4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Frequencies and clinical associations of myositis-related antibodies in The Netherlands: A one-year survey of all Dutch patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a heterogeneous group of connective tissue diseases, collectively known as myositis. Diagnosis of IIM is challenging while timely recognition of an IIM is of utter importance considering treatment options and otherwise irreversible (severe) long-term clinical complications. With the EULAR/ACR classification criteria (2017) considerable advancement has been made in the diagnostic workup of IIM. While these criteria take into account clinical parameters as well as presence of one autoantibody, anti-Jo-1, several autoantibodies are associated with IIM and are currently evaluated to be incorporated into classification criteria. As individual antibodies occur at low frequency, the development of line blots allowing multiplex antibody analysis has improved laboratory diagnostics for IIM. The Euroline myositis line-blot assay (Euroimmun) allows screening and semi-quantitative measurement for 15 autoantibodies, i.e. myositis specific antibodies (MSA) to SRP, EJ, OJ, Mi-2α, Mi-2β, TIF1-γ, MDA5, NXP2, SAE1, PL-12, PL-7, Jo-1 and myositis associated antibodies (MAA) to Ku, PM/Scl-75 and PM/Scl-100. To evaluate the clinical significance of detection and levels of these autoantibodies in the Netherlands, a retrospective analysis of all Dutch requests for extended myositis screening within a 1 year period was performed. A total of 187 IIM patients and 632 non-IIM patients were included. We conclude that frequencies of MSA and MAA observed in IIM patients in a routine diagnostic setting are comparable to cohort-based studies. Weak positive antibody levels show less diagnostic accuracy compared to positive antibody levels, except for anti-NXP2. Known associations between antibodies and skin involvement (anti-MDA5, anti-TIF1-γ), lung involvement (anti-Jo-1), and malignancy (anti-TIF1-γ) were confirmed in our IIM study population. The availability of multiplex antibody analyses will facilitate inclusion of additional autoantibodies in clinical myositis guidelines and help to accelerate diagnosing IMM with rare but specific antibodies.

          Highlights

          • Similar frequency of MAA and MSA in diagnostic setting compared to cohort studies.

          • Positive levels of MSA/MAA show better diagnostic accuracy compared to weak positive levels.

          • Anti-NXP2 differentiates already at weak positive level between IIM and non-IIM patients.

          • Anti-TIF1-γ is associated with malignancy and anti-MDA5 and TIF1-γ with skin disease.

          • Anti-Jo-1 is associated with lung disease.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Classification of myositis

          The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs; also known as myositis) are a heterogeneous group of disorders in which a common feature is chronic inflammation of skeletal muscle, leading to muscle weakness. Other organs are frequently affected in IIMs, such as the skin, joints, lungs, gastrointestinal tract and heart, contributing to morbidity and mortality. Currently, IIMs are most often subclassified into polymyositis, dermatomyositis and inclusion body myositis, but this subclassification has limitations as these subgroups often have overlapping clinical and histopathological features, and outcomes vary within the subgroups; additionally, subgroups without considerable myopathy are not included. A new way of subgrouping patients could be on the basis of the presence of myositis-specific autoantibodies. These autoantibodies are associated with distinct clinical features and, moreover, can help to identify subsets of IIMs in which extramuscular symptoms, such as skin manifestations, arthritis or interstitial lung disease, might be the presenting or predominant feature when muscle symptoms are mild or absent. The recognition that subphenotypes with single-organ involvement other than muscles exist is important for identifying patients with early disease, for clinical care demanding team management and in designing clinical studies to improve our understanding of this heterogeneous disease to develop new therapies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Frequency, mutual exclusivity and clinical associations of myositis autoantibodies in a combined European cohort of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy patients

            Objectives To determine prevalence and co-existence of myositis specific autoantibodies (MSAs) and myositis associated autoantibodies (MAAs) and associated clinical characteristics in a large cohort of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) patients. Methods Adult patients with confirmed IIM recruited to the EuroMyositis registry (n = 1637) from four centres were investigated for the presence of MSAs/MAAs by radiolabelled-immunoprecipitation, with confirmation of anti-MDA5 and anti-NXP2 by ELISA. Clinical associations for each autoantibody were calculated for 1483 patients with a single or no known autoantibody by global linear regression modelling. Results MSAs/MAAs were found in 61.5% of patients, with 84.7% of autoantibody positive patients having a sole specificity, and only three cases (0.2%) having more than one MSA. The most frequently detected autoantibody was anti-Jo-1 (18.7%), with a further 21 specificities each found in 0.2–7.9% of patients. Autoantibodies to Mi-2, SAE, TIF1, NXP2, MDA5, PMScl and the non-Jo-1 tRNA-synthetases were strongly associated (p < 0.001) with cutaneous involvement. Anti-TIF1 and anti-Mi-2 positive patients had an increased risk of malignancy (OR 4.67 and 2.50 respectively), and anti-SRP patients had a greater likelihood of cardiac involvement (OR 4.15). Interstitial lung disease was strongly associated with the anti-tRNA synthetases, anti-MDA5, and anti-U1RNP/Sm. Overlap disease was strongly associated with anti-PMScl, anti-Ku, anti-U1RNP/Sm and anti-Ro60. Absence of MSA/MAA was negatively associated with extra-muscular manifestations. Conclusions Myositis autoantibodies are present in the majority of patients with IIM and identify distinct clinical subsets. Furthermore, MSAs are nearly always mutually exclusive endorsing their credentials as valuable disease biomarkers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The EuroMyositis registry: an international collaborative tool to facilitate myositis research

              Aims The EuroMyositis Registry facilitates collaboration across the idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) research community. This inaugural report examines pooled Registry data. Methods Cross-sectional analysis of IIM cases from 11 countries was performed. Associations between clinical subtypes, extramuscular involvement, environmental exposures and medications were investigated. Results Of 3067 IIM cases, 69% were female. The most common IIM subtype was dermatomyositis (DM) (31%). Smoking was more frequent in connective tissue disease overlap cases (45%, OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.90, p=0.012). Smoking was associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD) (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.65, p=0.013), dysphagia (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.77, p=0.001), malignancy ever (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.33, p<0.001) and cardiac involvement (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.60 to 3.60, p<0.001). Dysphagia occurred in 39% and cardiac involvement in 9%; either occurrence was associated with higher Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores (adjusted OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.23, p<0.001). HAQ scores were also higher in inclusion body myositis cases (adjusted OR 3.85, 95% CI 2.52 to 5.90, p<0.001). Malignancy (ever) occurred in 13%, most commonly in DM (20%, OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.65 to 2.57, p<0.001). ILD occurred in 30%, most frequently in antisynthetase syndrome (71%, OR 10.7, 95% CI 8.6 to 13.4, p<0.001). Rash characteristics differed between adult-onset and juvenile-onset DM cases (‘V’ sign: 56% DM vs 16% juvenile-DM, OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.36, p<0.001). Glucocorticoids were used in 98% of cases, methotrexate in 71% and azathioprine in 51%. Conclusion This large multicentre cohort demonstrates the importance of extramuscular involvement in patients with IIM, its association with smoking and its influence on disease severity. Our findings emphasise that IIM is a multisystem inflammatory disease and will help inform prognosis and clinical management of patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Transl Autoimmun
                J Transl Autoimmun
                Journal of Translational Autoimmunity
                Elsevier
                2589-9090
                23 August 2019
                December 2019
                23 August 2019
                : 2
                : 100013
                Affiliations
                [a ]St. Antonius Hospital, Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
                [b ]Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                [c ]Atalmedial, Medical Diagnostic Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                [d ]Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam Infection & Immunity Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                [e ]Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                [f ]Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden, the Netherlands
                [g ]Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                [h ]Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Clinical Laboratory, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
                [i ]Maastricht University Medical Center, Central Diagnostic Laboratory, Maastricht, the Netherlands
                [j ]Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Tilburg, the Netherlands
                [k ]LabWest, Den Haag, the Netherlands
                [l ]University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
                [m ]Rijnstate Hospital, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Arnhem, the Netherlands
                [n ]Medlon, Medical Diagnostics, Enschede, the Netherlands
                [o ]Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
                [p ]University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Groningen, the Netherlands
                [q ]St Antonius Hospital, Interstitial Lung Diseases Center of Excellence, Department of Pulmonology, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
                [r ]Division of Heart&Lungs, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
                [s ]Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Department of Immunology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. D.Wenzlau@ 123456umcutrecht.nl
                [1]

                Current address: University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of LTI Diagnostics, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

                [2]

                Current address: Haga Hospital, Department of Neurology, The Hague, The Netherlands.

                Article
                S2589-9090(19)30013-9 100013
                10.1016/j.jtauto.2019.100013
                7388388
                32743501
                16edb2d8-0a84-4feb-acf5-7ff6944b10dd
                © 2019 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 31 May 2019
                : 25 July 2019
                : 29 July 2019
                Categories
                Research paper

                idiopathic inflammatory myopathies,myositis,diagnostic parameters,multiplex assay,validation

                Comments

                Comment on this article