20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      From the Editor’s Desk: Medline and Beyond

      editorial
      , ,
      McGill Journal of Medicine : MJM
      McGill University

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The one constant in medicine is constant change. As students, we appreciate the evolving nature of our understanding of diseases, their pathophysiologies and manifestations, their treatment modalities, and the lives they affect. The crucial role which clinicians play in this evolution is often underestimated and poorly understood. The clinician-scientist is, ultimately, the investigator who poses the relevant questions acquired from clinical experience, and who links the theories of the abstract realm with solutions of the concrete and tangible world. Thus, translational research, as the cliché goes, from the bedside to the bench, and evidently back again, is of utmost importance and interest to clinicians and medical students alike (1). THE CLINICIAN-SCIENTIST While clinician-scientists have some characteristics that set them apart from other researchers, their task is inherently different. With one foot in a clinical setting, and the other in a research setting, the clinician-scientist occupies a unique niche which brings about advantages, yet limitations. On the one hand, clinicians have irreplaceable insight into the patient setting (2). Their motivations for research are often aimed at finding solutions to problems faced in everyday life (3). In this sense, they bridge the theories of basic science, and applications in the clinical settings. In addition, from their medical training and practice, they are used to collaborating, working in large teams, and have a wide network of contacts. On the other hand, clinicians face great challenges- they have less time for training, writing grants and team management (2, 4). Research translates into time, resources, and expertise taken away from patient care. Yet, what a career! In which other field can one derive this dual satisfaction, one that stems both from the warm and personal interactions of medicine, and the intellectual process of asking and solving a question? INTERACTION OF CLINICAL PRACTICE AND SCIENCE: THE PLACEBO EFFECT The placebo effect, the theme of this issue’s Focus, is one example of a domain that has greatly benefited from collaborations between clinicians and scientists. For the first time in the history of the MJM, articles in this section were peer-reviewed by specialists in the field, through the organizing efforts of Dr. Amir Raz and Dr. Paul Clarke and our Focus Editor, Samuel Lapalme-Remis (McGill University). We are proud to feature articles by Dr. Kilhstrom (University of California Berkeley), Dr. Lichtenberg (Hadash Medical School, Israel), Dr. Loftus (University of Washington), Dr. Fries (Stanford University School of Medicine) and Dr. Kirsch (University of Hull, UK). THE MJM: OVER 10 YEARS OF CONTRIBUTION The MJM’s core mission, beyond encouraging student research, is to foster a scientific career and approach within future clinicians. The great advantage in exposing and inspiring students at an early stage is the training acquired. Students witness the mammoth efforts and, at times, the serendipity involved in achieving a single outcome. At the same time, students receive criticisms and realize where research was unsuccessful. We see where research results can be misleading; after trying to spin the results of our own research to their most marketable form, we learn how to take someone else’s paper with a grain of salt. Although, realistically, research performed in medical school is often not groundbreaking, the lessons learned remain. Studies have shown that students undertaking research experience during medical school are more likely to pursue an academic career (5, 6). With their interests sparked and curiosity piqued, they desire to delve deeper and inquire. MEDLINE AND BEYOND As the MJM moves forward in the early 21st century, it retains its central mission and mandate of promoting student research internationally and encouraging and inspiring students to pursue a career in research. The MJM is most proud to announce that we are now indexed in both PubMed/Medline and EMBASE, both invaluable resources for researchers and clinician-scientists internationally, and the perfect medium to showcase the efforts and successes of students. Currently, volumes 9 through 11 are indexed in PubMed/Medline and we endeavor to work in a retrograde fashion until the very first volume of the MJM. Indexing in Medline is a giant step for our student-based initiative. We are thrilled and excited to be acknowledged by the National Library of Medicine and hope that we continue to impress and publish solid research by students. The MJM is proud of its student contributors and is thankful for the support it has received from researchers globally. With indexing in the PubMed/Medline database, the MJM enters a new phase. We would like express our gratitude to Dr. Phil Gold, a clinician-scientist recognized for leadership in the field of Oncology and Immunology, for his help and advice. He is our Faculty Advisor and a supporter of the MJM since the earliest years. We dedicate this issue to all the previous MJM editorial teams whose efforts contributed to today’s publication, and to all medical students around the world, who are burgeoning in their field of research. We hope that you will be inspired to continue broadening your academic horizons. Regards, AYZ, AS, YG

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The physician-scientist career pipeline in 2005: build it, and they will come.

          Physician-scientists play a unique and critical role in medical research. Nonetheless, a number of trends followed during the 1980s and 1990s revealed that this career pathway was in serious jeopardy. Physician-scientists were declining in number and were getting older. A variety of factors were thought to contribute to this problem, including increasing indebtedness of medical school graduates caused by rapidly rising medical school tuition costs. To evaluate the impact of recently initiated programs from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and several not-for-profit institutions designed to revitalize the physician-scientist career pipeline. We assessed recent trends in the physician-scientist career pipeline using data obtained from the NIH, the American Medical Association, the Association of American Medical Colleges, and other sources. Total numbers of physicians performing research, grant application numbers and success rates for MDs, MD-PhDs, and PhDs at various stages in their careers, interest in research among medical students, medical school tuitions and postgraduate salaries, numbers and composition of applicants for NIH loan repayment programs, and gender distribution of young physician-scientists. The number of physician-scientists in the United States has been in a steady state for the past decade, but funded physician-scientists are significantly older than they were 2 decades ago. However, the study of early career markers over the past 7 to 10 years has demonstrated increasing interest in research careers by medical students, steady growth of the MD-PhD pool, and a new burst of activity in the "late bloomer" pool of MDs (individuals who choose research careers in medical school or in residency training), fueled by loan repayment programs that were created by the NIH in 2002. Several recent trends for more established physician-scientists have also suggested improvement. Although it is too early to assess the impact of these indicators on the long-term career pathway, the recent growth in activity in the physician-scientist career pipeline is an encouraging development. Continued funding of these new programs, coupled with sustained support for physician-scientists committed to the pathway, will be required to maintain these positive trends.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effect of two Howard Hughes Medical Institute research training programs for medical students on the likelihood of pursuing research careers.

            To assess the effect of Howard Hughes Medical Institute's (HHMI) two one-year research training programs for medical students on the awardees' research careers. Awardees of the HHMI Cloister Program who graduated between 1987 and 1995 and awardees of the HHMI Medical Fellows Program who graduated between 1991 and 1995 were compared with unsuccessful applicants to the programs and MD-PhD students who graduated during the same periods. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess research career outcomes while controlling for academic and demographic variables that could affect selection to the programs. Participation in both HHMI programs increased the likelihood of receiving National Institutes of Health postdoctoral support. Participation in the Cloister Program also increased the likelihood of receiving a faculty appointment with research responsibility at a medical school. In addition, awardees of the Medical Fellows Program were not significantly less likely than Medical Scientist Training Program (MSTP) and non-MSTP MD-PhD program participants to receive a National Institutes of Health postdoctoral award, and awardees of the Cloister Program were not significantly less likely than non-MSTP MD-PhD students to receive a faculty appointment with research responsibility. Women and underrepresented minority students were proportionally represented among awardees of the two HHMI programs whereas they were relatively underrepresented in MD-PhD programs. The one-year intensive research training supported by the HHMI training programs appears to provide an effective imprinting experience on medical students' research careers and to be an attractive strategy for training physician-scientists.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Impact of medical student research in the development of physician-scientists

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Mcgill J Med
                9710939
                McGill Journal of Medicine : MJM
                McGill University
                1201-026X
                November 2008
                : 11
                : 2
                : 113-114
                Article
                mjm11_2p113
                2582672
                19148307
                152d7012-e4aa-491a-a5c2-44dbc4e3441a
                Copyright © 2008 by MJM

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License, which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any digital medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. For details, please refer to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

                History
                Categories
                Editorial

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article