39
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      How the Cobra Got Its Flesh-Eating Venom: Cytotoxicity as a Defensive Innovation and Its Co-Evolution with Hooding, Aposematic Marking, and Spitting

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The cytotoxicity of the venom of 25 species of Old World elapid snake was tested and compared with the morphological and behavioural adaptations of hooding and spitting. We determined that, contrary to previous assumptions, the venoms of spitting species are not consistently more cytotoxic than those of closely related non-spitting species. While this correlation between spitting and non-spitting was found among African cobras, it was not present among Asian cobras. On the other hand, a consistent positive correlation was observed between cytotoxicity and utilisation of the defensive hooding display that cobras are famous for. Hooding and spitting are widely regarded as defensive adaptations, but it has hitherto been uncertain whether cytotoxicity serves a defensive purpose or is somehow useful in prey subjugation. The results of this study suggest that cytotoxicity evolved primarily as a defensive innovation and that it has co-evolved twice alongside hooding behavior: once in the Hemachatus + Naja and again independently in the king cobras ( Ophiophagus). There was a significant increase of cytotoxicity in the Asian Naja linked to the evolution of bold aposematic hood markings, reinforcing the link between hooding and the evolution of defensive cytotoxic venoms. In parallel, lineages with increased cytotoxicity but lacking bold hood patterns evolved aposematic markers in the form of high contrast body banding. The results also indicate that, secondary to the evolution of venom rich in cytotoxins, spitting has evolved three times independently: once within the African Naja, once within the Asian Naja, and once in the Hemachatus genus. The evolution of cytotoxic venom thus appears to facilitate the evolution of defensive spitting behaviour. In contrast, a secondary loss of cytotoxicity and reduction of the hood occurred in the water cobra Naja annulata, which possesses streamlined neurotoxic venom similar to that of other aquatic elapid snakes (e.g., hydrophiine sea snakes). The results of this study make an important contribution to our growing understanding of the selection pressures shaping the evolution of snake venom and its constituent toxins. The data also aid in elucidating the relationship between these selection pressures and the medical impact of human snakebite in the developing world, as cytotoxic cobras cause considerable morbidity including loss-of-function injuries that result in economic and social burdens in the tropics of Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile.

          The primary rationale for the use of phylogenetically based statistical methods is that phylogenetic signal, the tendency for related species to resemble each other, is ubiquitous. Whether this assertion is true for a given trait in a given lineage is an empirical question, but general tools for detecting and quantifying phylogenetic signal are inadequately developed. We present new methods for continuous-valued characters that can be implemented with either phylogenetically independent contrasts or generalized least-squares models. First, a simple randomization procedure allows one to test the null hypothesis of no pattern of similarity among relatives. The test demonstrates correct Type I error rate at a nominal alpha = 0.05 and good power (0.8) for simulated datasets with 20 or more species. Second, we derive a descriptive statistic, K, which allows valid comparisons of the amount of phylogenetic signal across traits and trees. Third, we provide two biologically motivated branch-length transformations, one based on the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) model of stabilizing selection, the other based on a new model in which character evolution can accelerate or decelerate (ACDC) in rate (e.g., as may occur during or after an adaptive radiation). Maximum likelihood estimation of the OU (d) and ACDC (g) parameters can serve as tests for phylogenetic signal because an estimate of d or g near zero implies that a phylogeny with little hierarchical structure (a star) offers a good fit to the data. Transformations that improve the fit of a tree to comparative data will increase power to detect phylogenetic signal and may also be preferable for further comparative analyses, such as of correlated character evolution. Application of the methods to data from the literature revealed that, for trees with 20 or more species, 92% of traits exhibited significant phylogenetic signal (randomization test), including behavioral and ecological ones that are thought to be relatively evolutionarily malleable (e.g., highly adaptive) and/or subject to relatively strong environmental (nongenetic) effects or high levels of measurement error. Irrespective of sample size, most traits (but not body size, on average) showed less signal than expected given the topology, branch lengths, and a Brownian motion model of evolution (i.e., K was less than one), which may be attributed to adaptation and/or measurement error in the broad sense (including errors in estimates of phenotypes, branch lengths, and topology). Analysis of variance of log K for all 121 traits (from 35 trees) indicated that behavioral traits exhibit lower signal than body size, morphological, life-history, or physiological traits. In addition, physiological traits (corrected for body size) showed less signal than did body size itself. For trees with 20 or more species, the estimated OU (25% of traits) and/or ACDC (40%) transformation parameter differed significantly from both zero and unity, indicating that a hierarchical tree with less (or occasionally more) structure than the original better fit the data and so could be preferred for comparative analyses.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Complex cocktails: the evolutionary novelty of venoms.

            Venoms have evolved on numerous occasions throughout the animal kingdom. These 'biochemical weapon systems' typically function to facilitate, or protect the producing animal from, predation. Most venomous animals remain unstudied despite venoms providing model systems for investigating predator-prey interactions, molecular evolution, functional convergence, and novel targets for pharmaceutical discovery. Through advances in 'omic' technologies, venom composition data have recently become available for several venomous lineages, revealing considerable complexity in the processes responsible for generating the genetic and functional diversity observed in many venoms. Here, we review these recent advances and highlight the ecological and evolutionary novelty of venom systems. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A new method of inference of ancestral nucleotide and amino acid sequences.

              A statistical method was developed for reconstructing the nucleotide or amino acid sequences of extinct ancestors, given the phylogeny and sequences of the extant species. A model of nucleotide or amino acid substitution was employed to analyze data of the present-day sequences, and maximum likelihood estimates of parameters such as branch lengths were used to compare the posterior probabilities of assignments of character states (nucleotides or amino acids) to interior nodes of the tree; the assignment having the highest probability was the best reconstruction at the site. The lysozyme c sequences of six mammals were analyzed by using the likelihood and parsimony methods. The new likelihood-based method was found to be superior to the parsimony method. The probability that the amino acids for all interior nodes at a site reconstructed by the new method are correct was calculated to be 0.91, 0.86, and 0.73 for all, variable, and parsimony-informative sites, respectively, whereas the corresponding probabilities for the parsimony method were 0.84, 0.76, and 0.51, respectively. The probability that an amino acid in an ancestral sequence is correctly reconstructed by the likelihood analysis ranged from 91.3 to 98.7% for the four ancestral sequences.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Toxins (Basel)
                Toxins (Basel)
                toxins
                Toxins
                MDPI
                2072-6651
                13 March 2017
                March 2017
                : 9
                : 3
                : 103
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Venom Evolution Lab, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; nadya.panagides@ 123456gmail.com (N.P.); tnwjackson@ 123456gmail.com (T.N.W.J.); rp1990@ 123456gmx.at (R.P.); dr.syedabidali@ 123456gmail.com (S.A.A.); jcoludar@ 123456gmail.com (I.K.); james.dobson@ 123456uqconnect.edu.au (J.D.); brittany.sanker@ 123456uq.net.au (B.S.); angelique.asselin@ 123456uq.net.au (A.A.); renancassant@ 123456gmail.com (R.C.S.); iwanhx@ 123456yahoo.com (I.H.)
                [2 ]QIMR Berghofer Institute of Medical Research, Herston, QLD 4049, Australia; maria.ikonomopoulou@ 123456qimrberghofer.edu.au (M.P.I.); John.Miles@ 123456qimrberghofer.edu.au (J.M.)
                [3 ]School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4002, Australia
                [4 ]Department of Biosciences, College of Science, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK; kevin.arbuckle@ 123456swansea.ac.uk
                [5 ]Monash Venom Group, Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia; daryl.yang@ 123456monash.edu (D.C.Y.); wayne.hodgson@ 123456monash.edu (W.C.H.)
                [6 ]HEJ Research Institute of Chemistry, International Centre for Chemical and Biological Sciences (ICCBS), University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Pakistan
                [7 ]Working Group Adder Research Netherlands, RAVON, 6525 ED Nijmegen, The Netherlands; info@ 123456eyecreations.nl
                [8 ]Working Group Venomous Bites Netherlands, RAVON, 6525 ED Nijmegen, The Netherlands; jeremie@ 123456ratelslangen.nl
                [9 ]Naturalis Biodiversity Center, 2333 CR Leiden, The Netherlands; rovdbergh@ 123456me.com (R.v.d.B.); freek.vonk@ 123456naturalis.nl (F.J.V.)
                [10 ]Institute of Biology Leiden (IBL), Leiden University, Sylviusweg 72, 2333 BE Leiden, The Netherlands; h.m.i.kerkkamp@ 123456biology.leidenuniv.nl
                [11 ]Snakebite Assist, Pretoria ZA-0001, South Africa; afnaude@ 123456worldonline.co.za
                [12 ]Department Pharmacology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria ZA-0001, South Africa; morne.strydom@ 123456synexus.com
                [13 ]SYNEXUS Clinical Research SA Pty Ltd., Pretoria ZA-0001, South Africa
                [14 ]Zoology Department, University of Pretoria, Pretoria ZA-0001, South Africa; louissnakes@ 123456gmail.com
                [15 ]Venom Supplies, Tanunda, South Australia 5352, Australia; nathan@ 123456venomsupplies.com
                [16 ]Planet Exotica, 5 Avenue des Fleurs de la Paix, 17204 Royan, France; marc.jaeger@ 123456bluewin.ch
                [17 ]Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD 4878, Australia
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: bgfry@ 123456uq.edu.au
                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                [‡]

                Joint-senior authors on this work.

                Article
                toxins-09-00103
                10.3390/toxins9030103
                5371858
                28335411
                164a89f5-d9fc-453d-b09e-093733c981e6
                © 2017 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 23 January 2017
                : 05 March 2017
                Categories
                Article

                Molecular medicine
                cytotoxin,cobra,hemachatus,naja,ophiophagus,elapidae,evolution,antipredator defense
                Molecular medicine
                cytotoxin, cobra, hemachatus, naja, ophiophagus, elapidae, evolution, antipredator defense

                Comments

                Comment on this article