12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Writing Together to Get AHEAD: an interprofessional boot camp to support scholarly writing in the health professions

      research-article
      , MSLS, AHIP, , PhD, , PhD, RN, ANEF, FAAN
      Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
      Medical Library Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Writing for publication is an integral skill for both sharing research findings and career advancement, yet many faculty lack expertise, support, and time to author scholarly publications. Health professions educators identified writing as an area in which a new educators’ academy could offer support.

          Case Presentation

          To address this need, a writing task force was formed consisting of a librarian, a School of Medicine faculty member, and a School of Nursing faculty member. The task force launched two initiatives to motivate and support faculty writing and publication over two academic years. In the first year, a structured interprofessional “boot camp” consisting of a sequenced, modularized approach to manuscript completion was offered. In the second year, community building, in-person writing sessions, and incentives were added to the structured tasks. In year one, twenty participants enlisted in the boot camp, nine of whom completed a manuscript for submission by the end of the program. Qualitative feedback indicated potential improvements, which were put in place in the second program. In year two, twenty-eight participants enrolled, and eleven submitted thirteen manuscripts for publication by the end of the program.

          Conclusions

          Structured tasks, frequent deadlines, and professional editorial assistance were highly valued by participants. Time remains a barrier for faculty seeking to complete manuscripts. As experts in many facets of the publication process, librarians are well positioned to partner with others to facilitate faculty and staff development in writing.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Writing for publication in medical education: the benefits of a faculty development workshop and peer writing group.

          Although educational innovations in medical education are increasing in number, many educators do not submit their ideas for publication.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Promoting Faculty Scholarship – An evaluation of a program for busy clinician-educators

            Background Clinician educators face barriers to scholarship including lack of time, insufficient skills, and access to mentoring. An urban department of family medicine implemented a federally funded Scholars Program to increase the participants’ perceived confidence, knowledge and skills to conduct educational research. Method A part-time faculty development model provided modest protected time for one year to busy clinician educators. Scholars focused on designing, implementing, and writing about a scholarly project. Scholars participated in skill seminars, cohort and individual meetings, an educational poster fair and an annual writing retreat with consultation from a visiting professor. We assessed the increases in the quantity and quality of peer reviewed education scholarship. Data included pre- and post-program self-assessed research skills and confidence and semi-structured interviews. Further, data were collected longitudinally through a survey conducted three years after program participation to assess continued involvement in educational scholarship, academic presentations and publications. Results Ten scholars completed the program. Scholars reported that protected time, coaching by a coordinator, peer mentoring, engagement of project leaders, and involvement of a visiting professor increased confidence and ability to apply research skills. Participation resulted in academic presentations and publications and new educational leadership positions for several of the participants. Conclusions A faculty scholars program emphasizing multi-level mentoring and focused protected time can result in increased confidence, skills and scholarly outcomes at modest cost.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Peer Support of a Faculty “Writers' Circle” Increases Confidence and Productivity in Generating Scholarship

              Publishing is critical for academic medicine career advancement. Rejection of manuscripts can be demoralizing. Obstacles faced by clinical faculty may include lack of time, confidence, and optimal writing practices. This study describes the development and evaluation of a peer-writing group, informed by theory and research on faculty development and writing.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Med Libr Assoc
                J Med Libr Assoc
                mlab
                Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
                Medical Library Association (65 East Wacker Place, Suite 1900, Chicago, IL 60601-7246 )
                1536-5050
                1558-9439
                April 2017
                : 105
                : 2
                : 167-172
                Article
                jmla-105-167
                10.5195/jmla.2017.222
                5370609
                1493963b-402d-4022-9840-59dd3cd4ae1c
                Copyright: © 2017, Authors.

                Articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 01 August 2016
                : 01 October 2016
                Categories
                Case Study

                Comments

                Comment on this article