific and total limb movements. This study addresses selected psychometric attributes of the WMFT applied to a chronic stroke population. Nineteen individuals after stroke and with intact cognition and sitting balance were age- and sex-matched with 19 individuals without impairment. Subjects performed the WMFT and the upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA) on 2 occasions (12 to 16 days apart), with scoring performed independently by 2 random raters. The WMFT and FMA demonstrated agreement (P 0.05) from the dominant and nondominant extremities of individuals without impairment. The WMFT and FMA scores were related (P<0.02) for the more affected extremity in individuals after stroke. The interrater reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity of the WMFT, as used in these subject samples, are supported.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Development of a behavioral test of visuospatial neglect.

              The Rivermead Behavioral Inattention Test (RBIT), consisting of nine items sampling activities of daily living, was administered to 28 patients after unilateral right (20) or left (8) cerebrovascular accidents, and to 14 non-brain-damaged controls. All patients were tested on two parallel forms of the RBIT with order of presentation balanced and on at least two of six conventional tests of visual neglect. Control subjects were tested on either form 1 or form 2 of the RBIT. Interrater reliability of scoring was tested on seven subjects chosen at random. Using control scores to determine the cutoff point between visual inattention and noninattention, 14 patients (50%) showed evidence of visuospatial neglect on the RBIT. Correlation between the two forms of the test was 0.83. The RBIT also correlated well with five of the conventional tests. Interrater reliability was 100%. The RBIT appears to be a valid and reliable test of visuospatial neglect and one which is likely to provide more information about everyday problems than existing measures of neglect.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Neuroeng Rehabil
                J Neuroeng Rehabil
                Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
                BioMed Central
                1743-0003
                2014
                2 April 2014
                : 11
                : 47
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Computing, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
                [2 ]Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
                [3 ]University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
                [4 ]Providence Care, St. Mary’s of the Lake Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada
                [5 ]Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
                [6 ]Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
                Article
                1743-0003-11-47
                10.1186/1743-0003-11-47
                3992166
                24693877
                14373739-30bd-4193-8559-7df1800c0359
                Copyright © 2014 Tyryshkin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

                History
                : 15 February 2013
                : 6 February 2014
                Categories
                Research

                Neurosciences
                stroke,assessment,motor skills,robotics,rehabilitation
                Neurosciences
                stroke, assessment, motor skills, robotics, rehabilitation

                Comments

                Comment on this article