4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Optimization of Methods Verifying Volunteers’ Ability to Provide Hospice Care

      research-article
      1 , 2 , , 1
      Journal of Cancer Education
      Springer US
      Volunteer, Hospice, Method of verification

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The subject of the presented work was an attempt at optimization of the methods used for verification of the candidates for medical voluntary workers in a hospice and decreasing the danger of a negative influence of an incompetent volunteer on a person in a terminal stage of a disease and his or her relatives. The study was carried out in St. Lazarus Hospice in Krakow, Poland, and included 154 adult participants in four consecutive editions of “A course for volunteers – a guardian of the sick” organized by the hospice. In order to improve the recruitment of these workers, the hitherto methods of selection (an interview with the coordinator of volunteering and no less than 50% of attendance in classes of a preparatory course for volunteers”) were expanded by additional instruments—the tests whose usefulness was examined in practice. Knowledge of candidates was tested with the use of a written examination which consisted of four open questions and an MCQ test comprising 31 questions. Practical abilities were checked by the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). A reference point for the results of these tests was a hidden standardized long-term observation carried out during the subsequent work of the volunteers in the stationary ward in the hospice using the Amsterdam Attitude and Communication Scale (AACS). Among the tests used, the greatest value (confirmed by a quantitative and qualitative analysis) in predicting how a given person would cope with practical tasks and in contact with the sick and their relatives had a practical test of the OSCE type.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Assessment for selection for the health care professions and specialty training: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference.

          Assessment for selection in medicine and the health professions should follow the same quality assurance processes as in-course assessment. The literature on selection is limited and is not strongly theoretical or conceptual. For written testing, there is evidence of the predictive validity of Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) for medical school and licensing examination performance. There is also evidence for the predictive validity of grade point average, particularly in combination with MCAT for graduate entry but little evidence about the predictive validity of school leaver scores. Interviews have not been shown to be robust selection measures. Studies of multiple mini-interviews have indicated good predictive validity and reliability. Of other measures used in selection, only the growing interest in personality testing appears to warrant future work. Widening access to medical and health professional programmes is an increasing priority and relates to the social accountability mandate of medical and health professional schools. While traditional selection measures do discriminate against various population groups, there is little evidence on the effect of non-traditional measures in widening access. Preparation and outreach programmes show most promise. In summary, the areas of consensus for assessment for selection are small in number. Recommendations for future action focus on the adoption of principles of good assessment and curriculum alignment, use of multi-method programmatic approaches, development of interdisciplinary frameworks and utilisation of sophisticated measurement models. The social accountability mandate of medical and health professional schools demands that social inclusion, workforce issues and widening of access are embedded in the principles of good assessment for selection.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Understanding the volunteer market: the what, where, who and why of volunteering

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Comprehensive undergraduate medical assessments improve prediction of clinical performance.

              This study aimed to compare an essay-style undergraduate medical assessment with modified essay, multiple-choice question (MCQ) and objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) undergraduate medical assessments in predicting students' clinical performance (predictive validity), and to determine the relative contributions of the written (modified essay and MCQ) assessment and OSCE to predictive validity. Before and after cohort study. One medical school running a 6-year undergraduate course. Study participants included 137 Year 5 medical students followed into their trainee intern year. Aggregated global ratings by senior doctors, junior doctors and nurses as well as comprehensive structured assessments of performance in the trainee intern year. Students' scores in the new examinations predicted performance significantly better than scores in the old examinations, with correlation coefficients increasing from 0.05-0.44 to 0.41-0.81. The OSCE was a stronger predictor of subsequent performance than the written assessments but combining assessments had the strongest predictive validity. Using more comprehensive, more reliable and more authentic undergraduate assessment methods substantially increases predictive validity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                509 628 198 , marszeliga@gmail.com
                Journal
                J Cancer Educ
                J Cancer Educ
                Journal of Cancer Education
                Springer US (New York )
                0885-8195
                1543-0154
                14 December 2016
                14 December 2016
                2018
                : 33
                : 2
                : 470-476
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2162 9631, GRID grid.5522.0, Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, , Jagiellonian University Medical College, ; ul. św. Łazarza 16, 31-530 Krakow, Poland
                [2 ]St. Lazarus Hospice, Krakow, Poland
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8451-1283
                Article
                1154
                10.1007/s13187-016-1154-7
                5978891
                27966193
                14a340e4-d2a6-4062-b739-ab691a6e0fd3
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: KNOW Leading National Research Centre 2012-2017
                Award ID: KNOW9000479
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © American Association for Cancer Education 2018

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                volunteer,hospice,method of verification
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                volunteer, hospice, method of verification

                Comments

                Comment on this article