14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Role of imaging in the evaluation of renal dysfunction in heart failure patients

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Heart failure and kidney disease share common pathophysiological pathways which can lead to mutual dysfunction, known as cardiorenal syndrome. In heart failure patients, renal impairment is related to hemodynamic and non-hemodynamic factors. Both decreased renal blood flow and renal venous congestion due to heart failure could lead to impaired renal function. Kidney disease and worsening renal function are independently associated with poor prognosis in heart failure patients, both in acute and chronic clinical settings. The aim of this review is to assess the role of renal imaging modalities in the evaluation and management of heart failure patients. Renal imaging techniques could complete laboratory data, as estimated glomerular filtration rate, exploring different pathophysiological factors involved in kidney disease and adding valuable information about renal structure and function. In particular, Doppler examination of arterial and venous hemodynamics is a feasible and non invasive technique, which has proven to be a reliable method for prognostic stratification in patients with cardiorenal syndrome. The renal resistance index, a measure related to renal hemodynamics, can be calculated from the Doppler evaluation of arterial flow. Moreover, the analysis of Doppler venous flow patterns can integrate information from the arterial study and evaluate renal congestion. Other imaging modalities are promising, but still confined to research purposes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cardiorenal syndrome.

          The term cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) increasingly has been used without a consistent or well-accepted definition. To include the vast array of interrelated derangements, and to stress the bidirectional nature of heart-kidney interactions, we present a new classification of the CRS with 5 subtypes that reflect the pathophysiology, the time-frame, and the nature of concomitant cardiac and renal dysfunction. CRS can be generally defined as a pathophysiologic disorder of the heart and kidneys whereby acute or chronic dysfunction of 1 organ may induce acute or chronic dysfunction of the other. Type 1 CRS reflects an abrupt worsening of cardiac function (e.g., acute cardiogenic shock or decompensated congestive heart failure) leading to acute kidney injury. Type 2 CRS comprises chronic abnormalities in cardiac function (e.g., chronic congestive heart failure) causing progressive chronic kidney disease. Type 3 CRS consists of an abrupt worsening of renal function (e.g., acute kidney ischemia or glomerulonephritis) causing acute cardiac dysfunction (e.g., heart failure, arrhythmia, ischemia). Type 4 CRS describes a state of chronic kidney disease (e.g., chronic glomerular disease) contributing to decreased cardiac function, cardiac hypertrophy, and/or increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Type 5 CRS reflects a systemic condition (e.g., sepsis) causing both cardiac and renal dysfunction. Biomarkers can contribute to an early diagnosis of CRS and to a timely therapeutic intervention. The use of this classification can help physicians characterize groups of patients, provides the rationale for specific management strategies, and allows the design of future clinical trials with more accurate selection and stratification of the population under investigation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Importance of venous congestion for worsening of renal function in advanced decompensated heart failure.

            To determine whether venous congestion, rather than impairment of cardiac output, is primarily associated with the development of worsening renal function (WRF) in patients with advanced decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Reduced cardiac output is traditionally believed to be the main determinant of WRF in patients with ADHF. A total of 145 consecutive patients admitted with ADHF treated with intensive medical therapy guided by pulmonary artery catheter were studied. We defined WRF as an increase of serum creatinine >/=0.3 mg/dl during hospitalization. In the study cohort (age 57 +/- 14 years, cardiac index 1.9 +/- 0.6 l/min/m(2), left ventricular ejection fraction 20 +/- 8%, serum creatinine 1.7 +/- 0.9 mg/dl), 58 patients (40%) developed WRF. Patients who developed WRF had a greater central venous pressure (CVP) on admission (18 +/- 7 mm Hg vs. 12 +/- 6 mm Hg, p < 0.001) and after intensive medical therapy (11 +/- 8 mm Hg vs. 8 +/- 5 mm Hg, p = 0.04). The development of WRF occurred less frequently in patients who achieved a CVP <8 mm Hg (p = 0.01). Furthermore, the ability of CVP to stratify risk for development of WRF was apparent across the spectrum of systemic blood pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, cardiac index, and estimated glomerular filtration rates. Venous congestion is the most important hemodynamic factor driving WRF in decompensated patients with advanced heart failure.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Increased central venous pressure is associated with impaired renal function and mortality in a broad spectrum of patients with cardiovascular disease.

              We sought to investigate the relationship between increased central venous pressure (CVP), renal function, and mortality in a broad spectrum of cardiovascular patients. The pathophysiology of impaired renal function in cardiovascular disease is multifactorial. The relative importance of increased CVP has not been addressed previously. A total of 2,557 patients who underwent right heart catheterization in the University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands, between January 1, 1989, and December 31, 2006, were identified, and their data were extracted from electronic databases. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was assessed with the simplified modification of diet in renal disease formula. Mean age was 59 +/- 15 years, and 57% were men. Mean eGFR was 65 +/- 24 ml/min/1.73 m(2), with a cardiac index of 2.9 +/- 0.8 l/min/m(2) and CVP of 5.9 +/- 4.3 mm Hg. We found that CVP was associated with cardiac index (r = -0.259, p < 0.0001) and eGFR (r = -0.147, p < 0.0001). Also, cardiac index was associated with eGFR (r = 0.123, p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis CVP remained associated with eGFR (r = -0.108, p < 0.0001). In a median follow-up time of 10.7 years, 741 (29%) patients died. We found that CVP was an independent predictor of reduced survival (hazard ratio: 1.03 per mm Hg increase, 95% confidence interval: 1.01 to 1.05, p = 0.0032). Increased CVP is associated with impaired renal function and independently related to all-cause mortality in a broad spectrum of patients with cardiovascular disease.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                World J Nephrol
                WJN
                World Journal of Nephrology
                Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
                2220-6124
                6 May 2017
                6 May 2017
                : 6
                : 3
                : 123-131
                Affiliations
                Dario Grande, Paola Terlizzese, School of Cardiology, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
                Massimo Iacoviello, Cardiology Unit, Cardiothoracic Department, Policlinic University Hospital, 70124 Bari, Italy
                Author notes

                Author contributions: Grande D and Terlizzese P reviewed the literature concerning the review; Grande D, Terlizzese P and Iacoviello M contributed to the writing and revision of the paper and finally approved the submitted version; Iacoviello M decided the structure and contents of the review.

                Correspondence to: Massimo Iacoviello, MD, PhD, FESC, FANMCO, Cardiology Unit, Cardiothoracic Department, Policlinic University Hospital, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy. massimo.iacoviello@ 123456policlinico.ba.it

                Telephone: +39-080-5478622 Fax: +39-080-5478796

                Article
                jWJN.v6.i3.pg123
                10.5527/wjn.v6.i3.123
                5424434
                28540202
                14532687-d1a1-4453-b63f-ba9d4de2d55a
                ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

                This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.

                History
                : 24 October 2016
                : 13 December 2016
                : 28 February 2017
                Categories
                Minireviews

                heart failure,doppler,renal resistance index,hemodynamics,venous doppler,prognosis,cardiorenal syndrome,chronic kidney disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article