21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Knowledge and skills retention following Emergency Triage, Assessment and Treatment plus Admission course for final year medical students in Rwanda: a longitudinal cohort study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aim

          To determine whether, after the Emergency Triage, Assessment and Treatment plus Admission (ETAT+) course, a comprehensive paediatric life support course, final year medical undergraduates in Rwanda would achieve a high level of knowledge and practical skills and if these were retained. To guide further course development, student feedback was obtained.

          Methods

          Longitudinal cohort study of knowledge and skills of all final year medical undergraduates at the University of Rwanda in academic year 2011–2012 who attended a 5-day ETAT+ course. Students completed a precourse knowledge test. Knowledge and clinical skills assessments, using standardised marking, were performed immediately postcourse and 3–9 months later. Feedback was obtained using printed questionnaires.

          Results

          84 students attended the course and re-evaluation. Knowledge test showed a significant improvement, from median 47% to 71% correct answers (p<0.001). For two clinical skills scenarios, 98% passed both scenarios, 37% after a retake, 2% failed both scenarios. Three to nine months later, students were re-evaluated, median score for knowledge test 67%, not significantly different from postcourse (p>0.1). For clinical skills, 74% passed, with 32% requiring a retake, 8% failed after retake, 18% failed both scenarios, a significant deterioration (p<0.0001).

          Conclusions

          Students performed well on knowledge and skills immediately after a comprehensive ETAT+ course. Knowledge was maintained 3–9 months later. Clinical skills, which require detailed sequential steps, declined, but most were able to perform them satisfactorily after feedback. The course was highly valued, but several short courses and more practical teaching were advocated.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evaluation of staff's retention of ACLS and BLS skills.

          To test registered nurses' abilities to retain basic or advanced life support psychomotor skills and theoretical knowledge. A repeated-measures, quasi-experimental design was used. Written and performance tests (initial, post-training, and final testing) used scenarios requiring performance of advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) or basic life support (BLS) skills. Final testing was by random assignment to 3, 6, 9, or 12 months. A convenience sample (n=133) was used. American Heart Association 2000 ACLS and BLS evaluation tools were used in a simulated testing environment. Findings show nurses retain theoretical knowledge but performance skills degrade quickly. ACLS skills degrade faster than BLS skills with 63% passing BLS at 3 months and 58% at 12 months. Only 30% of participants passed ACLS skills at 3 months and 14% at 12 months. These findings are similar to the results of other investigators in over a decade of research. Study results showed a decline in skills retention with nurses unable to perform ACLS and BLS skills to standard for the entire certification period. The need for more frequent refresher training is needed. No formal research at this institution indicates skill degradation adversely affected patient outcomes. Further research on ACLS and BLS course content, design, management, and execution is needed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A systematic review of retention of adult advanced life support knowledge and skills in healthcare providers.

            Advanced life support (ALS) guidelines are widely adopted for healthcare provider training with recommendations for retraining every two years or longer. This systematic review studies the retention of adult ALS knowledge and skills following completion of an ALS course in healthcare providers. We retrieved original articles using Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and PubMed, and reviewed reference citations to identify additional studies. We extracted data from included articles using a structured approach and organized outcomes by evaluation method, and knowledge and skills retention. Among 336 articles retrieved, 11 papers were included. Most studies used multiple-choice questionnaires to evaluate knowledge retention and cardiac arrest simulation or other skills tests to evaluate skills retention. All studies reported variable rates of knowledge or skills deterioration over time, from 6 weeks to 2 years after training. Two studies noted retention of knowledge at 18 months and up to 2 years, and one reported skills retention at 3 months. Clinical experience, either prior to or after the courses, has a positive impact on retention of knowledge and skills. There is a lack of large well-designed studies examining the retention of adult ALS knowledge and skills in healthcare providers. The available evidence suggests that ALS knowledge and skills decay by 6 months to 1 year after training and that skills decay faster than knowledge. Additional studies are needed to help provide evidence-based recommendations for assessment of current knowledge and skills and need for refresher training to maximize maintenance of ALS competency. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Human Development Report

              (2009)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0372434
                728
                Arch Dis Child
                Arch. Dis. Child.
                Archives of disease in childhood
                0003-9888
                1468-2044
                9 July 2014
                11 June 2014
                November 2014
                01 November 2014
                : 99
                : 11
                : 993-997
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Paediatrics, University Teaching Hospital of Kigali (CHUK), Kigali, Rwanda
                [2 ]School of Medicine, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
                [3 ]Department of Paediatrics, Ambroise Pare University Hospital, Mons, Belgium
                [4 ]Department of Paediatrics, Hinchingbrooke Hospital, Hinchingbrooke, UK
                [5 ]KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
                [6 ]Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, UK
                [7 ]Department of Paediatrics, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Dr Tom Lissauer, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK; t.lissauer@ 123456imperial.ac.uk

                Contributors LT organised ETAT+ courses and student evaluation. PK helped design the evaluation and organised student attendance. SVS helped establish ETAT + course in Rwanda. MB collected and collated data. ME developed ETAT+ course and programme in Kenya, organises updating of guidelines. TL is the project lead for introduction of ETAT+ courses into Rwanda, drafted the paper. LT, PK, SVS, MB and ME contributed to the paper.

                Article
                EMS59586
                10.1136/archdischild-2014-306078
                4198299
                24925893
                15e23e4e-2b3f-48b2-9e3b-31fa464e431d
                Copyright Article author (or their employer) 2014.

                Open Access This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article