9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT WITH FRAX USING REAL-WORLD DATA: A POPULATION-BASED COHORT FROM ISRAEL.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The predictive value of the WHO fracture risk assessment tool was evaluated using real-world community data. A population-based cohort of 141,320 women aged 50-90 years old (median age 58, inter quartile range (IQR): 54-67) at the year 2004 was extracted from the central database of a large Israeli healthcare services provider and insurer. Retrospective FRAX scores were calculated using computerized health records and compared to actual incident major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) during the following 10 years. A total of 6.9% and 2.2% MOF and hip fractures were expected vs. 13.5% and 2.9% observed. The area under receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of FRAX without bone mineral density (BMD) was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.66) for MOF and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.82) for hip fracture. A total of 16,578 subjects had BMD data at index, and their risk estimates based solely on BMD exhibited lower predictive performance for MOF (AUC = 0.62 vs. 0.65, P value = 0.003) as well as hip fractures (AUC = 0.78 vs. 0.84, P value < 0.001) as compared with FRAX. FRAX using electronic health records provided reasonable discrimination despite some underestimation of the absolute risk of non-hip fractures. Integration with routine clinical systems could increase implementation in daily practice and improve risk detection, especially for patients without BMD.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Am. J. Epidemiol.
          American journal of epidemiology
          Oxford University Press (OUP)
          1476-6256
          0002-9262
          May 18 2017
          Article
          3831236
          10.1093/aje/kwx128
          28520844
          16a5d1d5-66d8-4573-a116-e0e308017f49
          History

          FRAX,Osteoporosis,fracture risk,performance
          FRAX, Osteoporosis, fracture risk, performance

          Comments

          Comment on this article