6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Study of Network Community Capacity to be a Subject: Digital Discursive Footprints

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The article is devoted to the assessment of the network community as a collective subject, as a group of interconnected and interdependent persons performing joint activities. According to the main research hypothesis, various forms of group subjectness, which determine its readiness for joint activities, are manifested in the discourse of the network community. Discourse constitutes a network community, mediates the interaction of its participants, represents ideas about the world, values, relationships, attitudes, sets patterns of behavior. A procedure is proposed for identifying discernible traces of the subjectness of a network community at various levels (lexical, semantic, content-analytical scales, etc.). The subjective structure of the network community is described based on experts’ implicit representations. The revealed components of the subjectness of network communities are compared with the characteristics of the subjectness of offline social groups. It is shown that the structure of the subjectness of network communities for some components is similar to the structure of the characteristics of the subjectness of offline social groups: the discourse of the network community represents a discussion of joint activities, group norms, and values, problems of civic identity. The specificity of network communities’ subjectness is revealed, which is manifested in the positive support of communication within the community, the identification and support of distinction between “us” and “them”. Two models of the relationship between discursive features and the construct “subjectness” are compared: additive-cumulative and additive. The equivalence of models is established based on the discriminativeness and the level of consistency with expert evaluation by external criteria.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group Norms

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The “Nasty Effect:” Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Breaching or Building Social Boundaries?: SIDE-Effects of Computer-Mediated Communication

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Behav Sci (Basel)
                Behav Sci (Basel)
                behavsci
                Behavioral Sciences
                MDPI
                2076-328X
                21 November 2019
                December 2019
                : 9
                : 12
                : 119
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Laboratory of Speech Psychology and Psycholinguistics, Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences; 13, Yaroslavskaya, Moscow 129366, Russia; gretiya@ 123456mail.ru (T.A.G.); kubrak.tina@ 123456gmail.com (T.A.K.); pavlova_natalya@ 123456mail.ru (N.D.P.)
                [2 ]Laboratory of Social and Economic Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences; 13, Yaroslavskaya, Moscow 129366, Russia; nestik@ 123456gmail.com
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: voroninan@ 123456bk.ru ; Tel.: +7-910-405-9426
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0701-1736
                Article
                behavsci-09-00119
                10.3390/bs9120119
                6961040
                31766380
                17c8024a-6eb1-4d47-a551-85a4895b2305
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 25 October 2019
                : 19 November 2019
                Categories
                Article

                discourse,digital footprints,group reflexivity,network community,subjectness

                Comments

                Comment on this article