+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Electrophysiological Effects of Propofol on the Normal Cardiac Conduction System

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          To determine the electrophysiological effects of propofol and to explain the potential mechanism(s) whereby it causes bradyarrhythmias, 10 closed-chest pigs weighing 20-25 kg were studied. Each animal was premedicated by intramuscular administration of ketamine hydrochloride, intubated, and mechanically ventilated. Femoral arterial and venous catheters were placed, and a comprehensive electrophysiologic evaluation was performed at baseline and after two doses (1 mg/kg i.v. bolus and 0.1 mg/kg/min infusion and an extra 1-mg/kg i.v. bolus and 0.2 mg/kg/min infusion) of propofol. The electrophysiological effects obtained on low- and high-dose propofol were compared to baseline values. Propofol caused a dose-related decrease in sinus cycle length (baseline 565 ± 36 ms, low-dose propofol 541 ± 28, high-dose propofol 527 ± 26 ms; p < 0.05), a prolongation of the corrected sinus node recovery time (baseline 119 ± 35 ms, low-dose propofol 126 ± 32, high-dose propofol 130 ± 30 ms; p < 0.01), and an increase in the His-ventricular interval (baseline 33 ± 4 ms, low-dose propofol 36 ± 4, high-dose propofol 40 ± 3 ms; p < 0.005). All other electrophysiological parameters remained unchanged, and there were no cases of spontaneous atrioventricular block or sinus pauses. We conclude that propofol causes dose-related depression of sinus node and His-Purkinje system functions, but has no effect on the atrioventricular node function and on the conduction properties of atrial and ventricular tissues in normal pig hearts.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          S. Karger AG
          19 November 2008
          : 87
          : 4
          : 319-324
          aSection of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, and bDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Mass., USA
          177113 Cardiology 1996;87:319–324
          © 1996 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 6
          Arrhythmias, Electrophysiology and Electrocardiography


          Comment on this article