21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Flexibility in Language Action Interaction: The Influence of Movement Type

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Recent neuropsychological studies in neurological patients and healthy subjects suggest a close functional relationship between the brain systems for language and action. Facilitation and inhibition effects of motor system activity on language processing have been demonstrated as well as causal effects in the reverse direction, from language processes on motor excitability or performance. However, as the documented effects between motor and language systems were sometimes facilitatory and sometimes inhibitory, the “sign” of these effects still remains to be explained. In a previous study, we reported a word-category-specific differential impairment of verbal working memory for concordant arm- and leg-related action words brought about by complex sequential movements of the hands and feet. In this article, we seek to determine whether the sign of the functional interaction between language and action systems of the human brain can be changed in a predictable manner by changing movement type. We here report that the sign of the effect of motor movement on action word memory can be reversed from interference to facilitation if, instead of complex movement sequences, simple repetitive movements are performed. Specifically, when engaged in finger tapping, subjects were able to remember relatively more arm-related action words (as compared to control conditions), thus documenting an enhancement of working memory brought about by simple hand movements. In contrast, when performing complex sequences of finger movements, an effector-specific degradation of action word memory was found. By manipulating the sign of the effect in accord with theory-driven predictions, these findings provide support for shared neural bases for motor movement and verbal working memory for action-related words and strengthen the argument that motor systems play a causal and functionally relevant role in language processing semantically related to action.

          Related collections

          Most cited references68

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Active perception: sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language.

          Action and perception are functionally linked in the brain, but a hotly debated question is whether perception and comprehension of stimuli depend on motor circuits. Brain language mechanisms are ideal for addressing this question. Neuroimaging investigations have found specific motor activations when subjects understand speech sounds, word meanings and sentence structures. Moreover, studies involving transcranial magnetic stimulation and patients with lesions affecting inferior frontal regions of the brain have shown contributions of motor circuits to the comprehension of phonemes, semantic categories and grammar. These data show that language comprehension benefits from frontocentral action systems, indicating that action and perception circuits are interdependent.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Grounding language in action

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Coming of age: a review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics.

              Over the last decade, there has been an increasing body of work that explores whether sensory and motor information is a necessary part of semantic representation and processing. This is the embodiment hypothesis. This paper presents a theoretical review of this work that is intended to be useful for researchers in the neurosciences and neuropsychology. Beginning with a historical perspective, relevant theories are placed on a continuum from strongly embodied to completely unembodied representations. Predictions are derived and neuroscientific and neuropsychological evidence that could support different theories is reviewed; finally, criticisms of embodiment are discussed. We conclude that strongly embodied and completely disembodied theories are not supported, and that the remaining theories agree that semantic representation involves some form of convergence zones (Damasio, 1989) and the activation of modal content. For the future, research must carefully define the boundaries of semantic processing and tackle the representation of abstract entities. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Srl. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front. Hum. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5161
                25 June 2018
                2018
                : 12
                : 252
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge , Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [2] 2Linguistics Department, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, United Arab Emirates University , Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
                [3] 3Brain Language Laboratory, Department of Philosophy and Humanities, Freie Universität Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                [4] 4Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                [5] 5Einstein Center for Neurosciences , Berlin, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Klaus Gramann, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany

                Reviewed by: Anna M. Borghi, Sapienza Università di Roma, Italy; Gregory Kroliczak, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland

                Article
                10.3389/fnhum.2018.00252
                6026896
                29988612
                16894988-14a9-4b3c-8ac9-fb269a04560f
                Copyright © 2018 Shebani and Pulvermüller.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 23 March 2018
                : 30 May 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 85, Pages: 11, Words: 9891
                Funding
                Funded by: Medical Research Council 10.13039/501100000265
                Award ID: U1055.04.003.00001.01, MC_US_A060_0034
                Funded by: College of Humanities and Social Sciences, United Arab Emirates University 10.13039/501100007203
                Award ID: G00002203
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 10.13039/501100001659
                Award ID: Pu 97/22-1
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Original Research

                Neurosciences
                action word,working memory,motor movement,motor-language interaction,semantics
                Neurosciences
                action word, working memory, motor movement, motor-language interaction, semantics

                Comments

                Comment on this article