22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Minding the gap: identifying values to enable public and patient involvement at the pre-commencement stage of research projects

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The University College Dublin (UCD) Public and Patient Invovlement (PPI) ignite program is focused on embedding PPI in health and social care related research, education and training, professional practice and administration. During a PPI knowledge sharing event challenges were noted during the pre-commencement stage of research projects. This stage includes the time before a research projects/partnership starts or when funding is being applied for. As a response, we agreed there was a need to spend time developing a values-based approach to be used from the pre-commencement of PPI projects and partnerships. Values are deeply held ideals that people consider to be important. They are vital in shaping our attitudes and motivating our choices and behaviours.

          Methods

          Using independent facilitators, we invited a diverse group of participants to a full-day workshop in February. During the workshop, the concept of a values statement and values-based approaches was introduced. The group via a majority consensus, agreed on a core set of values and a shared understanding of them. After the workshop, a draft was shared with participants for further comment and final agreement.

          Results

          The workshop had 22 people representing experts by experience, PPI charity partners, funders, academics and national PPI Ignite partners. The group via consensus identified four values of respect, openness, reciprocity and flexibility for the pre-commencement stage. A frequently reported experience of PPI partners was that some felt that the pre-commencement activities appeared at times like a performance; an act that had to be completed in order to move to the next stage rather than a genuine interest in a mutually beneficial partnership. Being open and transparent with all invovled that the funding application may not be successful was stressed. Another important feature related to ‘openness’ was the ‘spaces’ and ‘places’ in which meetings between partners could occur in an accessible and equitable way. The issue of ‘space’ is particularly critical for the involvement of seldom heard groups. The benefits of the research are often clear for academics, but for PPI partners, these are often less certain. To achieve reciprocity, academic and PPI partners need to engage in a timely, repeated and transparent dialogue to achieve beneficial outcomes for all stakeholders. Being open to new inputs and differing modes of knowledge and ideas was also stressed. For some, this will require a change in attitudes and behaviours and should result in more collective decision making. Several areas were identified using the four values.

          Conclusions

          This work via majority consensus identified four values of respect, openness, reciprocity, and flexibility for the pre-commencement stage. These values should be used to support inclusive, effective and collective PPI across all stages of involvement. We hope this work will stimulate further action in this area. In particular, we would welcome the evaluation of these values involving diverse PPI groups.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research

          GRIPP2 (short form and long form) is the first international guidance for reporting of patient and public involvement in health and social care research. This paper describes the development of the GRIPP2 reporting checklists, which aim to improve the quality, transparency, and consistency of the international patient and public involvement (PPI) evidence base, to ensure that PPI practice is based on the best evidence
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co‐design pilot

            Abstract Background Numerous frameworks for supporting, evaluating and reporting patient and public involvement in research exist. The literature is diverse and theoretically heterogeneous. Objectives To identify and synthesize published frameworks, consider whether and how these have been used, and apply design principles to improve usability. Search strategy Keyword search of six databases; hand search of eight journals; ancestry and snowball search; requests to experts. Inclusion criteria Published, systematic approaches (frameworks) designed to support, evaluate or report on patient or public involvement in health‐related research. Data extraction and synthesis Data were extracted on provenance; collaborators and sponsors; theoretical basis; lay input; intended user(s) and use(s); topics covered; examples of use; critiques; and updates. We used the Canadian Centre for Excellence on Partnerships with Patients and Public (CEPPP) evaluation tool and hermeneutic methodology to grade and synthesize the frameworks. In five co‐design workshops, we tested evidence‐based resources based on the review findings. Results Our final data set consisted of 65 frameworks, most of which scored highly on the CEPPP tool. They had different provenances, intended purposes, strengths and limitations. We grouped them into five categories: power‐focused; priority‐setting; study‐focused; report‐focused; and partnership‐focused. Frameworks were used mainly by the groups who developed them. The empirical component of our study generated a structured format and evidence‐based facilitator notes for a “build your own framework” co‐design workshop. Conclusion The plethora of frameworks combined with evidence of limited transferability suggests that a single, off‐the‐shelf framework may be less useful than a menu of evidence‐based resources which stakeholders can use to co‐design their own frameworks.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                eidin.nishe@ucd.ie
                Journal
                Res Involv Engagem
                Res Involv Engagem
                Research Involvement and Engagement
                BioMed Central (London )
                2056-7529
                3 August 2020
                3 August 2020
                2020
                : 6
                : 46
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.7886.1, ISNI 0000 0001 0768 2743, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, , University College Dublin, ; Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
                [2 ]GRID grid.425295.d, Irish Research Council, ; Dublin, Ireland
                [3 ]GRID grid.7886.1, ISNI 0000 0001 0768 2743, UCD School of Social Policy, , Social Work and Social Justice, ; Dublin, Ireland
                [4 ]GRID grid.7886.1, ISNI 0000 0001 0768 2743, School of Medicine, , University College Dublin, ; Dublin, Ireland
                [5 ]GRID grid.496949.f, Family Carers Ireland, ; Dublin, Ireland
                [6 ]Expert by Experience, Dublin, Ireland
                [7 ]GRID grid.8217.c, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9705, PPI Ignite, , Trinity College Dublin, ; Dublin, Ireland
                [8 ]GRID grid.95004.38, ISNI 0000 0000 9331 9029, Design Innovation, , Maynooth University, ; Kildare, Ireland
                [9 ]Age and Opportunity, Dublin, Ireland
                [10 ]GRID grid.6142.1, ISNI 0000 0004 0488 0789, PPI Ignite, , National University of Ireland Galway, ; Dublin, Ireland
                [11 ]GRID grid.497012.9, Transgender Equality Network Ireland, ; Dublin, Ireland
                [12 ]GRID grid.15596.3e, ISNI 0000000102380260, DCU School of Nursing, Psychotherapy and Community Health, ; Dublin, Ireland
                [13 ]Irish Platform for Patient Organisations, Science and Industry, Dublin, Ireland
                [14 ]GRID grid.496983.9, The Alzheimer Society of Ireland, ; Dublin, Ireland
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1036-6044
                Article
                220
                10.1186/s40900-020-00220-7
                7396939
                31921443
                169ce859-f4e1-479f-acfb-cbd7ba459f98
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 23 April 2020
                : 13 July 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010414, Health Research Board;
                Award ID: HRB PPI Ignite Award [PPI-2017-004]
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                public and patient involvement,co-design,pre-commencement stage,values

                Comments

                Comment on this article