18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Treatment Patterns Among Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Six European Countries

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The objective of this study was to evaluate real-world treatment patterns of type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients initiating glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in Germany (GE), the United Kingdom (UK), France (FR), the Netherlands (NE), Belgium (BE), and Sweden (SE).

          Methods

          Adult T2D patients initiating exenatide twice daily (exBID), liraglutide once daily (LIRA) or exenatide once weekly (exQW) were identified using the IMS LifeLink™ (IMS Health, Danbury, CT, USA): Electronic Medical Records (EMR; GE/UK/FR) and IMS LifeLink™: longitudinal prescriptions (LRx; NE/BE/GE/UK) databases, and national health register data (SE), between 2010 and 2012. Therapy initiation date was termed ‘index date’. Eligible patients had ≥180-day pre- and variable follow-up (minimum ≥360-day post-index exBID and LIRA, ≥180-day post-index exQW). Treatment modification and persistence were evaluated over 180 days. Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models (PHMs; EMR databases only) evaluated stopping of the index therapy (measured as first of discontinuation or switch).

          Results

          30,206 exBID, 5,401 exQW, and 52,155 LIRA patients were included in the analysis (46.0–66.9% male; mean age range 55.4–59.3 years). Mean follow-up was 20.3–27.4 months for exBID and LIRA, and 7.6–13.9 months for exQW. Across the databases, the proportion experiencing a treatment modification at 180 days was highest among exBID (37.6–81.7%) compared to LIRA (36.8–56.6%) and exQW (32.3–47.7%). The proportion persistent at 180 days was lowest among exBID patients (46.8–73.5%) compared to LIRA (50.6–80.1%) or exQW (57.5–74.6%). In the KM analyses, LIRA patients had a lower proportion stopping therapy at all time points compared to exBID patients, across the databases. In the Cox PHMs, LIRA was associated with a significantly lower risk of stopping compared to exBID; in GE, exQW was associated with a lower risk compared to exBID and LIRA.

          Conclusion

          Treatment patterns varied among GLP-1 RA patients, with persistence highest among either LIRA or exQW across countries, and lowest among exBID. Longer-term data would be useful, particularly given limited exQW follow-up due to more recent launch.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-014-0087-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Pancreatic safety of incretin-based drugs--FDA and EMA assessment.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Ermittlung der tatsächlichen Tagesdosierung von Liraglutid (PDD) unter realen Versorgungsbedingungen im Hinblick auf die Berechnung von Tagestherapiekosten

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Ermittlung der tatsächlichen Tagesdosierung von Liraglutid (PDD) unter realen Versorgungsbedingungen im Hinblick auf die Berechnung von Tagestherapiekosten

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                vdivino@us.imshealth.com
                Journal
                Diabetes Ther
                Diabetes Ther
                Diabetes Therapy
                Springer Healthcare (Heidelberg )
                1869-6953
                1869-6961
                4 November 2014
                4 November 2014
                December 2014
                : 5
                : 2
                : 499-520
                Affiliations
                [ ]Health Economics and Outcomes Research Real-World Evidence Solutions, IMS Health, Fairfax, VA USA
                [ ]Global Patient Outcomes and Real World Evidence, Eli Lilly and Co, Surrey, UK
                [ ]Health Economics and Outcomes Research Real-World Evidence Solutions, IMS Health, Stockholm, Sweden
                Article
                87
                10.1007/s13300-014-0087-6
                4269654
                25366334
                1512ce6e-a032-4d47-b6fc-c31d7994e08d
                © The Author(s) 2014
                History
                : 29 August 2014
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Healthcare 2014

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                databases,diabetes mellitus,exenatide bid,exenatide qw,glucagon-like peptide 1,liraglutide,retrospective studies,treatment outcome,type 2/drug therapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article