4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A comparison of the McGrath-MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for child tracheal intubation during resuscitation by paramedics. A randomized, crossover, manikin study.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Prehospital tracheal intubation by paramedics during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in children is challenging. The potential role of new intubation devices during CPR is unclear. Our objective was to assess the impact of CPR (with and without chest compressions [CCs]) on the success and time to intubation (TTI) with the Macintosh laryngoscope vs the McGrath video laryngoscope on a pediatric manikin.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Am J Emerg Med
          The American journal of emergency medicine
          1532-8171
          0735-6757
          Aug 2016
          : 34
          : 8
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
          [2 ] Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. Electronic address: zetrtrusz@gmail.com.
          [3 ] Department of Nephrologic Nursing, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
          [4 ] Department of Emergency Medicine Disaster Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
          [5 ] Pediatric Emergency and Critical Care Division and Institute of Investigation of Santiago (IDIS), Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, SERGAS, CLINURSID Investigation Group, Nursing Department, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, SAMID Network, Madrid, Spain.
          Article
          S0735-6757(15)01038-4
          10.1016/j.ajem.2015.11.060
          26712571
          155c0394-3771-4c65-a211-33ff93d72da3
          Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article