16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association of Radioactive Iodine Treatment With Cancer Mortality in Patients With Hyperthyroidism

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Is radioactive iodine absorbed dose associated with overall and site-specific cancer mortality in patients with hyperthyroidism?

          Finding

          In this cohort study of 18 805 patients with hyperthyroidism treated with radioactive iodine, a statistically significant positive dose-response relationship for risk of death was observed for all solid cancers (6% increase in risk per 100-mGy dose to the stomach), breast cancer (12% increase in risk per 100-mGy dose to the breast), and all solid cancers excluding breast (5% increase in risk per 100-mGy dose to the stomach).

          Meaning

          This study’s findings suggest a modest positive association between greater organ-absorbed doses of radioactive iodine and risk of solid cancer death; additional studies are needed to fully weigh the risks and advantages of radioactive iodine and other treatment options for patients with hyperthyroidism.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Radioactive iodine (RAI) has been used extensively to treat hyperthyroidism since the 1940s. Although widely considered a safe and effective therapy, RAI has been associated with elevated risks of total and site-specific cancer death among patients with hyperthyroidism.

          Objective

          To determine whether greater organ- or tissue-absorbed doses from RAI treatment are associated with overall and site-specific cancer mortality in patients with hyperthyroidism.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This cohort study is a 24-year extension of the multicenter Cooperative Thyrotoxicosis Therapy Follow-up Study, which has followed up US and UK patients diagnosed and treated for hyperthyroidism for nearly 7 decades, beginning in 1946. Patients were traced using records from the National Death Index, Social Security Administration, and other resources. After exclusions, 18 805 patients who were treated with RAI and had no history of cancer at the time of the first treatment were eligible for the current analysis. Excess relative risks (ERRs) per 100-mGy dose to the organ or tissue were calculated using multivariable-adjusted linear dose-response models and were converted to relative risks (RR = 1 + ERR). The current analyses were conducted from April 28, 2017, to January 30, 2019.

          Exposures

          Mean total administered activity of sodium iodide I 131 was 375 MBq for patients with Graves disease and 653 MBq for patients with toxic nodular goiter. Mean organ or tissue dose estimates ranged from 20 to 99 mGy (colon or rectum, ovary, uterus, prostate, bladder, and brain/central nervous system), to 100 to 400 mGy (pancreas, kidney, liver, stomach, female breast, lung, oral mucosa, and marrow), to 1.6 Gy (esophagus), and to 130 Gy (thyroid gland).

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Site-specific and all solid-cancer mortality.

          Results

          A total of 18 805 patients were included in the study cohort, and the mean (SD) entry age was 49 (14) years. Most patients were women (14 671 [78.0%]), and most had a Graves disease diagnosis (17 615 [93.7%]). Statistically significant positive associations were observed for all solid cancer mortality (n = 1984; RR at 100-mGy dose to the stomach = 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.10; P = .002), including female breast cancer (n = 291; RR at 100-mGy dose to the breast = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.003-1.32; P = .04) and all other solid cancers combined (n = 1693; RR at 100-mGy dose to the stomach = 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.10; P = .01). The 100-mGy dose to the stomach and breast corresponded to a mean (SD) administered activity of 243 (35) MBq and 266 (58) MBq in patients with Graves disease. For every 1000 patients with hyperthyroidism receiving typical doses to the stomach (150 to 250 mGy), an estimated lifetime excess of 19 (95% CI, 3-40) to 32 (95% CI, 5-66) solid cancer deaths could occur.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In RAI-treated patients with hyperthyroidism, greater organ-absorbed doses appeared to be modestly positively associated with risk of death from solid cancer, including breast cancer. Additional studies are needed of the risks and advantages of all major treatment options available to patients with hyperthyroidism.

          Abstract

          This cohort study evaluates the level of ionizing radiation exposure and risk of cancer death from a common treatment for hyperthyroidism in a large and longest-running cohort of patients with hyperthyroidism.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Management of Graves Disease: A Review.

          Graves disease is the most common cause of persistent hyperthyroidism in adults. Approximately 3% of women and 0.5% of men will develop Graves disease during their lifetime.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A 2013 European survey of clinical practice patterns in the management of Graves' disease.

            Management of Graves' disease (GD) in Europe was published in 1987. Aim of this survey was to provide an update on clinical practice in Europe, and to compare it with a 2011 American survey.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Thyroid Cancer after Childhood Exposure to External Radiation: An Updated Pooled Analysis of 12 Studies.

              Studies have causally linked external thyroid radiation exposure in childhood with thyroid cancer. In 1995, investigators conducted relative risk analyses of pooled data from seven epidemiologic studies. Doses were mostly 50 Gy. We pooled data from 12 studies of thyroid cancer patients who were exposed to radiation in childhood (ages <20 years), more than doubling the data, including 1,070 (927 exposed) thyroid cancers and 5.3 million (3.4 million exposed) person-years. Relative risks increased supralinearly through 2-4 Gy, leveled off between 10-30 Gy and declined thereafter, remaining significantly elevated above 50 Gy. There was a significant relative risk trend for doses <0.10 Gy (P < 0.01), with no departure from linearity (P = 0.36). We observed radiogenic effects for both papillary and nonpapillary tumors. Estimates of excess relative risk per Gy (ERR/Gy) were homogeneous by sex (P = 0.35) and number of radiation treatments (P = 0.84) and increased with decreasing age at the time of exposure. The ERR/Gy estimate was significant within ten years of radiation exposure, 2.76 (95% CI, 0.94-4.98), based on 42 exposed cases, and remained elevated 50 years and more after exposure. Finally, exposure to chemotherapy was significantly associated with thyroid cancer, with results supporting a nonsynergistic (additive) association with radiation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Intern Med
                JAMA Intern Med
                JAMA Intern Med
                JAMA Internal Medicine
                American Medical Association
                2168-6106
                2168-6114
                1 July 2019
                August 2019
                5 August 2019
                1 July 2019
                : 179
                : 8
                : 1034-1042
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
                [2 ]Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
                [3 ]Melohill Technology LLC, Rockville, Maryland
                [4 ]Epidemiology and Biostatistics Program, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
                [5 ]Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
                [6 ]Department of Radiology, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey
                [7 ]Hirosoft International, Eureka, California
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: April 22, 2019.
                Published Online: July 1, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0981
                Correction: This article was corrected on August 5, 2019, to fix an error in the abstract.
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2019 Kitahara CM et al. JAMA Internal Medicine.
                Corresponding Author: Cari M. Kitahara, PhD, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Rm 7E-536, Bethesda, MD 20892 ( kitaharac@ 123456mail.nih.gov ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Kitahara and Preston had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Kitahara, Berrington de Gonzalez, Preston.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Kitahara, Berrington de Gonzalez, Brill, Bouville, Doody, Melo, Simon, Sosa, Tulchinsky, Villoing, Preston.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Kitahara, Berrington de Gonzalez, Preston.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Kitahara, Berrington de Gonzalez, Bouville, Doody, Simon, Sosa, Tulchinsky, Villoing, Preston, Brill, Melo.
                Statistical analysis: Kitahara, Berrington de Gonzalez, Preston.
                Obtained funding: Kitahara, Doody.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Brill, Doody, Melo, Simon.
                Supervision: Berrington de Gonzalez.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Sosa reported being a member of the Data Monitoring Committee of the Medullary Thyroid Cancer Consortium Registry supported by GlaxoSmithKline, Novo Nordisk, Astra Zeneca, and Eli Lilly. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was funded by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Additional Contributions: We are grateful to the patients who participated as well as to the collaborating physicians and institutions of the original Cooperative Thyrotoxicosis Therapy Follow-up Study, without whom this study would not have been possible.
                Article
                ioi190030
                10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0981
                6604114
                31260066
                17d283d7-16b1-44c8-a05b-fdbf71cb95e3
                Copyright 2019 Kitahara CM et al. JAMA Internal Medicine.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 1 December 2018
                : 16 February 2019
                : 28 February 2019
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online First

                Comments

                Comment on this article