13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Response to Growth Hormone Treatment in Isolated Growth Hormone Deficiency versus Multiple Pituitary Hormone Deficiency

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Growth hormone (GH) therapy successfully increases height prognosis in children with GH deficiency (GHD); however, adult height data are still limited. Aim: This study investigated near-adult height (NAH) in patients with idiopathic GHD (i.e. those with a GH peak <10 µg/l with no organic pathology) divided into two groups: isolated GHD and multiple pituitary hormone deficiency (MPHD). Methods: All patients were registered in the Pfizer International Growth Study Database (KIGS). Median (10th to 90th percentile) values are given and measurements were expressed as standard deviation scores (SDS). Parental-adjusted height was determined. Results: GH therapy was started at a median age of 9.2 (range 4.9–12) years in patients with isolated GHD (n = 1,619, 60% males) and at 7.7 (range 2.8–12.2) years in those with MPHD (n = 554, 65% males; p < 0.001) at a median dose of 0.20 mg/kg/week. Height SDS at onset of therapy was –3.1 (range –4.5 to –2.1) and –3.8 (range –5.7 to –2.3), respectively (p < 0.001). The maximum GH peak and insulin-like growth factor I SDS were significantly (p < 0.05) lower in patients with MPHD than in those with isolated GHD. Both groups showed a significant (p < 0.05) increase in height SDS at 1 year that continued until the onset of puberty. Parental-adjusted height at the start of puberty was –0.1 (range –1.6 to 1.1) in patients with isolated GHD and –0.4 (range –1.9 to 1.2) in those with MPHD. Parental-adjusted NAH SDS in patients with isolated GHD was 0.0 (range –1.5 to 1.2) and slightly, but significantly, higher than NAH (–0.3, range –2.1 to 1.2; p < 0.001) in patients with MPHD. In patients with isolated GHD, total change in height SDS while receiving GH therapy was 1.6 (range 0.5–3.2), and the change in height SDS at puberty was 0.1 (range –0.7 to 1). The respective values were 2.6 (range 0.9–4.6) and 0.2 (range –1 to 1.3) in patients with MPHD. Parental-adjusted NAH was slightly lower in girls than in boys with isolated GHD, but no gender difference was observed in patients with MPHD. Multivariate analysis in patients with GHD and MPHD showed that higher birth weight, taller parents, greater height at onset, first-year responsiveness, and predicted height velocity were the most important predictors of NAH. Conclusions: 89% of patients with isolated GHD and 81% of those with MPHD reached an NAH within their genetic potential while receiving GH therapy. Most of the height gain occurred during prepubertal years.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Adult height after long term treatment with recombinant growth hormone for idiopathic isolated growth hormone deficiency: observational follow up study of the French population based registry.

          To evaluate the efficacy of recombinant growth hormone for increasing adult height in children treated for idiopathic isolated growth hormone deficiency. Observational follow up study. Population based registry. All 2852 French children diagnosed as having isolated idiopathic growth hormone deficiency whose treatment started between 1987 and 1992 and ended before 1996. Change in height between the start of treatment and adulthood; classification of patients according to whether treatment was completed as scheduled or stopped early. Adult height was obtained for 2165 (76%) patients. The mean dose of growth hormone at start of treatment was 0.42 IU/kg/week. Height gain was 1.1 (SD 0.9) standard deviation (SD) scores, resulting in an adult height of -1.6 (0.9) SD score (girls, 154 (5) cm; boys, 167 (6) cm). Patients who completed the treatment gained 1.0 (0.7) SD score of height in 3.6 (1.4) years. Patients with treatments stopped early gained 0.6 (0.6) SD score in 2.7 (1.4) years while receiving treatment and a further 0.4 (0.9) SD score after the end of treatment. Most of the variation in height gain was explained by regression towards the mean, patients' characteristics, and delay in starting puberty. Severe growth hormone deficiency was associated with better outcome. Each year of treatment was associated with a gain of 0.2 SD score(1.3 cm). The effect of growth hormone is unclear in many patients treated for so called idiopathic isolated growth hormone deficiency. Most of the patients have pubertal delay and a spontaneous growth potential, which must be taken into account when measuring the effect and cost effectiveness of treatments. Growth hormone deficiency should be clearly distinguished from pubertal delay, and criteria should restrict the definition to patients with severely and permanently altered growth hormone secretion as our results support the use of growth hormone in such patients. Long term trials are required for most patients currently treated.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Predicting growth in response to growth hormone treatment.

            The use of growth hormone (GH) to treat children who have disturbances of growth is complicated by variability both within and across diagnostic groups, and at the start of and throughout treatment. Growth prediction models are important tools in the effort to account for these sources of variability and tailor GH treatment to each patient's needs. This review considers the methodological approach taken to the development of models from data in large databases such as the Pfizer International Growth Database (KIGS); it also assesses the limitations of these models and their data sources, and the potential for improvements. While all aspects of model development bear continued scrutiny and improvement, the incorporation of more predictors is key if treatment outcomes are to be optimized in terms of efficacy, safety and cost.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prediction of adult height in growth-hormone-treated children with growth hormone deficiency.

              Several studies have searched for factors that significantly influence adult height (AH) of children with GH deficiency (GHD) who have been treated with biosynthetic GH, but a prediction model for AH has not yet been presented. Our objective was to develop models for prediction of AH, using information available at the start of GH treatment or after 1 yr of treatment. For this retrospective study, data were collected from the National Registry of Growth Hormone Treatment in Children, which contained data of Dutch children treated with GH. Patients included males born before 1985 and females born before 1987 with either diagnosis of GHD (syndromes, tumors, and other diseases were excluded) or a maximal GH response during provocation tests of less than 11 ng/ml, treated with biosynthetic GH for at least 1 yr. To be able to use the complete group of 342 children for the development of the models, multiple imputation was used for missing values. We assessed AH sd scores (SDS). Each prediction model contained both target height SDS and current height SDS. The change in height SDS during the first year proved an important predictor for AH. In all models, addition of GH dose was not significant. The percent explained variance, after correction for overfitting, ranged from 37% (prepubertal children, prediction at start) to 60% (pubertal children, prediction after 1 yr). The presented prediction models give accurate predictions of AH for children with GHD at start and after 1 yr of GH treatment. They are useful tools in the treatment of these children.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                HRP
                Horm Res Paediatr
                10.1159/issn.1663-2818
                Hormone Research in Paediatrics
                S. Karger AG
                978-3-8055-9654-1
                978-3-8055-9655-8
                1663-2818
                1663-2826
                2011
                July 2011
                21 July 2011
                : 76
                : Suppl 1
                : 42-46
                Affiliations
                aPediatric Endocrinology Unit, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey; bPfizer Health, Stockholm, Sweden; cPfizer Health, New York, N.Y., USA
                Author notes
                *F. Darendeliler, MD, Pediatric Endocrinology Unit, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, TR–34390 Istanbul Cappa (Turkey), Tel. +90 212 414 2508, E-Mail feyzad@istanbul.edu.tr
                Article
                329161 Horm Res Paediatr 2011;76(suppl 1):42–46
                10.1159/000329161
                21778748
                1755acac-78ae-4992-838b-8bcc08352425
                © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Pages: 5
                Categories
                KIGS Highlight Session

                Endocrinology & Diabetes,Neurology,Nutrition & Dietetics,Sexual medicine,Internal medicine,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                Near-adult height,Multiple pituitary hormone deficiency,Isolated growth hormone deficiency,Response to growth hormone

                Comments

                Comment on this article