0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Spatio-temporal variations of ecosystem services in the urban agglomerations in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, China

      , , , , ,
      Ecological Indicators
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation

              Although a number of comprehensive reviews have examined global ecosystem services (ES), few have focused on studies that assess urban ecosystem services (UES). Given that more than half of the world’s population lives in cities, understanding the dualism of the provision of and need for UES is of critical importance. Which UES are the focus of research, and what types of urban land use are examined? Are models or decision support systems used to assess the provision of UES? Are trade-offs considered? Do studies of UES engage stakeholders? To address these questions, we analyzed 217 papers derived from an ISI Web of Knowledge search using a set of standardized criteria. The results indicate that most UES studies have been undertaken in Europe, North America, and China, at city scale. Assessment methods involve bio-physical models, Geographical Information Systems, and valuation, but few study findings have been implemented as land use policy. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Ecological Indicators
                Ecological Indicators
                Elsevier BV
                1470160X
                August 2020
                August 2020
                : 115
                : 106394
                Article
                10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106394
                16486fe8-3a61-435d-a09b-733307b23d07
                © 2020

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                https://www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-017

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-037

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-012

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-029

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-004

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article