15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Validation of a Calibrated Prediction Model for Response to Growth Hormone Treatment in an Independent Cohort

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Prediction models, e.g. for prediction of response to growth hormone treatment, need validation in appropriate independent cohorts, comparing predicted and observed outcomes. In a previous validation of a model for predicting the first-year response to growth hormone treatment in children with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency, overfitting was observed. We modified the prediction formula and now report validation of this modified model. Patients and Methods: The modified and original prediction models were applied to a group of patients selected from Lilly’s GeNeSIS database using the same inclusion and exclusion criteria as for the original model. For both prediction methods, observed first-year height velocity was plotted vs. predicted height velocity in a calibration plot. For a valid prediction, the regression line should correspond to the line of identity (observed outcome is equal to predicted outcome); the regression lines for each prediction model were tested for significant differences from this line of identity. Results: The number of patients fulfilling the criteria was 226. The regression line in the calibration plot of the modified model was not significantly different from the line of identity (p = 0.43), in contrast to the original model (p < 0.001). For the modified model the mean (SD) prediction error was –0.11 (2.05) cm/year and for the original model 0.28 (2.11) cm/year. Conclusion: The modified prediction method, obtained after calibration of the original model, performs well in an independent patient sample and gives more accurate predictions than the original model.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Validated multivariate models predicting the growth response to GH treatment in individual short children with a broad range in GH secretion capacities.

          The aim of the study was to develop and validate models that could predict the growth responses to GH therapy of individual children. Models for prediction of the initial one and 2-y growth response were constructed from a cohort of 269 prepubertal children (Model group) with isolated GH deficiency or idiopathic short stature, using a nonlinear multivariate data fitting technique. Five sets of clinical information were used. The "Basic model" was created using auxological data from the year before the start of GH treatment and parental heights. In addition to Basic model data, the other four models included growth data from the first 2 y of life, or IGF-I, or GH secretion estimated during a provocation test (AITT) or a spontaneous GH secretion profile. The performance of the models was validated by calculating the differences between predicted and observed growth responses in 149 new GH treated children (Validation group) who fulfilled the inclusion criteria used in the original cohort. The SD of these differences (SD(res)) in the validation group was compared with the SD(res) for the model group. For the 1st y, the SD(res) for the Basic model was 0.28 SDscores. The lowest SD(res) (0.19 SDscores), giving the most narrow prediction interval, was achieved adding the 24h GH profile and data on growth from the first 2 y of life to the Basic model. The models presented permit estimation of GH responsiveness in children over a broad range in GH secretion, and with an accuracy of the models substantially better than when using maximal GH response during an provocation test. The predicted individual growth response, calculated using a computer program, can serve as a guide for evidence-based decisions when selecting children to GH treatment.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The mathematical model for total pubertal growth in idiopathic growth hormone (GH) deficiency suggests a moderate role of GH dose.

            The role of GH treatment during total pubertal growth (TPG) is still unclear. We developed a prediction model for TPG (centimeters) through a multiple regression analysis of various prepubertal parameters in 303 adolescents with idiopathic GH deficiency from the KIGS database. Prepubertal catch-up growth and near-adult height were achieved, and GH dose was kept constant at approximately 30 micro g/kg.d. The model was validated on a cohort of 36 patients from one center. Four TPG predictors explained 70% of the variability with an error SD of 4.2 cm: gender (TPG in males was >11.3 cm vs. that in females), age at onset of puberty (negative), height SD score minus midparental height SD score at puberty onset (negative), and mean GH dose during puberty (positive). Our analysis suggests that TPG in idiopathic GH deficiency is only moderately dependent on GH dose. The use of a higher GH dosage at the onset of puberty should thus depend on the individual's height development. The TPG model aids in the planning of individually optimized and cost-effective GH treatment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A new and accurate prediction model for growth response to growth hormone treatment in children with growth hormone deficiency

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                HRE
                Horm Res Paediatr
                10.1159/issn.1663-2818
                Hormone Research in Paediatrics
                S. Karger AG
                1663-2818
                1663-2826
                2006
                June 2006
                23 June 2006
                : 66
                : 1
                : 13-16
                Affiliations
                aDutch Growth Foundation, bDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and cDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Endocrinology, Sophia Children’s Hospital, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; dEli Lilly and Company, Bad Homburg, Germany
                Article
                93047 Horm Res 2006;66:13–16
                10.1159/000093047
                16675910
                1658d795-ab19-4d6c-ad87-22860a1e9cbf
                © 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 19 December 2005
                : 08 March 2006
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, References: 11, Pages: 4
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Endocrinology & Diabetes,Neurology,Nutrition & Dietetics,Sexual medicine,Internal medicine,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                Growth hormone deficiency and treatment,Growth response,Validation,Growth prediction,Prediction models

                Comments

                Comment on this article