There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to distinguish the integrative review method from other review
methods and to propose methodological strategies specific to the integrative review
method to enhance the rigour of the process.
Recent evidence-based practice initiatives have increased the need for and the production
of all types of reviews of the literature (integrative reviews, systematic reviews,
meta-analyses, and qualitative reviews). The integrative review method is the only
approach that allows for the combination of diverse methodologies (for example, experimental
and non-experimental research), and has the potential to play a greater role in evidence-based
practice for nursing. With respect to the integrative review method, strategies to
enhance data collection and extraction have been developed; however, methods of analysis,
synthesis, and conclusion drawing remain poorly formulated.
A modified framework for research reviews is presented to address issues specific
to the integrative review method. Issues related to specifying the review purpose,
searching the literature, evaluating data from primary sources, analysing data, and
presenting the results are discussed. Data analysis methods of qualitative research
are proposed as strategies that enhance the rigour of combining diverse methodologies
as well as empirical and theoretical sources in an integrative review.
An updated integrative review method has the potential to allow for diverse primary
research methods to become a greater part of evidence-based practice initiatives.