2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Treatment Pressures and the Predicament of Family Care: A Grounded Theory Study With Relatives of People With a Serious Mental Health Condition

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Relatives are increasingly recognized as important in the care of people with a serious mental health condition, such as major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia. Research indicates that in providing care, relatives use so-called treatment pressures, such as persuasion, interpersonal leverage, inducements, or threats, to promote the treatment compliance of their family member. This grounded theory study investigated why relatives use treatment pressures by analyzing the experiences of relatives of people with a serious mental health condition before, during, and after mental health crises of their family member. We conducted 11 semi-structured, problem-centered interviews with such relatives in Germany between October 2019 and January 2020. Our analysis showed that the key category of relatives’ experiences is a predicament characterized by feeling responsible to take action while experiencing a limited range of action. Relatives’ perceived responsibility to take action had three dimensions: relatives’ worries about their family member and other members of the family, societal norms and expectations, and the transfer of responsibility from the mental healthcare system to relatives. The limitation of relatives’ scope of action also had three dimensions: their family member’s opposition to treatment, legal criteria for involuntary commitment or treatment, and their dependency on mental healthcare professionals and the mental healthcare system. We reconstructed three different ways in which relatives may deal with this predicament: assuming responsibility for their family member’s treatment, which involved exerting treatment pressures, staying out of their family member’s mental health–related matters, and focusing on their own well-being.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Treatment pressures, leverage, coercion, and compulsion in mental health care

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Partnerships for better mental health worldwide: WPA recommendations on best practices in working with service users and family carers.

              WPA President M. Maj established the Task Force on Best Practice in Working with Service Users and Carers in 2008, chaired by H. Herrman. The Task Force had the remit to create recommendations for the international mental health community on how to develop successful partnership working. The work began with a review of literature on service user and carer involvement and partnership. This set out a range of considerations for good practice, including choice of appropriate terminology, clarifying the partnership process and identifying and reducing barriers to partnership working. Based on the literature review and on the shared knowledge in the Task Force, a set of ten recommendations for good practice was developed. These recommendations were the basis for a worldwide consultation of stakeholders with expertise as service users, families and carers, and the WPA Board and Council. The results showed a strong consensus across the international mental health community on the ten recommendations, with the strongest agreement coming from service users and carers. This general consensus gives a basis for Task Force plans to seek support for activities to promote shared work worldwide to identify best practice examples and create a resource to assist others to begin successful collaboration.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Qualitative Health Research
                Qual Health Res
                SAGE Publications
                1049-7323
                1552-7557
                December 12 2024
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, LWL University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
                [3 ]Institute for Ethics, History and Theories of Medicine, University Münster, Münster, Germany
                Article
                10.1177/10497323241300042
                166eb0dd-1477-423b-8cc2-751bf1cf2eb4
                © 2024

                https://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log