6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Killer whale genomes reveal a complex history of recurrent admixture and vicariance

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 3 , 5 , 3 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 5 , 5 , 12 , 13 , 11 , 14 , 15 , 12 , 5 , 16 , 17 , 5 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 17 , 21 , 16 , 4 , 18 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 25 , 26 , 5
      Molecular Ecology
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Testing for ancient admixture between closely related populations.

          One enduring question in evolutionary biology is the extent of archaic admixture in the genomes of present-day populations. In this paper, we present a test for ancient admixture that exploits the asymmetry in the frequencies of the two nonconcordant gene trees in a three-population tree. This test was first applied to detect interbreeding between Neandertals and modern humans. We derive the analytic expectation of a test statistic, called the D statistic, which is sensitive to asymmetry under alternative demographic scenarios. We show that the D statistic is insensitive to some demographic assumptions such as ancestral population sizes and requires only the assumption that the ancestral populations were randomly mating. An important aspect of D statistics is that they can be used to detect archaic admixture even when no archaic sample is available. We explore the effect of sequencing error on the false-positive rate of the test for admixture, and we show how to estimate the proportion of archaic ancestry in the genomes of present-day populations. We also investigate a model of subdivision in ancestral populations that can result in D statistics that indicate recent admixture.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The genomic substrate for adaptive radiation in African cichlid fish

            Cichlid fishes are famous for large, diverse and replicated adaptive radiations in the Great Lakes of East Africa. To understand the molecular mechanisms underlying cichlid phenotypic diversity, we sequenced the genomes and transcriptomes of five lineages of African cichlids: the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), an ancestral lineage with low diversity; and four members of the East African lineage: Neolamprologus brichardi/pulcher (older radiation, Lake Tanganyika), Metriaclima zebra (recent radiation, Lake Malawi), Pundamilia nyererei (very recent radiation, Lake Victoria), and Astatotilapia burtoni (riverine species around Lake Tanganyika). We found an excess of gene duplications in the East African lineage compared to tilapia and other teleosts, an abundance of non-coding element divergence, accelerated coding sequence evolution, expression divergence associated with transposable element insertions, and regulation by novel microRNAs. In addition, we analysed sequence data from sixty individuals representing six closely related species from Lake Victoria, and show genome-wide diversifying selection on coding and regulatory variants, some of which were recruited from ancient polymorphisms. We conclude that a number of molecular mechanisms shaped East African cichlid genomes, and that amassing of standing variation during periods of relaxed purifying selection may have been important in facilitating subsequent evolutionary diversification.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Genetic Consequences of Range Expansions

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Molecular Ecology
                Mol Ecol
                Wiley
                0962-1083
                1365-294X
                May 27 2019
                May 27 2019
                Affiliations
                [1 ]CMPG, Institute of Ecology and Evolution University of Bern Bern Switzerland
                [2 ]NTNU University Museum Trondheim Norway
                [3 ]Department of Biology, Section for Evolutionary Genomics University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
                [4 ]Scottish Oceans Institute, East Sands University of St. Andrews St. Andrews UK
                [5 ]Marine Mammal and Turtle Division, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration Southwest Fisheries Science Center La Jolla California
                [6 ]Greenland Institute of Natural Resources Nuuk Greenland
                [7 ]American Museum of Natural History New York City New York
                [8 ]Faculdade de Ciências Universidade de Lisboa Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes Lisboa Portugal
                [9 ]Cascadia Research Olympia Washington
                [10 ]Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Marine Mammal Institute Oregon State University Newport Oregon
                [11 ]School of Biological Sciences University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand
                [12 ]Scottish Marine Animal Stranding Scheme SRUC Veterinary Services Drummondhill Inverness UK
                [13 ]Ocean Giants Program Wildlife Conservation Society New York City New York
                [14 ]Observatoire Pelagis Université de La Rochelle‐CNRS La Rochelle France
                [15 ]Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação da Megafauna Marinha, Instituto de Oceanografia Universidade Federal do Rio Grande Rio Grande Brazil
                [16 ]CIRCE Conservation, Information and Research on Cetaceans Algeciras Spain
                [17 ]Fisheries & Oceans Canada Winnipeg Manitoba Canada
                [18 ]Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC), CNRS‐ULR UMR Chizé France
                [19 ]National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Northwest Fisheries Science Center Seattle Washington
                [20 ]National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA Southeast Fisheries Science Center Pascagoula Mississippi
                [21 ]Marine and Freshwater Research Institute Reykjavík Iceland
                [22 ]School of Life and Environmental Sciences (Burwood Campus) Deakin University Geelong Victoria Australia
                [23 ]Marine Information and Research Group–Australia (MIRG) Quinns Rocks Western Australia Australia
                [24 ]National Marine Mammal Laboratory, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Alaska Fisheries Science Center Seattle Washington
                [25 ]Division of Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biology LMU Munich Planegg‐Martinsried Germany
                [26 ]Department of Evolutionary Biology, Science of Life Laboratory Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden
                Article
                10.1111/mec.15099
                31131963
                177891b8-fffe-4601-97a6-4e312a35b947
                © 2019

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article