24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Range-constrained co-occurrence simulation reveals little niche partitioning among rock-dwelling Montenegrina land snails (Gastropoda: Clausiliidae)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aim

          Taxon co-occurrence analysis is commonly used in ecology, but it has not been applied to range-wide distribution data of partly allopatric taxa because existing methods cannot differentiate between distribution-related effects and taxon interactions. Our first aim was to develop a taxon co-occurrence analysis method that is also capable of taking into account the effect of species ranges and can handle faunistic records from museum databases or biodiversity inventories. Our second aim was to test the independence of taxon co-occurrences of rock-dwelling gastropods at different taxonomic levels, with a special focus on the Clausiliidae subfamily Alopiinae, and in particular the genus Montenegrina.

          Location

          Balkan Peninsula in south-eastern Europe (46N–36N, 13.5E–28E).

          Methods

          We introduced a taxon-specific metric that characterizes the occurrence probability at a given location. This probability was calculated as a distance-weighted mean of the taxon’s presence and absence records at all sites. We applied corrections to account for the biases introduced by varying sampling intensity in our dataset. Then we used probabilistic null-models to simulate taxon distributions under the null hypothesis of no taxon interactions and calculated pairwise and cumulated co-occurrences. Independence of taxon occurrences was tested by comparing observed co-occurrences to simulated values.

          Results

          We observed significantly fewer co-occurrences among species and intra-generic lineages of Montenegrina than expected under the assumption of no taxon interaction.

          Main conclusions

          Fewer than expected co-occurrences among species and intrageneric clades indicate that species divergence preceded niche partitioning. This suggests a primary role of non-adaptive processes in the speciation of rock-dwelling gastropods. The method can account for the effects of distributional constraints in range-wide datasets, making it suitable for testing ecological, biogeographical, or evolutionary hypotheses where interactions of partly allopatric taxa are in question.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species.

          Ecologists are increasingly adopting an evolutionary perspective, and in recent years, the idea that closely related species are ecologically similar has become widespread. In this regard, phylogenetic signal must be distinguished from phylogenetic niche conservatism. Phylogenetic niche conservatism results when closely related species are more ecologically similar that would be expected based on their phylogenetic relationships; its occurrence suggests that some process is constraining divergence among closely related species. In contrast, phylogenetic signal refers to the situation in which ecological similarity between species is related to phylogenetic relatedness; this is the expected outcome of Brownian motion divergence and thus is necessary, but not sufficient, evidence for the existence of phylogenetic niche conservatism. Although many workers consider phylogenetic niche conservatism to be common, a review of case studies indicates that ecological and phylogenetic similarities often are not related. Consequently, ecologists should not assume that phylogenetic niche conservatism exists, but rather should empirically examine the extent to which it occurs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            NULL MODEL ANALYSIS OF SPECIES CO-OCCURRENCE PATTERNS

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Theory and speciation.

              The study of speciation has become one of the most active areas of evolutionary biology, and substantial progress has been made in documenting and understanding phenomena ranging from sympatric speciation and reinforcement to the evolutionary genetics of postzygotic isolation. This progress has been driven largely by empirical results, and most useful theoretical work has concentrated on making sense of empirical patterns. Given the complexity of speciation, mathematical theory is subordinate to verbal theory and generalizations about data. Nevertheless, mathematical theory can provide a useful classification of verbal theories; can help determine the biological plausibility of verbal theories; can determine whether alternative mechanisms of speciation are consistent with empirical patterns; and can occasionally provide predictions that go beyond empirical generalizations. We discuss recent examples of progress in each of these areas.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0432556
                21539
                J Biogeogr
                J. Biogeogr.
                Journal of biogeography
                0305-0270
                1365-2699
                1 May 2018
                16 April 2018
                June 2018
                02 July 2018
                : 45
                : 6
                : 1444-1457
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Central Research Laboratories, Natural History Museum Vienna, Vienna, Austria
                [2 ]3rd Zoology Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Vienna, Austria
                [3 ]Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Hungary
                [4 ]Department of Integrative Zoology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
                [5 ]Institute of Plant Biology, Biological Research Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, Hungary
                [6 ]Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
                [7 ]Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Zoltán Fehér, Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Hungary. feher.zoltan@ 123456nhmus.hu

                Editor: Richard Ree

                Article
                EMS77431
                10.1111/jbi.13220
                6027963
                29973747
                16f39c70-a08b-4c6a-b2df-d3ca7c2e0ab5

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Geography
                allopatric distribution,coexistence,competitive exclusion,distribution modelling,geographic range overlap,non-adaptive speciation,probabilistic null model

                Comments

                Comment on this article