23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Diameters of the normal thoracic aorta measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging; correlation with gender, body surface area and body mass index

      abstract

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background Although it is widely accepted that obesity is related to increased aortic size, to date, there is no large study assessing the effect of obesity, in the absence of co-morbidities, on regional aortic diameter. In addition, despite the fact that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is generally regarded as the gold standard technique for imaging the aorta, the vast majority of data comes from 2D echo, which has marked limitations in the setting of obesity. As a result, we aimed to use MRI to 1) establish a large gender specific normal database of reference diameters for the aorta and 2) investigate the effect of increasing body surface area (BSA) on aortic size. Methods 484 subjects (230 male, 254 female), age 19-70 years without identifiable cardiac risk factors (BMI range 15.7 - 52.6) underwent MRI to determine aortic diameter at three levels namely; the ascending aorta (Ao) and proximal descending aorta (PDA, pulmonary artery level), and the abdominal aorta (DDA, 12 cm below the PDA level). In addition, 208 of the subjects had aortic root measurements performed at the aortic valve annulus, aortic sinuses and sino-tubular junction. Results All subjects were normotensive (SBP 121±12, DBP 75±9 mmHg), normoglycaemic (4.8±0.5 mmol/l) and normocholesterolaemic (4.9±0.8 mmol/l) on the day of scanning. As expected, with increasing BSA, aortic root diameter increased at all levels measured (AV annulus ♂+5.5, ♀+4.4 mm, Aortic Sinus ♂+5.1, ♀+4.2 mm, ST-junction ♂+5.7, ♀+4.4 mm all per m2 (BSA) increase, Table 1, Figure 1). No gender difference in the degree of dilatation with increasing BSA was seen (p>0.5). Aortic diameters at the more distal aortic levels also increased with increasing BSA (Ao, ♂+6.5, ♀+6.1 mm, PDA ♂+4.4, +♀3.4, DDA ♂+3.2, ♀+3.3 mm, all per m2 BSA increase, Figure 1). Again, no gender differences in the degree of dilatation were seen (p>0.5 for all analyses). However, the degree of regional aortic dilatation in both male and female obesity without co-morbidities was minor (AV annulus ♂+0.17, ♀+0.08 mm, ST junction ♂+0.16, ♀ +0.19 mm, Ao ♂+0.21, ♀+0.18 mm, PDA ♂+0.16, ♀ +0.09 mm, DDA ♂+0.15, ♀+0.09 mm, per BMI point increase, p<0.05 for all analyses). Table 1 Gender Specific Effects of Obesity on Regional Aortic Diameter - Data Presented as Mean With Normal Range (+/- 2SD) Male Aortic Diameter (mm) Normal Weight Overweight Obese ANOVA p Aortic Valve Annulus 24.0 (18.8-29.2) 24.7 (19.5-29.9) 25.7 (20.7-30.7) <0.05 Sinus of Valsalva 32.2 (24.6-39.8) 32.9 (25.3-40.5) 33.3 (25.3-31.3) <0.05 Sino-tubular Junction 24.9 (18.1-31.7) 25.8 (17.0-34.6) 25.9 (19.1-32.7) <0.05 Ascending Aorta 26.6 (18.2-35.0) 27.8 (18.8-36.8 28.6 (23.2-34.0) <0.01 Proximal Descending Aorta 20.4 (14.6-26.2) 21.2 (15.6-26.8) 22.1 (16.5-27.7) <0.01 Distal Descending Aorta 17.4 (12.0-22.8) 18.3 (12.7-23.9) 19.0 (14.8-23.2) <0.01 BMI (kg/m2) 22 +/-1.7 27 +/-1.6 34 +/-4.8 <0.01 BSA (m2) 1.9 (+/-0.1) 2.0 (+/-0.1) 2.3 (+/-0.2) <0.01 Female Aortic Diameter (mm Normal Weight Overweight Obese ANOVA p Aortic Valve Annulus 20.2 (17.0-23.4) 21.7 (18.5-23.9) 21.6 (17.6-25.6) <0.01 Sinus of Valsalva 27.6 (22.0-33.2) 28.6 (21.6-35.6) 27.8 (22.2-33.4) <0.05 Sino-tubular Junction 21.7 (16.7-26.7) 22.5 (16.5-28.5) 22.3 (16.5-28.1) <0.05 Ascending Aorta 24.8 (17.6-32.0) 26.7 (19.3-34.1) 26.9 (19.3-34.5) <0.01 Proximal Descending Aorta 18.6 (14.6-22.6) 19.5 (14.9-24.1) 20.1 (15.5-24.7) <0.01 Distal Descending Aorta 16.1 (14.1-18.1) 16.9 (14.7-19.1) 17.6 (15.7-19.5) <0.01 BMI (kg/m2) 22.0 (+/-1.6) 27.0 (+/-1.5) 37.0 (+/-4.8) <0.01 BSA (m2) 1.7 (+/-0.1) 1.8 (+/-0.1) 2.0 (+/-0.2) <0.01 Figure 1 The effect of gender on the relationship between regional aortic diameter and body surface area. Conclusions Aortic diameters were larger in males than females at all levels measured. Across both genders, obesity, in the absence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, is characterized by a minor degree of aortic dilatation. There are no significant gender differences in the degree of dilatation with increasing obesity. Funding The study was supported by grants from the British Heart Foundation and Wellcome Trust and by the Oxford Partnership Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre with funding from the Department of Health's NIHR Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme. SN acknowledges support from the Oxford BHF Centre of Research Excellence

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Conference
          J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
          J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
          Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
          BioMed Central
          1097-6647
          1532-429X
          2013
          30 January 2013
          : 15
          : Suppl 1
          : E77
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Oxford Centre for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
          [2 ]Oxford Clinical Cardiovascular Research Facility, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
          Article
          1532-429X-15-S1-E77
          10.1186/1532-429X-15-S1-E77
          3559315
          1570a039-8d37-4fd8-a224-393f4164db82
          Copyright ©2013 Davis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

          16th Annual SCMR Scientific Sessions
          San Francisco, CA, USA
          31 January-3 February 2013
          History
          Categories
          Poster Presentation

          Cardiovascular Medicine
          Cardiovascular Medicine

          Comments

          Comment on this article