13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessing shortfalls and complementary conservation areas for national plant biodiversity in South Korea

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Protected areas (PAs) are often considered the most important biodiversity conservation areas in national plans, but PAs often do not represent national-scale biodiversity. We evaluate the current conservation status of plant biodiversity within current existing PAs, and identify potential additional PAs for South Korea. We modeled species ranges for 2,297 plant species using Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines and compared the level of mean range representation in South Korea’s existing PAs, which comprise 5.7% of the country’s mainland area, with an equal-area alternative PA strategy selected with the reserve algorithm Marxan. We also used Marxan to model two additional conservation scenarios that add lands to approach the Aichi Biodiversity Target objectives (17% of the country). Existing PAs in South Korea contain an average of 6.3% of each plant species’ range, compared to 5.9% in the modeled equal-area alternative. However, existing PAs primarily represent a high percentage of the ranges for high-elevation and small range size species. The additional PAs scenario that adds lands to the existing PAs covers 14,587.55 km 2, and would improve overall plant range representation to a mean of 16.8% of every species’ range. The other additional PAs scenario, which selects new PAs from all lands and covers 13,197.35 km 2, would improve overall plant range representation to a mean of 13.5%. Even though the additional PAs that includes existing PAs represents higher percentages of species’ ranges, it is missing many biodiversity hotspots in non-mountainous areas and the additional PAs without locking in the existing PAs represent almost all species’ ranges evenly, including low-elevation ones with larger ranges. Some priority conservation areas we identified are expansions of, or near, existing PAs, especially in northeastern and southern South Korea. However, lowland coastal areas and areas surrounding the capital city, Seoul, are also critical for biodiversity conservation in South Korea.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Will plant movements keep up with climate change?

          In the face of anthropogenic climate change, species must acclimate, adapt, move, or die. Although some species are moving already, their ability to keep up with the faster changes expected in the future is unclear. 'Migration lag' is a particular concern with plants, because it could threaten both biodiversity and carbon storage. Plant movements are not realistically represented in models currently used to predict future vegetation and carbon-cycle feedbacks, so there is an urgent need to understand how much of a problem failure to track climate change is likely to be. Therefore, in this review, we compare how fast plants need to move with how fast they can move; that is, the velocity of climate change with the velocity of plant movement. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Policy development for biodiversity offsets: a review of offset frameworks.

            Biodiversity offsets seek to compensate for residual environmental impacts of planned developments after appropriate steps have been taken to avoid, minimize or restore impacts on site. Offsets are emerging as an increasingly employed mechanism for achieving net environmental benefits, with offset policies being advanced in a wide range of countries (i.e., United States, Australia, Brazil, Colombia, and South Africa). To support policy development for biodiversity offsets, we review a set of major offset policy frameworks-US wetlands mitigation, US conservation banking, EU Natura 2000, Australian offset policies in New South Wales, Victoria, and Western Australia, and Brazilian industrial and forest offsets. We compare how the frameworks define offset policy goals, approach the mitigation process, and address six key issues for implementing offsets: (1) equivalence of project impacts with offset gains; (2) location of the offset relative to the impact site; (3) "additionality" (a new contribution to conservation) and acceptable types of offsets; (4) timing of project impacts versus offset benefits; (5) offset duration and compliance; and (6) "currency" and mitigation replacement ratios. We find substantial policy commonalities that may serve as a sound basis for future development of biodiversity offsets policy. We also identify issues requiring further policy guidance, including how best to: (1) ensure conformance with the mitigation hierarchy; (2) identify the most environmentally preferable offsets within a landscape context; and (3) determine appropriate mitigation replacement ratios.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Using multivariate adaptive regression splines to predict the distributions of New Zealand's freshwater diadromous fish

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                23 February 2018
                2018
                : 13
                : 2
                : e0190754
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America
                [2 ] Department of Landscape Architecture & Rural System Engineering, College of Agriculture Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
                Leiden University, NETHERLANDS
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2130-1622
                Article
                PONE-D-17-15808
                10.1371/journal.pone.0190754
                5825007
                29474355
                146af451-6405-49df-9059-3d66166a46dc
                © 2018 Choe et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 24 April 2017
                : 15 December 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 1, Pages: 17
                Funding
                Funded by: Korea Environmental Industry and Technology Institute (KR)
                Award ID: No. 2014-001-310007
                Award Recipient :
                HC appreciates the UC Davis for the Provost’s Dissertation Year Fellowship, and South Korean government for the government scholarship. This work was supported by the Korea Environmental Industry and Technology Institute (KEITI; http://www.keiti.re.kr/en/index.do) grant funded by the Korean government (ME) (No. 2014-001-310007) to DL. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Conservation Biology
                Endangered Species
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Conservation Science
                Conservation Biology
                Endangered Species
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Conservation Science
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Biodiversity
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Biodiversity
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Plants
                People and places
                Geographical locations
                Asia
                South Korea
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecological Metrics
                Species Diversity
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecological Metrics
                Species Diversity
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Species Interactions
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Custom metadata
                The national ecosystem survey was conducted by the Korean Ministry of Environment, and authors do not have special access privileges to these data. The Korean National Institute of Ecology has uploaded these species data onto the ECObank website: http://ecobank.nie.re.kr/eclgySpceInfo/eclgySpceInfo.do. To access the plant data; 1. Click “레이어선택”, which is the third button to the left from the top right corner of the linked site; 2. Click “전국자연환경조사(3차)”, the fourth item down; 3. Click the grey box to the left of the fourth item, “식물상”, then click “ok”; 4. Click the top-right corner button; and 5. Click the fourth button “속성정보(점)” (this is the left-most button of the 2nd row of blue buttons); then, click on one of the orange-colored squares (observation points) on the screen. To download the species’ information, when the species list comes out, scroll all the way to the bottom of the list and click the blue button labelled “엑셀출력”. You can download species from this location in an Excel format. This download approach can be used for site-by-site data acquisition. For more information on these data, you can contact Dr. Namsin Kim ( geotop@ 123456nie.re.kr ) at the Korean National Institute of Ecology.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article