13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      No Effect of Commercial Cognitive Training on Brain Activity, Choice Behavior, or Cognitive Performance

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Increased preference for immediate over delayed rewards and for risky over certain rewards has been associated with unhealthy behavioral choices. Motivated by evidence that enhanced cognitive control can shift choice behavior away from immediate and risky rewards, we tested whether training executive cognitive function could influence choice behavior and brain responses. In this randomized controlled trial, 128 young adults (71 male, 57 female) participated in 10 weeks of training with either a commercial web-based cognitive training program or web-based video games that do not specifically target executive function or adapt the level of difficulty throughout training. Pretraining and post-training, participants completed cognitive assessments and functional magnetic resonance imaging during performance of the following validated decision-making tasks: delay discounting (choices between smaller rewards now vs larger rewards in the future) and risk sensitivity (choices between larger riskier rewards vs smaller certain rewards). Contrary to our hypothesis, we found no evidence that cognitive training influences neural activity during decision-making; nor did we find effects of cognitive training on measures of delay discounting or risk sensitivity. Participants in the commercial training condition improved with practice on the specific tasks they performed during training, but participants in both conditions showed similar improvement on standardized cognitive measures over time. Moreover, the degree of improvement was comparable to that observed in individuals who were reassessed without any training whatsoever. Commercial adaptive cognitive training appears to have no benefits in healthy young adults above those of standard video games for measures of brain activity, choice behavior, or cognitive performance.

          SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Engagement of neural regions and circuits important in executive cognitive function can bias behavioral choices away from immediate rewards. Activity in these regions may be enhanced through adaptive cognitive training. Commercial brain training programs claim to improve a broad range of mental processes; however, evidence for transfer beyond trained tasks is mixed. We undertook the first randomized controlled trial of the effects of commercial adaptive cognitive training (Lumosity) on neural activity and decision-making in young adults ( N = 128) compared with an active control (playing on-line video games). We found no evidence for relative benefits of cognitive training with respect to changes in decision-making behavior or brain response, or for cognitive task performance beyond those specifically trained.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Neurosci
          J. Neurosci
          jneuro
          jneurosci
          J. Neurosci
          The Journal of Neuroscience
          Society for Neuroscience
          0270-6474
          1529-2401
          2 August 2017
          2 February 2018
          : 37
          : 31
          : 7390-7402
          Affiliations
          [1] 1Departments of Psychology and
          [2] 2Psychiatry, and
          [3] 3Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, and
          [4] 4Department of Digital Media, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
          Author notes
          Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Joseph W. Kable, Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, 3720 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104. kable@ 123456psych.upenn.edu

          Author contributions: J.W.K., R.A., J.A.-M., R.H., P.D., F.J.L., and C.L. designed research; J.W.K., M.K.C., M.M., L.B., T.P., and N.C. performed research; J.W.K., M.K.C., M.F., M.M., T.P., R.A., and C.L. analyzed data; J.W.K., M.K.C., M.F., M.M., L.B., T.P., N.C., R.A., J.A.-M., R.H., P.D., F.J.L., and C.L. wrote the paper.

          Author information
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8451-2438
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2148-8805
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6897-5096
          Article
          PMC5546110 PMC5546110 5546110 2832-16
          10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2832-16.2017
          5546110
          28694338
          1465c855-bd78-4ec6-ab24-efb2412ae21c
          Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/377390-13$15.00/0
          History
          : 8 September 2016
          : 12 May 2017
          : 23 May 2017
          Categories
          Research Articles
          Behavioral/Cognitive

          cognitive training,delay discounting,impulsivity,neuroimaging,working memory

          Comments

          Comment on this article