5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Attention and Capacity Limits in Perception: A Cellular Metabolism Account

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Limits on perceptual capacity result in various phenomena of inattentional blindness. Here we propose a neurophysiological account attributing these perceptual capacity limits directly to limits on cerebral cellular metabolism. We hypothesized that overall cerebral energy supply remains constant, regardless of overall mental processing demands; therefore, an attention mechanism is required to regulate limited cellular metabolism levels in line with attended task demands. Increased perceptual load in a task (imposing a greater demand on neural computations) should thus result in increased metabolism underlying attended processing, and reduced metabolism mediating unattended processing. We tested this prediction measuring oxidation states of cytochrome c oxidase (oxCCO), an intracellular marker of cellular metabolism. Broadband near-infrared spectroscopy was used to record oxCCO levels from human visual cortex while participants (both sexes) performed a rapid sequential visual search task under either high perceptual load (complex feature-conjunction search) or low load (feature pop-out search). A task-irrelevant, peripheral checkerboard was presented on a random half of trials. Our findings showed that oxCCO levels in visual cortex regions responsive to the attended-task stimuli were increased in high versus low perceptual load, whereas oxCCO levels related to unattended processing were significantly reduced. A negative temporal correlation of these load effects further supported our metabolism trade-off account. These results demonstrate an attentional compensation mechanism that regulates cellular metabolism levels according to processing demands. Moreover, they provide novel evidence for the widely held stipulation that overall cerebral metabolism levels remain constant regardless of mental task demand and establish a neurophysiological account for capacity limits in perception.

          SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We investigated whether capacity limits in perception can be explained by the effects of attention on the allocation of limited cellular metabolic energy for perceptual processing. We measured the oxidation state of cytochrome c oxidase, an intracellular measure of metabolism, in human visual cortex during task performance. The results showed increased levels of cellular metabolism associated with attended processing and reduced levels of metabolism underlying unattended processing when the task was more demanding. A temporal correlation between these effects supported an attention-directed metabolism trade-off. These findings support an account for inattentional blindness grounded in cellular biochemistry. They also provide novel evidence for the claim that cerebral processing is limited by a constant energy supply, which thus requires attentional regulation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Visual attention: the past 25 years.

          This review focuses on covert attention and how it alters early vision. I explain why attention is considered a selective process, the constructs of covert attention, spatial endogenous and exogenous attention, and feature-based attention. I explain how in the last 25 years research on attention has characterized the effects of covert attention on spatial filters and how attention influences the selection of stimuli of interest. This review includes the effects of spatial attention on discriminability and appearance in tasks mediated by contrast sensitivity and spatial resolution; the effects of feature-based attention on basic visual processes, and a comparison of the effects of spatial and feature-based attention. The emphasis of this review is on psychophysical studies, but relevant electrophysiological and neuroimaging studies and models regarding how and where neuronal responses are modulated are also discussed. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

            The ability to remain focused on goal-relevant stimuli in the presence of potentially interfering distractors is crucial for any coherent cognitive function. However, simply instructing people to ignore goal-irrelevant stimuli is not sufficient for preventing their processing. Recent research reveals that distractor processing depends critically on the level and type of load involved in the processing of goal-relevant information. Whereas high perceptual load can eliminate distractor processing, high load on "frontal" cognitive control processes increases distractor processing. These findings provide a resolution to the long-standing early and late selection debate within a load theory of attention that accommodates behavioural and neuroimaging data within a framework that integrates attention research with executive function.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.

              A load theory of attention in which distractor rejection depends on the level and type of load involved in current processing was tested. A series of experiments demonstrates that whereas high perceptual load reduces distractor interference, working memory load or dual-task coordination load increases distractor interference. These findings suggest 2 selective attention mechanisms: a perceptual selection mechanism serving to reduce distractor perception in situations of high perceptual load that exhaust perceptual capacity in processing relevant stimuli and a cognitive control mechanism that reduces interference from perceived distractors as long as cognitive control functions are available to maintain current priorities (low cognitive load). This theory resolves the long-standing early versus late selection debate and clarifies the role of cognitive control in selective attention. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Neurosci
                J. Neurosci
                jneuro
                jneurosci
                J. Neurosci
                The Journal of Neuroscience
                Society for Neuroscience
                0270-6474
                1529-2401
                26 August 2020
                26 August 2020
                : 40
                : 35
                : 6801-6811
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, United Kingdom
                [2] 2Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                Correspondence should be addressed to Merit Bruckmaier at merit.bruckmaier.16@ 123456ucl.ac.uk

                Author contributions: M.B. and N.L. designed research; M.B. and N.L. performed research; M.B. analyzed data; M.B. and N.L. wrote the first draft of the paper; M.B., I.T., and N.L. edited the paper; M.B. and N.L. wrote the paper; I.T. and P.P. contributed unpublished reagents/analytic tools.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3084-9462
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5274-0535
                Article
                JN-RM-2368-19
                10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2368-19.2020
                7455219
                32747442
                15949a22-acad-42ba-a37d-37823567b0a7
                Copyright © 2020 Bruckmaier et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

                History
                : 3 October 2019
                : 10 June 2020
                : 18 June 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Economic and Social Research Council (RCUK) with Toyota Motor Europe (Co-funded Studentship)
                Award ID: ES/J500185/1
                Funded by: http://doi.org/10.13039/100010269Wellcome Trust (Wellcome)
                Award ID: 104580/Z/14/Z
                Categories
                Research Articles
                Behavioral/Cognitive

                attention,capacity limits in visual perception,cerebral metabolism,inattentional blindness,load theory,oxcco

                Comments

                Comment on this article